All Cases

Order - Status 8: 39-CAW-2247-2014-WP-4110-2003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2247 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4110 OF 2003 DADASAHEB GANGADHAR SHETE )...PETITIONER V/s. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER & ANR. )...RESPONDENTS Mr.Sagar Mane h/f. Mr.Narendra Bandiwadekar, Advocate for the Applicant. Coram: Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota, J. Date : : 28th October, 2014. P.C. : 1 No directions need be given for expeditious hearing of the petition since the petitions of the year 2003 have already come on board for final hearing. The civil application is, therefore, disposed off. Office to place the petition on board for final hearing as per the chronology. (Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2360 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.208 OF 2011 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...PETITIONER V/s. RAMCHANDRA V. CHINGALE & ANOTHER )...RESPONDENTS Mrs.S.D.Shinde APP for the Petitioner. CORAM: A.V.NIRGUDE, J. DATE : : 14th FEBRUARY, 2012. P.C. : In view of the dismissal of Writ Petition No.2360 of 2010, nothing survives in the pending Criminal Application no.208 of 2011. It therefore stands disposed off. (A.V.NIRGUDE, J.)

Order - Status 11: ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 536 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr. R.M.Haridas for the Applicant. Mr. N.P.Dalvi for the Respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 12th December, 2011. P.C. . The learned counsel appearing for the Applicant seeks permission to withdraw the revision application. Hence, the revision application is dismissed as withdrawn. [ A.S.OKA, J ]

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 23th APRIL 2015 P.C. : On account of paucity of time rest of the matters on Daily Board are adjourned to dates fixed as per the CMIS (Court Management Information System) which read as under: SR.NO NUMBER ADJOURNED DATE 2 ALP/46/2013 28/04/2015 4 APPA/838/2014 28/04/2015 5 APPA/131/2015 28/04/2015 6 APPA/483/2015 28/04/2015 8 APPLN/688/2014 28/04/2015 10 APEAL/408/2015 09/06/2015 11 APPLN/451/2013 05/05/2015 12 APPLN/529/2013 05/05/2015 13 APPLN/532/2013 05/05/2015 14 APEAL/794/1997 15/06/2015 15 APEAL/913/2004 15/06/2015 2 Interim orders, if any in force in any of the petitions/applications, till today, shall continue to remain in force till the next date fixed for such matter/matters. 3 In case of extreme urgency either of the parties may move the Court for production of papers before it. (ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 28th APRIL 2015 P.C. : On account of paucity of time rest of the matters on Daily Board are adjourned to dates fixed as per the CMIS (Court Management Information System) which read as under: SR.NO NUMBER ADJOURNED DATE 29 ALP/124/2015 09/06/2015 30 ALP/156/2015 09/06/2015 31 APEAL/311/2015 09/06/2015 33 APEAL/498/2015 16/06/2015 34 ALP/322/2013 16/06/2015 35 ALP/471/2013 16/06/2015 36 ALP/46/2013 16/06/2015 37 ALP/584/2013 16/06/2015 38 ALP/119/2014 16/06/2015 39 APPLN/695/2014 16/06/2015 40 APPLN/58/2015 16/06/2015 41 APPP/338/2015 08/05/2015 42 APPA/485/2015 08/05/2015 43 APEAL/612/2013 07/05/2015 44 APPA/838/2014 07/05/2015 45 APPA/1131/2014 12/06/2015 46 APPA/319/2015 12/06/2015 47 APEAL/330/2015 12/06/2015 48 APEAL/395/1995 16/06/2015 49 APEAL/1302/2004 16/06/2015 50 APEAL/19/2005 16/06/2015 2 Interim orders, if any in force in any of the petitions/applications, till today, shall continue to remain in force till the next date fixed for such matter/matters. 3 In case of extreme urgency either of the parties may move the Court for production of papers before it. (ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.838 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.84 OF 2013 Gulab Rambhai Rohit ... Applicant V/s. Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors. ... Respondents ..... Mrs.Mallika Ingale, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms.Krinjal Ahuja i/b. Mr.Rajesh Desia, Advocate for the Respondent/CBI. Ms.Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent/State. .... CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY J. DATED : 7TH MAY 2015 P.C. The learned counsel for the respondent/CBI prays for time to file a counter affidavit. Stand over to 19th June 2015 . To be listed along with appeal. (ABHAY M. THIPSAY J.)

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.838 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.84 OF 2013 Gulab Ramubhai Rohit ... Applicant V/s. Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.S.V.Marwadi i/b. Ms.Malika A. Ingale, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms.Rebecca Gonsalvez, Advocate for the Respondent No.1/CBI. Mrs.S.GajareDhumal, APP for the Respondent/State. .... ..... CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY J. DATED : 8TH OCTOBER 2015 P.C. The learned counsel for the respondent No.1/CBI prays for time. Granted finally. Stand over to 28th October 2015 . (ABHAY M. THIPSAY J.) CERTIFICATE Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment/Order.

Order - Status 16: 4-APPA-838-2014-APPEAL-84-2013.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.838 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.84 OF 2013 GULAB RAMBHAI ROHIT )...APPLICANT V/s. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.)...RESPONDENTS Shri S.V.Marwadi i/b. Smt.Mallika Ingale, Advocate for the Applicant. Smt.Rebecca Gonsalvez, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Smt.M.R.Tidke, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATE : 28th OCTOBER 2015. P.C. : 1 Shri S.V.Marwadi, learned counsel for the applicant, submits that he would urge that the appeal itself be listed for final hearing at an early date, and that, he would not press the present application. 2 After hearing Shri Marwadi and Smt.Rebecca Gonsalvez, the learned counsel for respondent no.1, it is directed that the appeal be listed for 'Final Hearing' on 8th December 2015. 3 In view of this, the application is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such. (ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.) CERTIFICATE Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment / Order.

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 1784 OF 2017 In WRIT PETITION 6942 OF 2016 Rajani Arvind Parchure ....Applicant V/S Shri. Narhari Mahadev Gole @ Badekar ....Respondent CORAM : G. S. KULKARNI, J DATE : 22nd December, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned as per CMIS date. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: Shailaja IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1784 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6942 OF 2016 Rajani Arvind Parchure ] Applicant Vs. Shri Narhari Mahadev Gole @ Bedekar ] Respondent ….. Mr. Sandesh Shukla a/w Mr. Amit Singh i/b Santosh Sawant, for Applicant. ….. CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J. DATE : 22ND MARCH, 2018. P.C. Heard Mr. Shukla, learned Counsel for the applicant. This is an application for bringing heirs and legal representatives of the petitioner on record. Office remark shows that the Civil Application is filed in time. For the reasons stated in the application, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) with no order as to costs. Leave to convert Writ Petition into Civil Revision Application is granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. At the request of Mr. Shukla, Writ Petition is taken up for admission. By this application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the petitioner hereinafter referred to 'plaintiff' has challenged the judgment and decree dated 28th October, 2013 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge, Sangli in Regular Civil Appeal No.197 of 2009. By that order, the learned District Judge allowed the appeal preferred by the appellant/defendant and dismissed the suit. The learned District Judge held that the defendant is in possession of the suit premises on the basis of oral agreement of sale of the year 2002. He submitted that Section 17 (1A) of the Registration Act, 1908 lays down that the documents containing contracts to transfer for consideration, any immovable property for the purpose of Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, shall be registered, if they have been executed on or after 24th September, 2001 and if such documents are not registered on or after such commencement then, they shall have no effect for the purpose of Section 53A of the Act. He submitted that the learned District Judge, therefore, was not justified in holding that the defendant is in possession of the suit premises on the basis of oral agreement of sale of 2002. In view of this submission, issue notice to the respondent returnable on 19th April, 2018. Parties are put to the notice that subject to the time constraint and convenience of the Court, Petition will be disposed of finally at the stage of admission. Notice shall further indicate that despite service if the respondents fail to appear, the Court will proceed to decide the petition on its own merits. In the meantime, call for record and proceedings. [R.G. KETKAR, J.]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 244 OF 2008 Dr. Gyanendra S.N. Singh .. Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.K.S. Patil for the applicant. Mrs.M.M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 30TH JANUARY 2008 P.C. : Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with the offence registered with Jogeshwari Police Station, Mumbai under C.R. No.196/2007 punishable under section 498-A, 323, 506, 504, 379, 377 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier application made by the applicant to the Sessions Court (Application No.24/2008) for bail has been rejected by an order dated 18th January 2008. The complainant is the wife of Arvind Pawar. The applicant is a friend of Arvind Pawar. In the FIR lodged by the complainant on 5th November 2007, she alleged that the complainant and her husband lived together for 5-6 months after the marriage. Thereafter there were quarrels between them. Hence she left the house. Thereafter her husband has been harassing her and on 1st October 2007 Arvind along with his three friends including the present applicant came to her house, assaulted her and took away gold mangalsutra weighing about 1 tola and 2 gold bangles weighing about 2 1/2 tolas. The complainant further alleges that in the past her husband had unnatural intercourse with her though she had not informed this to anyone. There is no allegation that the applicant is in any way concerned with the act of unnatural intercourse allegedly committed by the husband. In my view, the learned Sessions Judge has erred in assuming that the present applicant is also a party to the unnatural offence punishable under section 379 of the I.P.C. The only allegation against the applicant is that he accompanied the husband of the complainant on 1st October 2007 when she was allegedly robbed of one gold mangalsutra and 2 gold bangles. No specific role has been assigned to the applicant. There is no independent witness to the incident. There is a delay of more than a month in lodging the FIR after the alleged robbing. In the circumstances, the applicant is entitled to bail. Hence, I pass the following order:- ORDER In the event of arrest of the applicant in connection with the offence mentioned above, he shall be released on bail on executing personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount subject to the condition that the applicant shall not make any contact with the complainant and shall not in any way make any inducement or threat to any of the prosecution witnesses and shall attend the concerned police station as and when summoned by the police for the purpose of interrogation/ investigation. This order shall come to an end after the charge sheet is filed whereupon the applicant, if he so desires, may apply for regular bail before the regular court. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 244 OF 2008 Shri Abdul Rahim Tantray. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. S.V.Kotwal i/b. S.S.Bhandary for the applicant. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 2nd May 2008. P.C.: ---- . Heard. Perused record. The relaxation sought to be prayed by the applicant was already granted under order dated 1st February, 2008. The applicant has availed the benefit of that order. There cannot be successive relaxation in every alternate month. Application is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1105 OF 2015 Ghanshyam Jagannath Vishwakarma ... Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Ms. Priyanka S.Karnik, Advocate appointed ,for the applicant. Ms. P.P.Shinde, APP, for the State CORAM: SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV,J. DATE : 18th June, 2015. P.C . An application is received through jail. The applicant is praying for bail in Case No.253 of 2012 registered at Kandivli Police Station. This Court had requested the learned counsel Ms. Priyanka S. Karnik, to espouse the cause of the applicant. He has graciously accepted to do the same. Office to furnish copy of the application to the Advocate so appointed. The learned APP to take specific instructions in respect of the stage of the trial. S.O. 30.6.2015 (SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1105 OF 2015 Ghanshyam Jagannath Vishwakarma .....Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent None for Applicant Ms. P. P. Shinde APP for the State. CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J. DATED : 30th JUNE 2015 PC : Learned APP has placed on record the report showing that applicant herein has been enlarged on bail on 12/06/2015. It is also fairly submitted that applicant has attended Sessions Court on 18/06/2015. Report is taken on record and marked as article 'X' for the purpose of identification. In view of this, prayers in the application have become infructuous. Application stands disposed of in above terms. Office to communicate this order to the Sessions Court. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 4: SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Digitally signed by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2023.06.02 16:44:17 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant and Anr. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents ***** Mr.Mayank Joshi – Advocate for Applicants. Mr.Y.Y.Dabke – APP for the Respondent – State. ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : st 31 MAY, 2023 P. C. :- Mentioned out of turn. Learned Advocate for the Applicants seeks liberty to carry out an amendment in the Application. Liberty granted. It be carried out within a week. Copy be served on other side. Matter be kept on 13th June, 2023. [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant And Anr. APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Ors. RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHRIRAM MADHUSUDAN MODAK J DATE : 17th July, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 17/08/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant And Anr. APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Ors. RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHRIRAM MADHUSUDAN MODAK J DATE : 24th July, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 28/07/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant and Anr. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents ***** Mr. Mayank Joshi - Advocate for the Applicant Mr. H. J. Dedhia - APP for the Respondent/State ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 28th JULY, 2023 P. C. :- The Respondent No. 2 is department of the CGST. Recently, they have not been served about circulation. Matter be kept on 31st July, 2023, high on board. [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 13: +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant and Anr. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents ***** Mr.Mayank Joshi a/w Mr.Sumedh Sonawane and Mr.Parshva Bhankharia – Advocates for Applicants. Mr.H.J.Dedhia – APP for Respondent No.1 – State. Mr.Santosh Khedkar – Assistant Commissioner SGST–Mazgaon, Mumbai–INV–044. Mr.Rajendra Pisal – State Tax Officer–Thane–THA–SUR–C–002. ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATED : 31ST JULY 2023 P. C. : Heard learned Advocate for the Applicants. There is a preliminary objection taken by learned APP about placing this Application before the concerned Court. According to him, Thane Office of Sales Tax Department is not going to lodge prosecution but Competent Authority is the Mazgaon Office – Mumbai. With their assistance, my attention is invited to the following three documents :- (a) A show cause notice issued for cancellation of registration on Page No.22 dated 7th September, 2022. (b) Summons issued by Assistant Commissioner of State Tax – Mazgaon, Mumbai dated 31st March, 2023 on Page No.25 wherein, the Applicant was directed to remain present for recording statement under Section 70 of MGST Act. (c) A show cause notice for cancellation of registration dated 26th April, 2023 issued by Thane Office (Page No.31). Learned APP after taking instructions submitted that Thane Office is not going to initiate any prosecution against the Applicant. The statement is accepted. In view of that, the subject does not fall within the assignment of this Court. So, only apprehension remains is on the basis of summons issued by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax – Mazgaon. In respect of that apprehension, let Office to place it before Appropriate Bench. [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant and Anr. … Applicants versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents None for Applicants. Mr. R.M.Pethe, APP for State. CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J. DATE : 8 SEPTEMBER 2023 P.C. None appears for the Applicants when called out. Stand over to 12 October 2023. ( N.J.JAMADAR, J. ) SSP 1/1

Order - Status 18: 4-ABA-1486-23.DOC Sayali Upasani IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant and Others ...Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents None for Applicants. Mr. M. G. Patil, APP for State. CORAM:- N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED:- 12th OCTOBER, 2023 PC:- None present for the applicants. None had appeared for the applicants on 8th September, 2023 as well. The application stands dismissed for want of prosecution. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] Signed by: Sayali D Upasani Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 13/10/2023 11:46:26 1/1