Skip to main content
Court Order

Interim Order 13

CNR DLCT01001006202506 Jun 2026
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Interim Order 13 · 06 Jun 2026 · CNR DLCT010010062025

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: FIR No.205/24
PS Roop Nagar
State v.Aman
06.06.2026
Present: Sh. Alok Saxena, Ld. CPP for the State.
Sh. Abhay Kumar and Sh.Satish Kumar, Ld.
Counsel for applicant / accused Aman.
Deputed IO SI Harshit Apoorva in person.
Arguments heard. Put up for orders at 4:00 p.m.
(Nishant Garg)
ASJ-06 (Central),
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
06.06.2026
At 4:00 p.m.
ORDER
By way of the instant application, accused / applicant
Aman is seeking bail u/s 483 BNSS. The bail application is
contested by the prosecution
Ld. Counsel for applicant /accused submitted that he has
been falsely implicated; that he is in custody since 08.01.2025;
that the complainant and other witnesses have not supported the
prosecution case. Hence, he be granted bail.
Ld. CPP for the State, on the other hand, submitted that
allegations against the applicant /accused are grave and serious in
nature. Hence, bail application be dismissed.
I have considered the rival submissions and have gone
through the case file.
On 27.08.2024, a PCR call was received regarding a firing
incident. On reaching the spot, it was found that injured Ram
Mehar was admitted to Hindu Rao Hospital. The present FIR was
-- 1 of 4 --
-2-
registered on the statement of injured / complainant Ram Mehar
that his Bhanja Amit had a dispute with his younger brother
Ankit regarding sharing of sale proceeds of a land. On the day of
the incident at about 7:30 a.m, Aman along with his friend
Vikram and some other persons forcibly entered his house and
started inquiring about Amit. They all were armed with a pistol
like weapon. Aman was saying that he will kill Amit. The
complainant tried to make him understand but Aman hit him with
the butt of the pistol. The said persons took away Amit with
them. While leaving, they also took away two mobile phones of
Apple make and a mobile phone of Samsung make.
During investigation, CCTV footage of the incident was
collected and it was found that five boys had visited the spot. The
other victim Amit and his mother Veermati were joined in
investigation. Victim Amit informed that on the day of incident,
Aman along with Vikram and three other persons came inside his
house after breaking the door; they had pointed a pistol on Rahul;
when he raised alarm, he too was caught hold of and Aman,
Vikram and others pointed a pistol at him as well. One of the
persons who was being referred to as Pandit snatched his Vivo
phone and they took him away after dragging him down the
stairs. Aman and Vikram were planning to kill him and throw his
body in a canal. He was taken to Jind.
During further investigation, the CCTV footage of Toll
Plaza, the barrier of which was broken by the vehicle in which
the victim was taken was obtained; a vehicle used in
-- 2 of 4 --
-3-
commission of the offence was seized; GPS report of the vehicle
was obtained; statement of eye witnesses were recorded; CCTV
footage of the place of the incident were obtained; accused were
arrested and after completion of the investigation, chargesheet
was filed in the Court.
In their testimonies before the Court, complainant / PW1
Ram Mehar and victim PW3 Amit did not support the
prosecution case and completely resiled from their earlier
statements. They did not identify the accused persons as the
perpetrators of the crime in the Court. Similarly, PW2 Krishan
also expressed ignorance about the offence and denied that the
accused persons had come to the house of Ram Mehar or had
assaulted Amit.
Chargesheet has already been filed; complainant and other
witnesses have already been examined. No purpose will be
served by detaining the applicant / accused in custody.
Accordingly, applicant / accused Aman is admitted to bail on
furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one
surety in the like amount and subject to condition that :-
(i) That applicant/ accused shall not, directly or
indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to the
complainant or any person acquainted with the facts of
the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts
to the Court or to any police officer;
(ii) That applicant/ accused shall continue to appear on
each and every date of hearing before the Court.
(iii)That applicant/ accused shall not repeat the offence.
-- 3 of 4 --
-4-
Application stands disposed of accordingly.
Copy of the order be given dasti.
Copy of order be sent to concerned Jail.
(Nishant Garg)
ASJ-06 (Central),
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
06.06.2026
-- 4 of 4 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.