Interim Order 7

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 103/23
Hariom Vs Neeraj
06.03.2024
Present: Sh. Vipin Rana Ld Counsel for the plaintiff a/w plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
None has appeared on behalf of defendant.
Be awaited.
(Sachin Sood)
ADJ-01 (Central)
THC, Delhi/06.03.2024
At 12:05 PM.
Present: Sh. Vipin Rana Ld Counsel for the plaintiff a/w plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
Be awaited.
(Sachin Sood)
ADJ-01 (Central)
THC, Delhi/06.03.2024
At 2:40 PM.
Present: Sh. Vipin Rana Ld Counsel for the plaintiff a/w plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
Despite waiting since morning, none has appeared on behalf of
defendant. Perusal of the record shows that accompanying the leave to defend
application, an application u/s 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed seeking
condonation of delay of a period of 30 days in filing to leave to defend application.
Even on the LDOH post lunch session nobody had entered appearance
on behalf of the defendant. Although the callous conduct of the defendant does not
warrant any indulgence in so far as application u/s 5 is concerned and as stated
nobody has appeared on behalf of the defendant despite repeated calls since
-- 1 of 2 --
morning. However in the interest of justice and subject to a cost of Rs 4,000/- last
and final opportunity is granted to the defendant to address arguments on the
application u/s 5 of the Limitation Act. It is made clear that in case the arguments
are not addressed on the NDOH or the defendant does not appear on the NDOH the
application u/s 5 of the Limitation Act shall be dealt with in accordance with law
without any further opportunity.
Re-notify the matter for further proceedings on 27.03.2024.
(Sachin Sood)
ADJ-01 (Central)
THC, Delhi/06.03.2024
-- 2 of 2 --