Interim Order 4

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16.04.2025 Ex No. 23334/16
Jawahar Lal vs. Subhash Chander
Present: Sh. Shyam Mohan Sareen in person.
JD in person.
All the parties including JD no. 1 Sh. Subhash Chander are ready to sell
the property on as is where is basis since it is submitted that an intending buyer and is
ready to purchase the property without the same having been converted into freehold
property for which applications are pending before the concerned department,
accordingly, in view of the agreement between the parties, let the property be sold to
the intending buyer and as aforesaid.
The sale proceeds shall be divided between the parties as per the shares
allocated to the parties vide the final decree dated 01.10.2014.
All the parties are directed to execute the necessary documents in favour
of the intending buyer.
Renotify for further proceedings on 03.07.2025.
Sachin Sood
DJ-01, Central, THC
Delhi, 16.04.2025
-- 1 of 15 --
16.04.2025 Ex No. 1228/23
Meena vs. MCD
Present: Proxy counsel for the DH.
Proxy counsel for the JD.
It is submitted by the counsel for the JD that she has not been provided
with the BMID No, Zone and department in terms of orders dated 17.01.2025.
Let the same be provided to the counsel for the JD within two days from
today who is directed to apprise the court with respect to regularization arrears as
well as interest awarded under the order dated 09.10.2023.
Renotify on 08.07.2025.
Sachin Sood
DJ-01, Central, THC
Delhi, 16.04.2025
-- 2 of 15 --
16.04.2025 Ex No. 64/24
Shobhas Ram vs. MCD
Present: Sh. Ayush Garg, Ld. Counsel for the DH.
Proxy counsel for the JD.
Ld. Counsel for the JD as well as the DH have filed on record her calculation
showing the total due entitlement of the DH under the order dated 04.11.2023 is Rs.
3,59,350/- inclusive of interest.
However, the court pursuant to warrants of attachment is in receipt of banker’s
cheque for an amount of Rs. 2,91,774/- vide banker cheque no. 751208 dated 29.03.2025.
Let the same be released to the DH against due acknowledgement and upon
recording the statement of the DH that no amount has been received by the DH under the
order dated 04.11.2023.
The DH would further certify in the aforesaid statement that he has not
received any amount in any other proceedings arising out of order dt 04.11.2023 in LC No.
1767/19 against the JD and also that he would indemnify the JD in case of any excess
payment and also a statement that in case any of the statement recorded by the court is
found to be untrue he shall be liable for committing the offence of perjury upon the court.
The DH shall further certify that as on date no other execution petition has
been filed in respect of order dated 04.11.2023 and neither the same is pending in any of the
courts in India.
List for arguments on the calculation of interest as submitted by the parties.
In the meanwhile since the JD has admitted that a further amount of Rs.
67,608/- is due and payable to the DH, issue warrants of attachment for an amount of Rs
67,608/- against the bank account of the JD bearing no 41010068213, State Bank of India,
Chandni Chowk, Delhi-06 in respect of the awarded amount on filing of PF.
Renotify on 03.07.2025.
Sachin Sood
DJ-01, Central, THC
Delhi, 16.04.2025
-- 3 of 15 --
16.04.2025 RCA No. 83/24
Swapanbhai Kalipada vs. Tumpaben
Present: Sh. Sumit Nandvani, Ld. Counsel for the appellant through VC.
The notice of the application under Section 14 of the Limitation Act
issued on the LDOH has not been received back as served.
The appellant is directed to take steps for service of the respondent on
filing of PF/RC/Speed Post.
Since the respondent is stated to be the resident of Ahmedbad, Gujarat,
the appellant is at liberty to serve the respondent through the office of concerned Ld.
District and Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
List on 23.07.2025.
Sachin Sood
DJ-01, Central, THC
Delhi, 16.04.2025
-- 4 of 15 --
16.04.2025 Arbtn No. 937/24
Tata Capital vs. Arun Sharma
Present: None for the petitioner.
Despite direction, fresh address of the respondent has not been filed.
The petitioner is directed to place the same on record and upon
furnishing of the same, issue fresh notice of the present petition upon the respondent
on filing of PF/RC/Speed Post.
Renotify on 29.07.2025.
Sachin Sood
DJ-01, Central, THC
Delhi, 16.04.2025
-- 5 of 15 --
16.04.2025 Ex No. 7177/24
Sarupi Devi vs. MCD
Present: Ld. Counsel for the DH.
Proxy counsel for the JD.
The JD till date has not filed any counter calculations nor has apprised
the court as to whether any payment under the order dated 16.10.2024 has been made
to the DH.
The court pursuant to warrants of attachment is in receipt of the bankers
cheque in the name of Sarupi Devi for an amount of Rs. 16,24,603/- and also three
other bankers cheque in the name of Suresh Kumar, Naresh Kumar and Sh. Fakir
Chand i.e. the three Lrs of Late Smt. Sarupi Devi, W/o of Sh. Mam Chand.
Since, the bankers cheque bearing no. 751295 for an amount of Rs.
16,24,603/- has been received inadvertently, let the same be sent back to the issuing
bank with directions to recredit the amount from the account from which it was
deducted.
Since alongwith the present execution petition, separate affidavits of the
Lrs of Late Smt. Sarupi Devi has been filed, accordingly, let the bankers cheque
received in the name of Sh. Suresh Kumar, Naresh Kumar and Sh. Fakir Chand be
released in favour of the said persons against due acknowledgment and upon
recording the statement of the DH that the said amount constitute full and final
amount in terms of order dt 16.10.2024.
The Lrs of Late Smt. Sarupi Devi would certify in the aforesaid
statement that he has not received any amount in any other proceedings arising out of
order dt 16.10.2024 in LC No 1760/24 against the JD and also that they would
indemnify the JD in case of any excess payment and also a statement that in case any
of the statement recorded by the court is found to be untrue they shall be liable for
committing the offence of perjury upon the court.
-- 6 of 15 --
The Lrs of the DH shall further certify that as on date no other execution
petition has been filed in respect of order dated 16.10.2024 and neither the same is
pending in any of the courts in India.
The parties are directed to apprise the court as to whether any payment
under the head of 7th CPC arrears amounting to Rs. 40,140/- has been made to the Lrs
of the deceased Smt. Sarupi Devi.
Renotify for further proceedings on 10.06.2025.
Sachin Sood
DJ-01, Central, THC
Delhi, 16.04.2025
-- 7 of 15 --
16.04.2025 M No. 154, 155/25
Present: Ld. Counsel for the applicant.
Sh. Gaurav Dubey, Ld. Counsel for the non applicant/respondent through
VC.
Ld. Counsel for the respondent submits that he has filed reply to the
applications under Section 340 CrPC. Taken on record. Copy supplied.
List for arguments on the said application on 08.05.2025.
An extra copy of reply of the application under Section 340 CrPC
has been placed on record for the benefit of the applicant who may collect the
same from the court.
Sachin Sood
DJ-01, Central, THC
Delhi, 16.04.2025
-- 8 of 15 --
16.04.2025 CS No. 296/19
Anil Handa and ors. Naval Kishore
Present: Sh. Gaurav Dubey, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Defendant in person.
Matter is listed for cross-examination of PW-1.
PW-1 is present in the court.
An adjournment is being sought on behalf of the defendant stating that
he does not have the copy of the examination-in-chief which was recorded on
24.02.2024.
It is further submitted that the defendant is not well and accordingly
could not cross-examine PW-1.
Neither any medical documents have been placed on record and also
keeping in view the fact that the chief was recorded on 24.02.2024, the adjournment
sought today is clearly thus, on flimsy grounds.
One opportunity is granted to the defendant to cross-examine the three
witnesses i.e. PW-1 to PW-3 on the NDOH subject to a cost of Rs. 3000/-.
It is made clear that in case the witnesses despite being present are not
cross-examined, exemplary cost of Rs. 20,000/- would be imposed upon the
defendant.
The defendant is directed to produce on record the medical documents
on the NDOH.
Renotify for cross-examination of PW-1 to PW-3 on 08.05.2025.
Sachin Sood
DJ-01, Central, THC
Delhi, 16.04.2025
-- 9 of 15 --
16.04.2025 CS No. 9484/09
Charan Jeet vs. Manjeet Singh and ors.
Present: Sh. Mayank Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Sh. Sudip Lodh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.
Sh. Shivam Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1 and 3.
Matter is listed for arguments on the application under Order 1 Rule 10
CPC.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he would be filing a short
compilation before arguing the present matter.
At request, renotify on 28.05.2025.
Sachin Sood
DJ-01, Central, THC
Delhi, 16.04.2025
-- 10 of 15 --
16.04.2025 Arbtn No. 2185/23
Sunil Kumar vs. SMC Global
Present: Sh. Dinesh Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner a/w petitioner.
Ld. Counsel for the respondent through VC.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed on record written synopsis. Extra
copy of the same has been kept on record for the benefit of the respondent who is at
liberty to collect the same from the court.
List for arguments on 03.07.2025.
Sachin Sood
DJ-01, Central, THC
Delhi, 16.04.2025
-- 11 of 15 --
16.04.2025 CS No. 12313, 9945/16
Present: Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant through VC.
It is jointly submitted by the parties that the transfer petition has been
filed before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi and the matter may be taken up after
listing of the same.
At request, renotify on 21.05.2025.
Sachin Sood
DJ-01, Central, THC
Delhi, 16.04.2025
-- 12 of 15 --
16.04.2025 CS No. 131/23
Vijay Kumar vs. Shiv Shankar
Present: Ms. Shalu Pawar, Proxy counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant is ex-parte.
Certain clarifications are required.
At request, list on 08.05.2025.
Sachin Sood
DJ-01, Central, THC
Delhi, 16.04.2025
-- 13 of 15 --
16.04.2025 CS No. 405/25
Sonu vs. Amarnath
Fresh suit received on assignment, it be checked and registered.
Present: Ms. Sarla Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Issue summons of the present suit as well as notice of the application
under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC upon the defendant on filing of PF/RC/Speed Post.
Renotify on 13.05.2025.
Sachin Sood
DJ-01, Central, THC
Delhi, 16.04.2025
-- 14 of 15 --
16.04.2025 Ex No. 23455/16
Manoj Malik vs. Vinod Kumar
Present: Sh. Pankaj Kumar and Ms. Jeba Khan, Ld. Counsel for the DH.
Sh. Pankaj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for JD no. 2 to 4 a/w Karamveer,
one of the Lrs.
Part arguments heard.
List for remaining arguments on 09.06.2025 at 12 PM.
Sachin Sood
DJ-01, Central, THC
Delhi, 16.04.2025
-- 15 of 15 --