Order 19

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Execution (Comm.) No. 131/24
Janki Enterprises v. Mangalmay Radhey International
06.12.2025
Present: Mr. Upender, Advocate, proxy for counsel for the decree
holder.
Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate for the judgment debtors Nos. 1
to 3 along with judgment debtor No. 3 Krishan Mangal in
person.
Cost in the sum of Rs.1,000/-, imposed upon the judgment
debtors No.1 to 3 on 25.7.2025, is paid by counsel for the judgment
debtors to proxy for counsel for the decree holder.
Warrant of attachment issued in respect of the bank account
of the judgment debtor No. 3 received back. As per the report on the
warrant, the same was served upon the Bank Manager concerned. No
report has been received from the Manager concerned. Report be called
from the Bank Manager concerned regarding the money lying in the
attached account for the next date.
By order dated 15.11.2025 passed by this court the
judgment debtor No. 2 was directed to remain present in the court along
with her affidavit of assets and properties. The judgment debtor No. 2,
namely, Anuradha Mangal is not present in person. A document
purporting to be her affidavit attested by the oath commissioner on
06.12.2025 is sought to be filed. Copy of the same is supplied to proxy
for counsel for the decree holder. When the court asked counsel for the
Contd...
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
judgment debtors for presence of deponent Anuradha Mangal, it is
submitted by counsel for the judgment debtors that purported affidavit
was signed and verified by deponent Anuradha Mangal on 05.12.2025
and the same has been attested today by the oath commissioner without
her presence. It shows apparent misconduct on the part of the oath
commissioner, therefore, notice be issued to oath commissioner Madhuri
to remain present in person on the next along with her register of oath to
explain her conduct. The affidavit of the judgment debtor No. 2 is
rejected. The judgment debtor No. 2 is directed to appear in person on
the next date along with her affidavit of assets and property.
An application under section 151 CPC for de-freezing of
bank account is made on behalf of the judgment debtor No. 3. Heard.
Copy of the application is supplied to proxy for counsel for the decree
holder.
Put up for reply and consideration on the application under
section 151 CPC for de-freezing of bank account made on behalf of the
judgment debtor No. 3, presence of judgment debtor No. 2 Anuradha
Mangal along with her fresh affidavit of assets and property, appearance
of the oath commissioner and return of report from Central Bank of
India, Branch Sadar Bazar, Delhi on 13.01.2026.
(MANOJ KUMAR-1)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-05
(Central)/THC/Delhi/06.12.2025
-- 2 of 2 --