Full Order Text
Order 20 · 30 Jul 2026 · CNR DLCT010027042024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 1 / 4 IA 1/2026 State Vs. Mukesh Kumar Mandal FIR No. 393/2023 PS Roop Nagar Under Section 302/201 IPC 30.07.2026 Video conferencing facility is active throughout the proceedings during the day. This is an application under Section 483 BNSS for grant of bail moved on behalf of the applicant/ accused Mukesh Kumar Mandal. Present: Sh. Pankaj Bhatia, Ld. Addl. PP for the State. Sh. Vikas Kumar, Ld. counsel for the applicant/accused. IO/Inspector Manoj Kumar in person. Reply filed. Taken on record. Copy supplied. Arguments heard. List for orders at 4.00 p.m. (SHILPI JAIN) ASJ-02, Central, THC Delhi/30.07.2026 At 4:00 p.m. ORDER ON THE BAIL APPLICATION: Vide this order, this Court shall decide upon the bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the applicant/accused Mukesh Kumar Mandal. -- 1 of 4 -- 2 / 4 1. It is averred in the application that applicant/accused is law abiding citizen of India and has been falsely implicated in this case and he is running in judicial custody. 2. It is also averred that investigation is complete, charge- sheet has already been filed, trial will take its own time and charge has already been framed. 3. It is also averred that applicant/accused is having clean antecedents, statement of only eye-witness shows that deceased herself has attempted to commit suicide and applicant/accused tried to save her life and there is no intention or motive attributed to applicant/accused. 4. It is also averred that applicant/accused undertakes to appear on each and every date and also undertakes to abide by the terms and conditions imposed by the Court and will not abscond or tamper with evidence, if granted bail and will furnish sound surety. It is thus prayed that the applicant/ accused be granted bail. 5. On the other hand, Ld. Addl. PP for the State duly assisted by the IO has vehemently opposed the present application on the ground that allegations are serious in nature and material witnesses are yet to be examined. It is further submitted that there is apprehension that applicant will flee from justice on being released. He prays for dismissal of the application. -- 2 of 4 -- 3 / 4 6. I have heard the submissions and perused the record carefully. 7. Perusal of the record reveals that applicant is charged with the offence under Section 302/201 IPC and matter is at the stage of PE. 8. Perusal of the reply filed on behalf of the IO reveals that as per the allegations, applicant/accused committed murder of his wife by inflicting multiple injuries on her body and thereafter, washed the floor of the premises in order to remove the blood stains lying over there. It further reveals that deceased sustained at least 14 injuries on her body and eye-witness is the minor daughter. It further reveals that after murder, applicant/accused eloped from the scene of the crime in the morning in the presence of public witnesses and he wanted to abscond to Nepal. It further reveals that his blood stained clothes have been recovered. It further reveals that there is apprehension that applicant/accused can jump the bail, can tamper with the evidence and can influence the witnesses on being released. 9. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, considering the gravity of offence, seriousness of the allegations levelled against the applicant/accused, role of applicant/accused, fact that material/public witnesses are yet to be examined, apprehension that applicant/accused can tamper with the evidence, can influence the witnesses and may jump the -- 3 of 4 -- 4 / 4 bail on being released and finding force in the submissions made by Ld. Addl. PP for the State and reply of IO, this Court is not inclined to enlarge accused/applicant Mukesh Kumar Mandal on bail at this stage. Accordingly, the present bail application stands dismissed and disposed of. 10. Needless to say, the above-mentioned observations are predicated solely on the facts as alleged, and brought forth at this juncture, and are not finding on merits, and would also have no bearing on the merits of the case. Copy of this order be sent to SHO concerned for information. Copy of this order be given dasti to the Ld. Counsel for accused as well as to the Ld. Prosecutor for record. (SHILPI JAIN) ASJ-02, Central, THC Delhi/30.07.2026 -- 4 of 4 --
