Order 1

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Priyanki Mondal v. Hans Raj Aggarwal
CNR No.: DLCT01-004893-2026
Crl. Rev. No. 191/2026
19.03.2026
Criminal revision petition received by way of
assignment. It be checked and registered.
Present : Mr. Shubham Sharma and Mr. Pawan Kumar, Ld.
Counsel for the revisionist.
The revisionist is present.
The present revision petition has been preferred
against order dated 11.03.2026, passed by Ld. JMFC (NI
Act)-02, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, whereby the Ld. Trial
Court while allowing the respondent’s application, issued
warrants of attachment to a tune of Rs.3,40,000/- as per the list of
assests, furnished by the respondent before the Ld. Trial Court.
Ld. Counsel for the revisionist has apprised this
Court of the facts of the present case as well as further grounds
of challenge of the impungned order.
Ld. Counsel for the revisionist has further submitted
that while passing the impugned order, the Ld. Trial Court did
not take into consideration the submissions addressed by the
revisionist in so far as the immovable property specified under
the respondent’s application,
i.e., premise bearing no. C-1007,
Signature Global, Sector 93, Gurugram was a rented premise by
virtue of agreement dated 22.02.2026, executed between one Ms.
Rosie Mittal and the revisionist herein. Even otherwise, Ld.
Counsel has submitted that while passing the said order, Ld.
Trial Court failed to consider that the revisionist was deprived of
her opportunity to bring-forth the correct facts before the Ld.
Trial Court and that as per the Ld. Counsel, the impugned order
was passed without application of mind. As per the Ld. Counsel,
Contd..2/-
-- 1 of 2 --
..2..
while passing the impugned order, the Ld. Trial Court failed to
consider that owing to such an order the revisionist would suffer
serious repercussions in as much as the revisionist was also
evicted earlier from a rented premise due to an adverse order.
Heard. Perused.
Issue notice of the petition to the respondent on PF,
through registered post, approved courier, Whatsapp and e-mail
for the next date of hearing.
In the interest of justice, list for further proceedings
on 23.05.2026.
Further, considering the submissions made by Ld.
Counsel and the grounds of challenge, in particular, the
apprehension expressed that the revisionist might be evicted
from the rented premise and that the said premise does not
belong in the name of the revisionist, in the considered opinion
of this Court,
prima facie ground exist for allowing the entreaty
of stay of operation of impugned order till the next date of
hearing. Acordingly, the operation of the impugned order dated
11.03.2026 of the Ld. Trial Court is stayed till the next date of
hearing.
A copy of this order be given
dasti to Ld. Counsel
for the Ld. Counsel for the revisionist. A copy of this order be
marked to the Ld. Trial Court for record and compliance
purposes.
TCR be requisitioned two days, prior to the next
date of hearing.
Abhishek Goyal
ASJ-03, Central District,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
19.03.2026
-- 2 of 2 --