Interim Order 11

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: -1-
11
Cr Rev no. 80/2024
Sarabjit Singh Anand Vs. Prem Kumar Verma
PS Kashmiri Gate
26.08.2025
Advocates are abstaining from work today.
Present: None for petitioner.
Respondent no. 1 in person through VC.
None for respondnet no. 2 Omkar Swaroop
Bhatnagar and Vishnu Swaroop Bhatnagar.
Respondent no. 4 in person through VC.
Mr. Parvinder Kumar, Incharge Nazarat Branch,
Central District, THC alongwith Process Server
Narender (looking after the work of process server
through e- mode).
Sh. Parvesh Ranga, Ld. Addl. Substitute PP for
State for respondent no. 5.
On inquiry, Incharge Nazarat Branch as well as
above said process server submit that as per record dated
16.06.2025, the process server tried to serve the summons upon
respondent Omkar Swaroop Bhatnagar physically and one Sonia
i.e. niece of said respondent was available who stated that the said
respondent is not at home and she does not know as to when he will
return.
As per report of 17.06.2025, the summons were sent
to respondent no. 2 Omkar Swaroop Bhatnagar through Whatsapp
and the process server has filed a print out having double tick of the
screenshot.
The Process Server dealing with summons through
e-mode submits that the double tick reflects that the summons have
been served upon the recipient.
In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
clear that the repondent no. 2 Omkar Swaroop Bhatnagar has been
served with the summons of the present revision petition.
Ahlmad and Assistant Ahlamd have filed their
explanation in terms of previous order. They are warned to be
careful in future.
Put up for appearance of respondent no. 2 on filing
reply if any with advance copy to the revisionist on 06.10.2025.
(Virender Singh)
Special Judge, NDPS-02,
Central,THC, Delhi/26.08.2025
-- 2 of 2 --