Bal KishanVsMR DHANESH MITTAL

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN Vs.
MR DHANESH MITTAL
30.03.2026
Pr: None for the plaintiff.
Mr. Subhash Chawla, Ld. counsel for the defendant.
It is submitted that that in view of order of Hon’ble Court
in CM (M) No.1642/2025 & CM No.53472/2025, the present
matter has been stayed and the next date therein is 04.08.2026.
Renotify the matter for further proceedings on
10.08.2026.
(Anil Antil)
District Judge, Commercial Court-09,
Central, THC, Delhi
30.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN Vs. MR DHANESH MITTAL
26.11.2025
Pr: Sh. Rishabh, proxy counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Subhash Chawla, Ld. counsel for the defendant has
joined through video conferencing.
Order of Hon’ble Court in CM (M) No. 1642/2025 & CM
No. 53472/2025, 53471/2025 has been received as per which the
proceedings of this case has been stayed by the Hon’ble High
Court till the next date of hearing i.e. 11.02.26.
Accordingly, put up for further proceedings on 23.02.26.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 26.11.25
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN
Vs.
MR DHANESH MITTAL
11.09.2025
Present: Sh. Rishabh Jain, Ld. Proxy counsel for the counsel
for the plaintiff.
Sh. Subhash Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
(joined through VC)
Adjournment is sought on behalf of the Ld counsel
for the defendant on the ground that he is in personal difficulty
and he has not been in a position to argue on the application
under Section VII Rule 14 (3) CPC moved on behalf of the
plaintiff for seeking leave to file additional documents.
It is further stated by Ld. Counsel for the defendant
that the order of this court dated 29.07.2025 has been challenged
before Hon’ble High Court of Delhi where the matter will be
taken up on 29.10.2025.
Admittedly, there is no stay in the present case. Final
opportunity is granted for argument on this application.
Accordingly, put up for argument on this application
now on 08.10.2025.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :11.09.2025
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
Sh. Bal Kishan
Vs.
Sh. Dhanesh Mittal
25.08.2025
Present: None for the plaintiff.
Ld. Proxy counsel for the counsel for the defendant
(joined through VC)
Reply has been filed on behalf of the defendant on
the application of the plaintiff under Order VII Rule 14 (3) CPC
seeking leave to file additional documents.
Put up for arguments on this application on
11.09.2025.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :22.08.2025
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN
Vs.
MR DHANESH MITTAL
29.07.2025
Present: Ms. Kalpana Jain, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Subhash Chawla, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
(joined through VC)
Arguments heard on the application of the defendant
under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Put up for orders at 2:00 p.m.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :29.07.2025
2:00 pm
Present: Ms. Kalpana Jain, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Subhash Chawla, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
(joined through VC)
Vide separate order announced in the open court the
application moved on behalf of the defendant under Order VII Rule
11 CPC has no merit and the same is dismissed.
An application under Order VII Rule 14 (3) read with
Section 151 CPC has been moved on behalf of the plaintiff for
seeking leave to file certain additional documents. It is stated that
copy has already been supplied to the other side. Let reply, if any, be
filed within three weeks with copy to the other side.
Put up for arguments on this application on
25.08.2025.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :29.07.2025
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN Vs. MR DHANESH MITTAL
29.05.2025
Pr: Ms. Rajni Sharma, proxy counsel for counsel for the
plaintiff.
Sh. Subhash Chawla, Ld. counsel for the defendant.
Adjourment is sought on behalf of plaintiff as main
counsel is not available today.
Put up for arguments on the application of the defendant
U/O VII Rule 11 CPC on 29.07.25.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 29.05.25
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN Vs. MR DHANESH MITTAL
23.04.2025
Pr: Sh. Kamal, proxy counsel for the counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Subhash Chawla, Ld. counsel for the defendant has
joined through video conferencing.
Written statement has already been filed on behalf of
defendant.
Let replication, if any, be filed positively within four
weeks.
Reply has been filed on behalf of plaintiff to the
application of the defendant U/O VII Rule 11 CPC.
Adjournment is sought on behalf of plaintiff on the ground
that main counsel is not available today.
So, put up for arguments on the application on 29.05.25.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 23.04.25
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN
Vs.
MR DHANESH MITTAL
27.03.2025
Present: Ms. Kalpana Jain, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
(joined through VC)
Sh. Subhash Chawla, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
An application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC has
been filed on behalf of the defendant.
Let reply to this application be filed positively
within three weeks.
It is further stated by ld. Counsel for the defendant
that defendant was served on 14.03.2025 and the written
statement shall be filed within stipulated period. Be filed with
copy to the other side.
Accordingly, put up on 23.04.2025.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :27.03.2025
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN Vs. MR DHANESH MITTAL
17.03.2025
Pr: Ms. Kalpana Jain, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff along with
plaintiff has joined through video conferencing.
Summons has been issued to the defendant by registered
post as well as by courier. No report has been received back.
Ld. counsel seeks time to file the tracking report in respect
of the summons issued to the defendant by registered post as well
as by courier. Be filed before the next date of hearing.
Accordingly, put up on 27.03.25.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 17.03.25
At 2.30 pm
At this stage, someone joined the video conferencing on
behalf of defendant stating himself to be the counsel for the
defendant. He sought time to take steps.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 17.03.25
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN Vs. MR DHANESH MITTAL
27.01.2025
Pr: Ms. Kalpana Jain, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff.
Issue summons of the suit to the defendant on filing of
PF/RC/Speed Post & approved courier as well as through
electronic mode returnable for the next date of hearing. Steps be
taken within a week.
Put up on 17.03.25.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 27.01.25
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
Sh. Bal Kishan
Vs.
Sh. Dhanesh Mittal
20.01.2025
Fresh suit for recovery of Rs.13,54,924/- with interest has
been received through e.filing. It be checked and registered.
Present: None for the plaintiff.
Put up for consideration on 27.01.2025.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :20.01.2025
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN Vs. MR DHANESH MITTAL
10.08.2026
Pr: Sh. Rishabh Jain, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff has joined
through video conferencing.
Sh. Subhash Chawla, Ld. counsel for the defendant has
joined through video conferencing.
It is submitted that Hon’ble High Court has extended the
stay in the present matter, which is now listed on 12.01.2027 for
arguments before the Hon’ble High Court.
Accordingly, re-notify for further proceedings on
18.01.2027.
(Anil Antil)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 10.08.26
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN Vs.
MR DHANESH MITTAL
30.03.2026
Pr: None for the plaintiff.
Mr. Subhash Chawla, Ld. counsel for the defendant.
It is submitted that that in view of order of Hon’ble Court
in CM (M) No.1642/2025 & CM No.53472/2025, the present
matter has been stayed and the next date therein is 04.08.2026.
Renotify the matter for further proceedings on
10.08.2026.
(Anil Antil)
District Judge, Commercial Court-09,
Central, THC, Delhi
30.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN Vs. MR DHANESH MITTAL
26.11.2025
Pr: Sh. Rishabh, proxy counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Subhash Chawla, Ld. counsel for the defendant has
joined through video conferencing.
Order of Hon’ble Court in CM (M) No. 1642/2025 & CM
No. 53472/2025, 53471/2025 has been received as per which the
proceedings of this case has been stayed by the Hon’ble High
Court till the next date of hearing i.e. 11.02.26.
Accordingly, put up for further proceedings on 23.02.26.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 26.11.25
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN
Vs.
MR DHANESH MITTAL
11.09.2025
Present: Sh. Rishabh Jain, Ld. Proxy counsel for the counsel
for the plaintiff.
Sh. Subhash Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
(joined through VC)
Adjournment is sought on behalf of the Ld counsel
for the defendant on the ground that he is in personal difficulty
and he has not been in a position to argue on the application
under Section VII Rule 14 (3) CPC moved on behalf of the
plaintiff for seeking leave to file additional documents.
It is further stated by Ld. Counsel for the defendant
that the order of this court dated 29.07.2025 has been challenged
before Hon’ble High Court of Delhi where the matter will be
taken up on 29.10.2025.
Admittedly, there is no stay in the present case. Final
opportunity is granted for argument on this application.
Accordingly, put up for argument on this application
now on 08.10.2025.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :11.09.2025
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
Sh. Bal Kishan
Vs.
Sh. Dhanesh Mittal
25.08.2025
Present: None for the plaintiff.
Ld. Proxy counsel for the counsel for the defendant
(joined through VC)
Reply has been filed on behalf of the defendant on
the application of the plaintiff under Order VII Rule 14 (3) CPC
seeking leave to file additional documents.
Put up for arguments on this application on
11.09.2025.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :22.08.2025
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN
Vs.
MR DHANESH MITTAL
29.07.2025
Present: Ms. Kalpana Jain, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Subhash Chawla, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
(joined through VC)
Arguments heard on the application of the defendant
under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Put up for orders at 2:00 p.m.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :29.07.2025
2:00 pm
Present: Ms. Kalpana Jain, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Subhash Chawla, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
(joined through VC)
Vide separate order announced in the open court the
application moved on behalf of the defendant under Order VII Rule
11 CPC has no merit and the same is dismissed.
An application under Order VII Rule 14 (3) read with
Section 151 CPC has been moved on behalf of the plaintiff for
seeking leave to file certain additional documents. It is stated that
copy has already been supplied to the other side. Let reply, if any, be
filed within three weeks with copy to the other side.
Put up for arguments on this application on
25.08.2025.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :29.07.2025
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN Vs. MR DHANESH MITTAL
29.05.2025
Pr: Ms. Rajni Sharma, proxy counsel for counsel for the
plaintiff.
Sh. Subhash Chawla, Ld. counsel for the defendant.
Adjourment is sought on behalf of plaintiff as main
counsel is not available today.
Put up for arguments on the application of the defendant
U/O VII Rule 11 CPC on 29.07.25.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 29.05.25
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN Vs. MR DHANESH MITTAL
23.04.2025
Pr: Sh. Kamal, proxy counsel for the counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Subhash Chawla, Ld. counsel for the defendant has
joined through video conferencing.
Written statement has already been filed on behalf of
defendant.
Let replication, if any, be filed positively within four
weeks.
Reply has been filed on behalf of plaintiff to the
application of the defendant U/O VII Rule 11 CPC.
Adjournment is sought on behalf of plaintiff on the ground
that main counsel is not available today.
So, put up for arguments on the application on 29.05.25.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 23.04.25
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN
Vs.
MR DHANESH MITTAL
27.03.2025
Present: Ms. Kalpana Jain, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
(joined through VC)
Sh. Subhash Chawla, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
An application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC has
been filed on behalf of the defendant.
Let reply to this application be filed positively
within three weeks.
It is further stated by ld. Counsel for the defendant
that defendant was served on 14.03.2025 and the written
statement shall be filed within stipulated period. Be filed with
copy to the other side.
Accordingly, put up on 23.04.2025.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :27.03.2025
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN Vs. MR DHANESH MITTAL
17.03.2025
Pr: Ms. Kalpana Jain, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff along with
plaintiff has joined through video conferencing.
Summons has been issued to the defendant by registered
post as well as by courier. No report has been received back.
Ld. counsel seeks time to file the tracking report in respect
of the summons issued to the defendant by registered post as well
as by courier. Be filed before the next date of hearing.
Accordingly, put up on 27.03.25.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 17.03.25
At 2.30 pm
At this stage, someone joined the video conferencing on
behalf of defendant stating himself to be the counsel for the
defendant. He sought time to take steps.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 17.03.25
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
BAL KISHAN Vs. MR DHANESH MITTAL
27.01.2025
Pr: Ms. Kalpana Jain, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff.
Issue summons of the suit to the defendant on filing of
PF/RC/Speed Post & approved courier as well as through
electronic mode returnable for the next date of hearing. Steps be
taken within a week.
Put up on 17.03.25.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 27.01.25
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 92/25
Sh. Bal Kishan
Vs.
Sh. Dhanesh Mittal
20.01.2025
Fresh suit for recovery of Rs.13,54,924/- with interest has
been received through e.filing. It be checked and registered.
Present: None for the plaintiff.
Put up for consideration on 27.01.2025.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :20.01.2025
r
-- 1 of 1 --