Order 51

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: SC : 142/2024
FIR No. : 1188/2023
PS: Karol Bagh
State Vs. Deepak @ Tattu
01.07.2026
Present: Sh. Himanshu Garg, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Sh. Rikhil Ld. Counsel for the accused.
I.A. No. 18/2026 : Bail application of Deepak @ Tattu son of
Ram Singh.
Argument on bail application heard.
Put up for orders.
(ANKUR JAIN-I)
ASJ-04/Central/Delhi.
01.07.2026
ORDER:-
1. Ld. counsel for the applicant submits that accused is in
judicial custody for the last 3 years. All the material public
witnesses have been examined. The co-accused has been granted
regular bail by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court vide its order dated
27.04.2026 and accused Kamal Kumar has been granted bail vide
order dated 01.06.2026 by this court. It is submitted that the role
of the present applicant is similar to the role of the co-accused
who have been granted bail.
2. On the other hand, Ld. Addl. PP for the State has opposed
the bail application on the ground that allegations are serious in
-- 1 of 3 --
:2:
nature and the present applicant had caught hold the victim
before robbing them.
3. I have heard Ld. Counsels for the parties and perused the
record.
4. On the statement of Mukesh Kumar, who works as an
accountant in the office of Saurabh Aggarwal, the present FIR
was registered in which he stated that on 30.10.2023 at about
3:00 pm. while he was alone in the office, where cash amounting
to Rs. 39 Lakhs was kept, three unknown persons entered the
office tied him with cello taps and rope and robbed the cash
along with mobile phone. On his complaint FIR u/s 392/34 IPC
was registered. During the course of investigation five accused
i.e. Raju Saini, Kamal Kumar, applicant, Deepak Kumar and
Deepak @ Tattu were arrested. At their instance aggregate sum
of Rs. 37,62,000/- was recovered along with mobile phone, a
knife and a toy gun. After completion of investigation charge-
sheet under Section 395/412/120B IPC was filed. Co-accused
Dipender Kumar Saini has been granted regular bail by the
Hon’ble Delhi High Court vide order dated 27.04.2026. The role
of the present applicant is similar to the role of the co-accused
Dipender Kumar Saini and Kamal Kumar. Accused has remained
-- 2 of 3 --
:3:
in judicial custody for nearly 3 years. He does not have any
previous involvement.
5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the
applicant is admitted to bail on furnishing P/B and S/B of Rs.
25,000/-with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of
this court/Ld. Link JMFC/Ld. Duty JMFC and also subject to
the following conditions:
a) The applicant/accused shall under no
circumstances leave the country;
b) The applicant/accused shall inform the
Court in the event of change of his address,
within two weeks.
c) The applicant/accused shall not commit any
offence in the event of there being any
FIR/DD Entry/ Complaint lodged against
the applicant, it would be open to the State to
seek cancellation of the application which
application, if any, filed would be
considered on its own merits.
6. Nothing said herein shall tantamount to any expression or
opinion of this Court on the merits of this case and all the
observations has been made only for the disposal of the present
application.
7. Application stands disposed off.
(ANKUR JAIN-I)
ASJ-04/Central/Delhi.
01.07.2026
-- 3 of 3 --