Full Order Text
Interim Order 8 · 15 Sept 2026 · CNR DLCT010064272026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 450/26 BKL AGRO FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. AMARJIT KUMAR SAH 15.09.2026 Present : Sh. Deepak Jain, Ld. Counsel for the Plaintiff. Sh. Amit Sinha and Sh. Shambhu Kumar, Ld. Counsels for the defendant. Matter is fixed today for disposal of two applications filed by the parties i.e. one u/o VII rule 14 CPC moved by the Plaintiff for placing on record the ledger entries w.e.f. 01.04.2023 till 31.03.2025 and another application u/o VII Rule 11 CPC moved by the Defendant for rejection of the plaint on the ground of improper valuation of suit and insufficient court fees being affixed to the plaint as well as for defective statement of truth accompanying the plaint. After addressing the Court to some extent, Ld. Counsel for the Plaintiff has offered to withdraw his application due to some technical defects. Heard. In view of the statement made at BAR, the application of the Plaintiff u/o VII rule 14 CPC is dismissed as not pressed. So far as the Defendant’s application u/o VII rule 11 CPC is concerned, a defective statement of truth not in conformity with the Provisions of CPC has its own repercussion, however, suit cannot be rejected on this short ground alone. So far as under valuation or affixation of improper court fees is concerned, Ld. Counsel for the Plaintiff has filed an Contd….2/- -- 1 of 2 -- - 2- application u/s 149 CPC today and its reply has also been filed on behalf of the Defendant. It has been stated that deficient court fees is already placed on record along with replication and this application has been filed today only to avoid any technical objections to the filing of additional court fees. Heard. Since the defect is curable in nature and same has already been cured, hence, I do not find any merits in the defendant’s application u/o VII Rule 11 CPC, however, as prayed by Ld. Counsel for the Defendant, the Deficient court fee as well as the statement of truth filed earlier in the proper format are taken on record subject to payment of cost of Rs. 2,000/- to be paid by the Ld. Counsel for the Plaintiff to the Ld. Counsel for Defendant to compensate him for the delay occasioned. Now to come up for framing of issues as well as for case management hearing and for payment of cost on 08.10.2026. (Lokesh Kumar Sharma) District Judge (Commercial Court)-04 Central/Delhi/15.09.2026 Lokesh Kumar Sharma Digitally signed by Lokesh Kumar Sharma Date: 2026.09.15 15:06:45 +0530 -- 2 of 2 --