Full Order Text
Order 2 · 27 Feb 2026 · CNR DLCT010035312026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 1/2 7 Cr Rev 130/2026 SIDDHARTH TODI Vs. M/S ORIENT LINKS PVT. LTD. 27.02.2026 Video Conferencing facility is active throughout the proceedings during the day. Present: Sh. Navlendu Kumar, Ms. Swastika Kumari, Sh Sumish Kumar and Sh. Kaushal, Ld. counsels for revisionist. Ms. Madhulika Goyal, Ld. counsel for respondent (through VC). TCR received. Taken on record. It is submitted by Ld. counsel that he has received the copy of revision petition and need some time to file reply. Let same be filed with advance copy to the opposite party. It is submitted by Ld. counsel for the revisionist that operation of impugned order be stayed and if the same is not stayed, it will cause irreparable loss to the revisionist. On the contrary, it is submitted by Ld. counsel for the respondent that no application seeking stay has been moved on behalf of revisionist and that no ground is made out to stay the operation of the impugned order, as the Trial Court has passed a detailed reasoned order. Submissions heard. Perusal of the TCR reveals that the Trial Court has passed detailed reasoned order dated 21.01.2026. The record -- 1 of 2 -- 2/2 further reveals that no formal application seeking stay has been moved along with the present revision petition. Accordingly, in view of aforesaid facts and circumstances and considering the submissions made by both the parties, this Court is of the view that no ground is made out to stay the operation of impugned order at this stage. List for reply and arguments on 30.05.2026. (Shilpi Jain) ASJ-02, Central, THC Delhi-27.02.2026 -- 2 of 2 --
