Cr Rev - CRIMINAL REVISION
M/S NARSHI PHARMACEUTICAL AND SURGICAL PVT. LTD. AND ORS +2 moreVsREGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
CNR DLCT010050582026314-Additional Sessions Judge - 02
Tis Hazari, District Sessions Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING
TrustJury record updated 14 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 204/2026
- Registration Date
- 23 Mar 2026
- Next Hearing Date
- 06 Nov 2026
- Case Stage
- Misc. Arguments
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
4Acts & Sections
1Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita · Sec 438 · 440
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 23-03-2026 Business: FRESH Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 21-04-2026 Date: 21-04-2026 Business: Ld. P.O is on half day leave. Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 12-05-2026 Date: 12-05-2026 Reason For Adjournment: Judge on Leave Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 11-08-2026 Date: 11-08-2026 Business: For Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 16-09-2026 Date: 16-09-2026 Business: For Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 06-11-2026
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 1823/2026 Filing Date: 20-03-2026 eFiling Number: ADL20240008217C202600002 eFiling Date: 19-03-2026 First Hearing Date: 23rd March 2026 Court Number And Judge: 314-Additional Sessions Judge - 02
Orders
4Interim Order 211 Aug 2026
11 Aug 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 4 Cr Rev / 204/2026 M/S NARSHI PHARMACEUTICAL AND SURGICAL PVT. LTD. AND ORS Vs. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES 11.08.2026 Video Conferencing facility is active throughout the proceedings during the day. Present: Sh. Abhijeet Vikram Singh, Ld. counsel for the revisionist (through VC). Sh. M.S. Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for the respondent. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the revisionist that proceedings before the Trial Court be stayed as the complaint itself is time-barred and framing of charge will adversely affect them. On the other hand, it is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the respondent that there is no question of stay in the present matter as the impugned order is interlocutory in nature and therefore, the revision petition is not maintainable. As such, no ground is made out to stay the proceedings before the Trial Court. Time sought by the Ld. Counsel for the respondent for filing reply. Let the same be filed with advance copy to the opposite party. Let TCR be called for NDOH. Now to come up for arguments on maintainability on 16.09.2026. (Shilpi Jain) ASJ-02, Central, THC Delhi-11.08.2026(A) -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 123 Mar 2026
23 Mar 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Crl. Rev. 204/2026 M/S NARSHI PHARAMACEUTICAL AND SURGICAL PVT LTD & ORS. Vs. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES 23.03.2026 Video Conferencing facility is active throughout the proceedings during the day. Fresh revision petition received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: Sh. Abhijeet Vikram Singh, Ld. Counsel for revisionist. The revisionst has prefered the revision petition u/s 438 r/w section 440 BNSS against impugned order dated 29.06.2024 passed by Sh. Mayank Mittal, Ld. ACMM, Special Acts, Centeral District THC Delhi. An application seeking condonation of delay already filed. Heard, persued. Issue notice to the application for seeking condonation of delay as well as respondent on filing of PF for NDOH. TCR be also summoned for NDOH. Put up for reply and arguments seeking application for condonation of delay on 21.04.2026. (Shilpi Jain) ASJ-02, Central, THC Delhi-23.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 211 Aug 2026
11 Aug 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 4 Cr Rev / 204/2026 M/S NARSHI PHARMACEUTICAL AND SURGICAL PVT. LTD. AND ORS Vs. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES 11.08.2026 Video Conferencing facility is active throughout the proceedings during the day. Present: Sh. Abhijeet Vikram Singh, Ld. counsel for the revisionist (through VC). Sh. M.S. Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for the respondent. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the revisionist that proceedings before the Trial Court be stayed as the complaint itself is time-barred and framing of charge will adversely affect them. On the other hand, it is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the respondent that there is no question of stay in the present matter as the impugned order is interlocutory in nature and therefore, the revision petition is not maintainable. As such, no ground is made out to stay the proceedings before the Trial Court. Time sought by the Ld. Counsel for the respondent for filing reply. Let the same be filed with advance copy to the opposite party. Let TCR be called for NDOH. Now to come up for arguments on maintainability on 16.09.2026. (Shilpi Jain) ASJ-02, Central, THC Delhi-11.08.2026(A) -- 1 of 1 --
Order 123 Mar 2026
23 Mar 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Crl. Rev. 204/2026 M/S NARSHI PHARAMACEUTICAL AND SURGICAL PVT LTD & ORS. Vs. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES 23.03.2026 Video Conferencing facility is active throughout the proceedings during the day. Fresh revision petition received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: Sh. Abhijeet Vikram Singh, Ld. Counsel for revisionist. The revisionst has prefered the revision petition u/s 438 r/w section 440 BNSS against impugned order dated 29.06.2024 passed by Sh. Mayank Mittal, Ld. ACMM, Special Acts, Centeral District THC Delhi. An application seeking condonation of delay already filed. Heard, persued. Issue notice to the application for seeking condonation of delay as well as respondent on filing of PF for NDOH. TCR be also summoned for NDOH. Put up for reply and arguments seeking application for condonation of delay on 21.04.2026. (Shilpi Jain) ASJ-02, Central, THC Delhi-23.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
