Skip to main content
Cr Rev - CRIMINAL REVISION

M/S NARSHI PHARMACEUTICAL AND SURGICAL PVT. LTD. AND ORS +2 moreVsREGISTRAR OF COMPANIES

CNR DLCT010050582026314-Additional Sessions Judge - 02
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 14 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
204/2026
Registration Date
23 Mar 2026
Next Hearing Date
06 Nov 2026
Case Stage
Misc. Arguments

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    4

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita · Sec 438 · 440

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 23-03-2026
    Business: FRESH
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 21-04-2026
    
    Date: 21-04-2026
    Business: Ld. P.O is on half day leave.
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 12-05-2026
    
    Date: 12-05-2026
    Reason For Adjournment: Judge on Leave
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 11-08-2026
    
    Date: 11-08-2026
    Business: For
    Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 16-09-2026
    
    Date: 16-09-2026
    Business: For
    Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 06-11-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 1823/2026
    Filing Date: 20-03-2026
    eFiling Number: ADL20240008217C202600002
    eFiling Date: 19-03-2026
    First Hearing Date: 23rd March 2026
    Court Number And Judge: 314-Additional Sessions Judge - 02

    Orders

    4
    Interim Order 2
    11 Aug 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 4 Cr Rev / 204/2026
    M/S NARSHI PHARMACEUTICAL AND SURGICAL PVT.
    LTD. AND ORS Vs. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
    11.08.2026
    Video Conferencing facility is active throughout the
    proceedings during the day.
    Present: Sh. Abhijeet Vikram Singh, Ld. counsel for the
    revisionist (through VC).
    Sh. M.S. Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
    It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the revisionist
    that proceedings before the Trial Court be stayed as the complaint
    itself is time-barred and framing of charge will adversely affect
    them.
    On the other hand, it is submitted by the Ld. Counsel
    for the respondent that there is no question of stay in the present
    matter as the impugned order is interlocutory in nature and
    therefore, the revision petition is not maintainable.
    As such, no ground is made out to stay the
    proceedings before the Trial Court.
    Time sought by the Ld. Counsel for the respondent for
    filing reply. Let the same be filed with advance copy to the opposite
    party.
    Let TCR be called for NDOH.
    Now to come up for arguments on maintainability on
    16.09.2026.
    (Shilpi Jain)
    ASJ-02, Central, THC
    Delhi-11.08.2026(A)
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    23 Mar 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: Crl. Rev. 204/2026
    M/S NARSHI PHARAMACEUTICAL AND SURGICAL PVT LTD
    & ORS. Vs. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
    23.03.2026
    Video Conferencing facility is active throughout the
    proceedings during the day.
    Fresh revision petition received by way of assignment. It be
    checked and registered.
    Present: Sh. Abhijeet Vikram Singh, Ld. Counsel for revisionist.
    The revisionst has prefered the revision petition u/s 438
    r/w section 440 BNSS against impugned order dated 29.06.2024
    passed by Sh. Mayank Mittal, Ld. ACMM, Special Acts, Centeral
    District THC Delhi.
    An application seeking condonation of delay already
    filed.
    Heard, persued.
    Issue notice to the application for seeking condonation
    of delay as well as respondent on filing of PF for NDOH.
    TCR be also summoned for NDOH.
    Put up for reply and arguments seeking application for
    condonation of delay on 21.04.2026.
    (Shilpi Jain)
    ASJ-02, Central, THC
    Delhi-23.03.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    11 Aug 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 4 Cr Rev / 204/2026
    M/S NARSHI PHARMACEUTICAL AND SURGICAL PVT.
    LTD. AND ORS Vs. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
    11.08.2026
    Video Conferencing facility is active throughout the
    proceedings during the day.
    Present: Sh. Abhijeet Vikram Singh, Ld. counsel for the
    revisionist (through VC).
    Sh. M.S. Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
    It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the revisionist
    that proceedings before the Trial Court be stayed as the complaint
    itself is time-barred and framing of charge will adversely affect
    them.
    On the other hand, it is submitted by the Ld. Counsel
    for the respondent that there is no question of stay in the present
    matter as the impugned order is interlocutory in nature and
    therefore, the revision petition is not maintainable.
    As such, no ground is made out to stay the
    proceedings before the Trial Court.
    Time sought by the Ld. Counsel for the respondent for
    filing reply. Let the same be filed with advance copy to the opposite
    party.
    Let TCR be called for NDOH.
    Now to come up for arguments on maintainability on
    16.09.2026.
    (Shilpi Jain)
    ASJ-02, Central, THC
    Delhi-11.08.2026(A)
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    23 Mar 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: Crl. Rev. 204/2026
    M/S NARSHI PHARAMACEUTICAL AND SURGICAL PVT LTD
    & ORS. Vs. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
    23.03.2026
    Video Conferencing facility is active throughout the
    proceedings during the day.
    Fresh revision petition received by way of assignment. It be
    checked and registered.
    Present: Sh. Abhijeet Vikram Singh, Ld. Counsel for revisionist.
    The revisionst has prefered the revision petition u/s 438
    r/w section 440 BNSS against impugned order dated 29.06.2024
    passed by Sh. Mayank Mittal, Ld. ACMM, Special Acts, Centeral
    District THC Delhi.
    An application seeking condonation of delay already
    filed.
    Heard, persued.
    Issue notice to the application for seeking condonation
    of delay as well as respondent on filing of PF for NDOH.
    TCR be also summoned for NDOH.
    Put up for reply and arguments seeking application for
    condonation of delay on 21.04.2026.
    (Shilpi Jain)
    ASJ-02, Central, THC
    Delhi-23.03.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.