Order 10

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: SC 45/2025
STATE Vs. VIKRAM etc.
FIR No.205/2024
PS (Roop Nagar)
10.03.2026
Present: Sh. Alok Saxena, Ld. CPP for the State.
Accused Vikram and Aman produced from JC.
Sh. Satish Kumar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for both the
accused.
Arguments on charge have been heard.
Ld. CPP for the State submitted that there is
sufficient material on record to frame charge u/s 333 r.w. Section
3(5) BNS, 110 r.w. Section 3(5), 115 r.w. Section 3(5), 140
r.w.Section 3(5) and Section 310 BNS against both the accused.
Ld. CPP further submits that charge u/s 311 and 317
(3) BNS is liable to be framed against accused Vikram.
Ld. Counsel for the accused, on the other hand,
submitted that the accused persons have been falsely implicated
and they had no intention to commit murder of the complainant.
Hence, they are liable to be discharged.
I have considered the rival submissions and have
gone through the file.
On 27.08.2024, a PCR call was received regarding a
firing incident. On reaching the spot, it was found that injured
Ram Mehar was admitted to Hindu Rao Hospital. The present
FIR was registered on the statement of injured / complainant
Ram Mehar that his Bhanja Amit had a dispute with his younger
brother Ankit regarding sharing of sale proceeds of a land. On the
day of the incident at about 7:30 a.m, Aman along with his friend
Vikram and some other persons forcibly entered his house and
-- 1 of 3 --
started inquiring about Amit. They all were armed with a pistol
like weapon. Aman was saying that he will kill Amit. The
complainant tried to make him understand but Aman hit him with
the butt of the pistol. The said persons took away Amit with
them. While leaving, they also took away two mobile phones of
Apple make and a mobile phone of Samsung make.
During investigation, CCTV footage of the incident
was collected and it was found that five boys had visited the spot.
The other victim Amit and his mother Veermati were joined in
investigation. Victim Amit informed that on the day of incident,
Aman along with Vikram and three other persons came inside his
house after breaking the door; they had pointed a pistol on Rahul;
when he raised alarm, he too was caught hold of and Aman,
Vikram and others pointed a pistol at him as well. One of the
persons who was being referred to as Pandit snatched his Vivo
phone and they took him away after dragging him down the
stairs. Aman and Vikram were planning to kill him and throw his
body in a canal. He was taken to Jind.
During further investigation, the CCTV footage of
Toll Plaza, the barrier of which was broken by the vehicle in
which the victim was taken was obtained; a vehicle used in
commission of the offence was seized; GPS report of the vehicle
was obtained; statement of eye witnesses were recorded; CCTV
footage of the place of the incident were obtained; accused were
arrested and after completion of the investigation, chargesheet
was filed in the Court.
On the basis of the FIR, the investigation carried out
-- 2 of 3 --
and statement of witnesses, there is sufficient material on record
to frame charge u/s 333 r.w. Section 3(5) BNS, 110 r.w. Section
3(5), 115 r.w. Section 3(5), 140 r.w.Section 3(5) and Section 310
BNS against both the accused and u/s 311 & 317(3) BNS against
accused Vikram.
Charge framed. Put up for PE on 17.04.2026.
PW Ram Mehar be summoned for the said date.
(Nishant Garg)
ASJ-06 (Central),
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
10.03.2026
-- 3 of 3 --