Order 21

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 18 CS DJ 160/23
MS. VEENU GUPTA Vs. MS. DIVYA GUPTA AND ANR.
30.03.2026
Pr.: Sh. Pankaj Singhal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Parveen Sharma and Sh. Mohit Jangra, Ld. Counsels for the
defendant.
Arguments heard on the application u/O. 6 Rule 17 CPC for
seeking amendment in the WS moved on behalf of the defendant.
It is submitted on behalf of the defendant that defendant wishes to
furnish clarification with respect to the certain documents which were
filed on behalf of the plaintiff specifically pursuant to the Order dated
07.11.2024 passed by the Ld. Predecessor of this Court.
On the other hand, application is strongly opposed on behalf of
the plaintiff on the ground that the documents which were filed by the
plaintiff pursuant to Order dated 07.11.2024, were already in the
knowledge of the defendant.
Since the defendant has filed his WS on account of change in
circumstances and only to give explanation with regard to the additional
documents filed on record by the plaintiff, in the opinion of this Court,
an opportunity has to be given to the defendant to clarify those
documents. Accordingly, application u/O. 6 Rule 17 CPC for seeking
amendment in the WS moved on behalf of the defendant stands allowed
and amended WS already filed on behalf of the defendant is taken on
record.
-- 1 of 2 --
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some time to file replication to
the amended WS. Let the same be filed on or before next date of hearing
with advance copy to the opposite party.
Subsequent thereto, both the parties are directed to file their
respective affidavits of admission-denial of documents and exchange the
copies with each other.
Put up for completion of pleadings, admission-denial of
documents and framing of issues on 24.04.2026.
(PANKAJ ARORA)
District Judge-16, Central Distt.,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi,
30.03.2026
-- 2 of 2 --