Order 11

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: -1-
7 RCA DJ 68/25
Sarita Vs. SUKHBIR SINGH AND OTHERS
08.08.2026
Present: Sh. Atul Bandhu, Ld. Counsel for the appellant along
with appellant in person.
Sh. Lalit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the respondent no.1(a)
(iii) through VC.
Sh. Vatsal A. Chadha, Ld. Counsel for the respondents
no.1(a)(i) and (a)(ii) through VC.
Sh. Manish Phore, Ld. Counsel for the LRs of deceased
respondent no.1(b)(i) to (b)(iii) and respondent no.1(c)
through VC.
Sh. Vikas Panwar/respondent no.1(b)(ii) and Sh. Vishal
Panwar/respondent no.1(b)(iii) in person.
Respondents no.2 and 15 are already
ex-parte vide order
dated 17.04.2026.
None for the respondents no.3 to 6.
Service of the respondents no.7 to 14 has been dispensed
with vide order dated 17.04.2026.
Perusal of the record shows that the respondent no.1(a)
(iii) namely Sh. Ashwani Panwar was proceeded
ex-parte on
17.04.2026. However, on the last date of hearing, one Counsel
namely Sh. Lalit Kumar had appeared and informed the Court that
Sh. Ashwani Panwar had already expired on 28.04.2024 and time
was sought for moving appropriate application for bringing on
record/providing details of LRs of respondent no.1(a)(iii).
On behalf of LRs of Sh. Ashwani Kumar, two
applications have been filed through e-filing under Order 22 Rule 4
CPC for bringing on record his LRs. Copy of the same has not been
supplied to opposite Counsels. Let the same be supplied and physical
copy be also filed on record.
Contd……
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Another application has also been filed on behalf of one
of the LR of Late Sh. Ashwani Panwar namely Savita Panwar for
setting-aside
ex-parte order dated 17.04.2026. Copy has already been
supplied. Till date, LRs of Late Sh. Ashwani Kumar has not been on
record. Accordingly, this application is pre-mature having been
moved by a person who is not a party to the present appeal. The
same is, accordingly, dismissed as misconceived. However, it is
clarified that in case LRs of Late Sh. Ashwani Panwar are impleaded
on record pursuant to their application under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC,
they have right to participate in the arguments on the present appeal.
Renotify for consideration of application under Order 22
Rule 4 CPC and consideration of application for stay on 17.08.2026.
(Shivali Sharma)
District Judge-06, Central
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/08.08.2026(k)
-- 2 of 2 --