Purushottam BanerjeeVsRohit Kohli

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CSDJ No. 246/25
Purushottam Banerjee Vs. Rohit Kohli
01-07-2026
Present: Ms. Lata, proxy counsel for plaintiff through VC
Sh. Vinay Ahrodiya and Sh. Asim Akhtar, advocates
for defendant
Evidence affidavit not yet filed on behalf of plaintiff till
date. One last and final opportunity is granted to the plaintiff to
lead PE failing which a cost of Rs. 5000 shall be imposed upon
the plaintiff.
At request, put up for PE on 23-09-2026.
(PANKAJ ARORA)
District Judge-16, Central District,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/01-07-2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 10 CS DJ 246/25
Purushottam Banerjee Vs. Rohit Kohli
06.03.2026
Pr.: Sh. Yogesh K. Chandna and Ms. Lata, Ld. Counsels for the
plaintiff.
Ms. Prity Raz, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Replication alongwith affidavit of admission-denial of documents
filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Affidavit of admission-denial of
documents stated to have already been filed on behalf of the defendant.
On the basis of the pleadings following issues are being framed as
under: :
1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of a sum of
Rs.25,00,000/- as damages from the defendant? OPP.
2. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for
pendente-lite and future
interest on the above stated sum from the defendant? If so, at
what rate and for what period? OPP.
3. Any other Relief?
No other issue arises or pressed for.
Put up for PE on 01.07.2026. Both the parties are directed to file
their respective list of witnesses alongwith evidence affidavits within
fifteen days from today and exchange the copies with each other.
(PANKAJ ARORA)
District Judge-16, Central Distt.,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi,
06.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 CS DJ 246/25
Purushottam Banerjee Vs. Rohit Kohli
24.12.2025
Pr.: Sh. Yogesh K Chandna, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ms. Preeti Raz, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Some more time sought on behalf of the plaintiff for filing the
replication. Let the same be filed on or before next date of hearing with
advance copy to the opposite party.
Both the parties are directed to file their respective affidavits of
admission-denial of documents with advance copy to opposite party.
Put up for filing of replication, if any, admission-denial of
documents and framing of issues on 06.03.2026.
(PANKAJ ARORA)
District Judge-16, Central Distt.,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi,
24.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CSDJ No. 246/25
Purushottam Banerjee Vs. Rohit Kohli
26-09-2025
Present: Sh. Yogesh K. Chandna, advocate for plaintiff
Ms. Prity Raz and Ms. Sonu Kumari, advocates for
defendant
Written statement along with application u/s 151 of CPC
for condonation of delay in filing the WS filed. Copy supplied.
Heard on the application for condonation of delay in filing
the WS.
It is submtted on behalf of defendant that there is delay of
47 days in filing the WS as copy of plaint was received by them
on 22-07-2025. Vide order dated 10-07-2025, the plaintiff was
directed to supply the copy of plaint during the course of the day.
Since the plaintiff himself is at default, the delay in filing the
written statement is hereby condoned. The application u/s 151
CPC stands disposed of.
Put up for filing of replication, if any, admission/ denial of
documents and framing of issues on 24-12-2025.
(PANKAJ ARORA)
District Judge-16, Central District,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/26-09-2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CSDJ No. 246/25
Purushottam Banerjee Vs. Rohit Kohli
10-07-2025
File has been received by way of transfer from the court of
Sh. Rajesh Malik, Ld. District Judge-06, Central Distt., Tis
Hazari Courts in view of Order No. 15/D-3/Gaz.IA/DHC/ 2025
dated 30.05.2025 of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.
Present: Ms. Lata, advocate for plaintiff
Sh. Nityanand Singh, advocate for defendant
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant.
It is submitted by ld. Counsel for defendant that copy of
plaint has not yet been received by the defendant. Nor he has
received physical copy of summons. Let copy of plaint be
supplied during the course of the day. Ld. Counsel for defendant
submits that he has already shared his mobile number with Ld.
Counsel for plaintiff.
The defendant is directed to file written statement within
the stipulated period with advance copy to the opposite party.
Put up for filing replication, if any, admission/ denial of
documents and framing of issues on 26-09-2025.
(PANKAJ ARORA)
District Judge-16, Central District,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi,
10-07-2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 246/25
Purushottam Banerjee
vs
Rohit Kohli
25.02.2025
Fresh case is received by way of E-filing. Let it be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Yogesh K. Chandna, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Submissions heard. Record perused.
Issue summons of the suit to the defendant through all
available modes including the electronic modes on filing PF & RC
returnable on 10.07.2025.
(Rajesh Malik)
District Judge-06, Central
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/25 .02.2025
v
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 39 CS DJ 246/25
Purushottam Banerjee Vs. Rohit Kohli
23-09-2026
Present: Ms. Lata, Proxy Counsel for plaintiff (appeared through VC).
Ms. Prity Raz, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Adjournment is sought on behalf of the plaintiff stating that father of the plaintiff
is in critical medical condition, that is why the plaintiff is unable to attend the court
today. Evidence by way of affidavit filed on behalf of the defendant. Copy thereof has
already been supplied to the opposite side. No medical record regarding illness of father
of the plaintiff placed on record. Even evidence by way of affidavit has not been filed on
behalf of the plaintiff. Accordingly, the plaintiff is burdened with the cost of Rs. 5,000/-
to be paid to the opposite party for delaying the matter.
List the matter for PE on 23.12.2026.
(PANKAJ ARORA)
District Judge-16, Central Distt.,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi,
23.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CSDJ No. 246/25
Purushottam Banerjee Vs. Rohit Kohli
01-07-2026
Present: Ms. Lata, proxy counsel for plaintiff through VC
Sh. Vinay Ahrodiya and Sh. Asim Akhtar, advocates
for defendant
Evidence affidavit not yet filed on behalf of plaintiff till
date. One last and final opportunity is granted to the plaintiff to
lead PE failing which a cost of Rs. 5000 shall be imposed upon
the plaintiff.
At request, put up for PE on 23-09-2026.
(PANKAJ ARORA)
District Judge-16, Central District,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/01-07-2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 10 CS DJ 246/25
Purushottam Banerjee Vs. Rohit Kohli
06.03.2026
Pr.: Sh. Yogesh K. Chandna and Ms. Lata, Ld. Counsels for the
plaintiff.
Ms. Prity Raz, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Replication alongwith affidavit of admission-denial of documents
filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Affidavit of admission-denial of
documents stated to have already been filed on behalf of the defendant.
On the basis of the pleadings following issues are being framed as
under: :
1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of a sum of
Rs.25,00,000/- as damages from the defendant? OPP.
2. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for
pendente-lite and future
interest on the above stated sum from the defendant? If so, at
what rate and for what period? OPP.
3. Any other Relief?
No other issue arises or pressed for.
Put up for PE on 01.07.2026. Both the parties are directed to file
their respective list of witnesses alongwith evidence affidavits within
fifteen days from today and exchange the copies with each other.
(PANKAJ ARORA)
District Judge-16, Central Distt.,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi,
06.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 CS DJ 246/25
Purushottam Banerjee Vs. Rohit Kohli
24.12.2025
Pr.: Sh. Yogesh K Chandna, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ms. Preeti Raz, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Some more time sought on behalf of the plaintiff for filing the
replication. Let the same be filed on or before next date of hearing with
advance copy to the opposite party.
Both the parties are directed to file their respective affidavits of
admission-denial of documents with advance copy to opposite party.
Put up for filing of replication, if any, admission-denial of
documents and framing of issues on 06.03.2026.
(PANKAJ ARORA)
District Judge-16, Central Distt.,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi,
24.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CSDJ No. 246/25
Purushottam Banerjee Vs. Rohit Kohli
26-09-2025
Present: Sh. Yogesh K. Chandna, advocate for plaintiff
Ms. Prity Raz and Ms. Sonu Kumari, advocates for
defendant
Written statement along with application u/s 151 of CPC
for condonation of delay in filing the WS filed. Copy supplied.
Heard on the application for condonation of delay in filing
the WS.
It is submtted on behalf of defendant that there is delay of
47 days in filing the WS as copy of plaint was received by them
on 22-07-2025. Vide order dated 10-07-2025, the plaintiff was
directed to supply the copy of plaint during the course of the day.
Since the plaintiff himself is at default, the delay in filing the
written statement is hereby condoned. The application u/s 151
CPC stands disposed of.
Put up for filing of replication, if any, admission/ denial of
documents and framing of issues on 24-12-2025.
(PANKAJ ARORA)
District Judge-16, Central District,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/26-09-2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CSDJ No. 246/25
Purushottam Banerjee Vs. Rohit Kohli
10-07-2025
File has been received by way of transfer from the court of
Sh. Rajesh Malik, Ld. District Judge-06, Central Distt., Tis
Hazari Courts in view of Order No. 15/D-3/Gaz.IA/DHC/ 2025
dated 30.05.2025 of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.
Present: Ms. Lata, advocate for plaintiff
Sh. Nityanand Singh, advocate for defendant
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant.
It is submitted by ld. Counsel for defendant that copy of
plaint has not yet been received by the defendant. Nor he has
received physical copy of summons. Let copy of plaint be
supplied during the course of the day. Ld. Counsel for defendant
submits that he has already shared his mobile number with Ld.
Counsel for plaintiff.
The defendant is directed to file written statement within
the stipulated period with advance copy to the opposite party.
Put up for filing replication, if any, admission/ denial of
documents and framing of issues on 26-09-2025.
(PANKAJ ARORA)
District Judge-16, Central District,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi,
10-07-2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 246/25
Purushottam Banerjee
vs
Rohit Kohli
25.02.2025
Fresh case is received by way of E-filing. Let it be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Yogesh K. Chandna, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Submissions heard. Record perused.
Issue summons of the suit to the defendant through all
available modes including the electronic modes on filing PF & RC
returnable on 10.07.2025.
(Rajesh Malik)
District Judge-06, Central
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/25 .02.2025
v
-- 1 of 1 --