Order 48

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: SC : 142/2024
FIR No. : 1188/2023
PS: Karol Bagh
State Vs. Raju Saini & Ors.
01.06.2026
Present: Sh. Himanshu Garg, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Sh. Amjad Khan, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.
I.A.No. 17/26:- Application seeking regular bail on behalf of
applicant Kamal Kumar son of Hari Singh.
1. Arguments on the bail application were heard on
29.05.2026.
2. Ld. counsel for the applicant submits that accused is in
judicial custody for the last 2 ½ years. All the material public
witnesses have been examined. The co-accused has been granted
regular bail by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court vide its order dated
27.04.2026. It is submitted that the role of the present applicant
is similar to the role of the co-accused who has been granted bail.
3. On the other hand, Ld. Addl. PP for the State has opposed
the bail application on the ground that allegations are serious in
nature and the present applicant had caught hold the victim
before robbing them.
4. I have heard Ld. Counsels for the parties and perused the
record.
-- 1 of 3 --
:2:
5. On the statement of Mukesh Kumar, who works as an
accountant in the office of Saurabh Aggarwal, the present FIR
was registered in which he stated that on 30.10.2023 at about
3:00 pm. while he was alone in the office, where cash amounting
to Rs. 39 Lakhs was kept, three unknown persons entered the
office tied him with cello taps and rope and robbed the cash
along with mobile phone. On his complaint FIR u/s 392/34 IPC
was registered. During the course of investigation five accused
i.e. Raju Saini, Kamal Kumar, applicant, Deepak Kumar and
Deepak @ Tattu were arrested. At their instance aggregate sum
of Rs. 37,62,000/- was recovered along with mobile phone, a
knife and a toy gun. After completion of investigation charge-
sheet under Section 395/412/120B IPC was filed. Co-accused
Dipender Kumar Saini has been granted regular bail by the
Hon’ble Delhi High Court vide order dated 27.04.2026. The role
of the present applicant is similar to the role of the co-accused
Dipender Kumar Saini. Accused has remained in judicial custody
for about 2 years 6 months and 22 days. He does not have any
previous involvement.
6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the
applicant is admitted to bail on furnishing P/B and S/B of Rs.
-- 2 of 3 --
:3:
25,000/-with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of
this court/Ld. Link JMFC/Ld. Duty JMFC and also subject to
the following conditions:
a) The applicant/accused shall under no circumstances
leave the country;
b) The applicant/accused shall inform the Court in the
event of change of his address, within two weeks.
c) The applicant/accused shall not commit any offence
in the event of there being any FIR/DD Entry/
Complaint lodged against the applicant, it would be
open to the State to seek cancellation of the
application which application, if any, filed would be
considered on its own merits.
7. Nothing said herein shall tantamount to any expression or
opinion of this Court on the merits of this case and all the
observations has been made only for the disposal of the present
application.
8. Application stands disposed off.
(ANKUR JAIN-I)
ASJ-04/Central/Delhi.
01.06.2026 km
-- 3 of 3 --