Order 2

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 42
SC 136/2026
STATE OF DELHI Vs. SALAUDDIN
FIR No. 403/2025
PS (Darya Ganj)
27.04.2026
Present: Sh. Deepak Kumar Jha, Ld. Addl. PP for the
State.
Sh. Jitender Shankar, AR of the complainant.
IO ASI Mukesh Chand in person.
File is perused. As per witnesses recorded during the
investigation, the photography and videography of the inspection
proceedings was carried by Parmod. He has been examined on
01.01.2026 and he stated that he has appeared in police station in
compliance of notice issued under Section 94 BNSS to him. He
stated that he is working as photographer with Sh. Sanjeev Kumar
of Arora Photo Studio. He also stated that his company gave under
Section 65 B (4) (C) Evidence Act Certificate and CD of
videography.
The IO is clueless about the negatives or the soft copy
of the photograghs affixed on page no. 22 of the Final Report. He
has not bothered to examine the witness qua the devices used by
him for the videography and their custody and maintenance. The
certificate at page no. 21 is signed by one Sanjeev Kumar.
The IO is also not able to clarify as to why a photocopy
of ID Cards/Aadhar Cards of prosecution witnesses is made part of
-- 1 of 2 --
..2..
the chargesheet. The copy of the entire chargesheet is to be given to
the accused and the supply of identity documents may compromise
the safety and privacy of the witnesses.
The facts and manner in which the investigation is
carried out are brought into the knowledge of DCP concerned by
whom the investigations are monitored, to assist the court in
appreciating the same for taking cognizance of the offence alleged.
Put up on 08.07.2026 awaiting the report/assistance
from the DCP for taking cognizance.
(Sunil Chaudhary)
Special Judge, Electricity-02,
Central/THC/Delhi/27.04.2026
-- 2 of 2 --