All Cases

Order - Status 4: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 6: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 8: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 9: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 10: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 12: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 16: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 18: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 21: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 22: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 23: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 26: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 28: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 30: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 32: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 35: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 37: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.829 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.716 OF 2008 Shyam Bhaskar Badme )..Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. )..Respondents ---- Mrs.Anjali Patil for the applicant. Mr.A.S.Shitole APP for the State. Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Date : 26.9.2008 PC This is an application for grant of bail. The applicant has been convicted for an offence punishable under Section 376 of IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for 7 years. I have perused the R & P. I find that the girl in question was a retarded girl. She has immediately disclosed the offence to her mother. C.A. report shows semen in vaginal smear as well as in the vulval swabs. Semen is also detected on the clothes of the victim. Semen belonged to 'O' group which is the group of the accused. The group of the victim is 'A' and her blood is also detected on the clothes. Though the matter has been admitted, the girl being retarded, in my view, this is not a fit case to grant of bail. Application is therefore, rejected. However, hearing of the appeal is expedited. R & P to be sent back immediately for preparation of paper book. Liberty to apply for early date of hearing after receipt of paper book. (R.S.Mohite,J)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 696 OF 2014 Shashikant Chandrakant Rane … Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr. R. Sathyanarayanan, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. A.A. Mane, APP for the State. CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 17th June, 2014. P.C. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the police from Mulund Police Station have arrested the applicant/accused, hence this Application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous and so he wants to withdraw this Application. Hence, the Application for the anticipatory bail is dismissed as withdrawn. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1647 OF 2021 Ashok Gena Sarwade .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent … … Mr.Vikrant V. Phatate for the Applicant. Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, APP for the State. CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 17th JULY, 2021 P.C:- On showing disinclination to grant the relief as prayed for, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application. Leave granted. Application stands dismissed as withdrawn. SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J M.M.Salgaonkar

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.4796 OF 2010 Shamrao Mahadev Phate : Petitioner V/s. The Collector & District Election Officer, Solapur & Ors. : Respondents .... Mr.S.S.Salunkhe for the petitioner. Mr.S.N.Patil, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for respondent nos.1 & 2. .... CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATE : JUNE 23, 2010. P.C.: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner orally seeks permission to implead Solapur District Central Co-operative Bank as a partyrespondent. Leave granted. Appropriate amendment in the cause title be carried out forthwith. Notice before admission, returnable on 12.7.2010. Mr.Patil, the learned Asstt. Govt. Pleader, waives service for the respondent nos.1 & 2. (D.D. SINHA, J.) (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.4796 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Mr.S.S.Salunkhe for the petitioner. Mr.S.N.Patil, AGP for resp. nos.1 & 2. Mr.Sarag Aryadha for respondent no.3. Mr.S.S.Inamdar for respondent no.4. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE : JULY 09, 2010. P.C.: Considering the cause of action involved, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to mention the matter before the appropriate Court. Permission granted. (D.D. SINHA, J.) (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1 WRIT PETITION NO.4796 OF 2010 Petitioner Respondents Mr.S.S.Rajeshirke for petitioner. Mr.S.N.Bhosale, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr.Sarang Aradhye for respondent no.3. Mr.Inamdar for respondent no.4. CORAM : R.V.MORE, J. DATE : 12th July 2010 PC : Not on on board. In view of urgency, the production is allowed and matter is taken on board. Heard Mr.Rajeshirke for the petitioner, Mr.Aradhye for respondent no.3, Mr.Inamdar for respondent no.4 and Mr.Bhosale, learned AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2. The petition pertains to the election of respondent no.4 The Solapur District Central Co-operative Bank Limited, Solapur (hereinafter referred to as "the said bank"). The Gardi Vividh Karyakari Society Ltd; Gardi (hereinafter referred to as "the Vividh Karyakari Society Ltd.") is the member of respondent no.4. The said Vividh Karyakari Society Ltd. passed a resolution on 20th March 2010 thereby nominating the respondent no.3 as it's delegate to take part in the general election of respondent no.4 bank. The resolution was sent to the respondent no.4 bank by the said Vividh Karyakari Society Ltd. and respondent no.3's name was shown in provisional voters list as a delegate of said Vividh Karyakari Society Ltd.. The petitioner contends that a resolution came to be passed by the said Vividh Karyakari Society Ltd. on 24th March 2010 thereby nominating him as a delegate of the said Vividh Karyakari Society Ltd.. In spite of this resolution, his name is not entered into the provisional voters list. An objection was raised before the Collector, however, the same was rejected only on the ground that the signature of the Secretary of the said Society does not appear on the resolution. By order dated 18th March 2010, the learned Collector rejected the petitioner's petitioner for non inclusion of his name in the provisional voters list as a delegate of the said Vividh Karyakari Society Ltd.. The final voters list thereafter was published in the month of May 2010 and against the name of said Vividh Karyakari Society Ltd; the name of respondent no.3 is shown as it's delegate. Rule 16 programme was subsequently published on 3rd July 2010 and the last date for filing the nomination is today. The election is at an advanced stage. The petitioner, in spite of rejection of objection by the Collector on 18th May 2010, filed present petition on 18th June 2010 i.e. after nearly about one month. The petitioner is guilty of laches. Apart from these facts, admittedly there are two resolutions passed by the said Vividh Karyakari Society Ltd; one in favour of respondent no.3 and another in favour of the petitioner. The respondent no.4 bank acted upon the resolution of the said Society wherein respondent no.3 was nominated as a delegate. The relevant question would be, which, out of the two resolutions, is the valid resolution. The validity of said two resolutions can be gone into by the Co-operative Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the validity of the said resolution along with the out-come of the election. Taking totality of the circumstances into consideration, I am of the opinion that the petition is devoid of any substance and deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. (R.V.MORE, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION P.I.L NO. 102 OF 2015 (Dayanand Kallappa Sonage Vs. Tukaram Munde, The Distt. Collector, Solapur & others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Office appearances, ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Court's or Judge's orders ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Mr. M.A. Choudhari Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.P. Kakde, A.G.P. for the State. Mr. S.B. Sheture Advocate for respondent no. 3. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND S.B. SHUKRE, JJ. DATED : 24th June 2015. P.C. : Leave to correct names of respondents 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Notice returnable on 30.6.2015. AGP waives notice for respondent/State. We direct the Collector, Solapur, to take notice of the allegations made in the petition. Responsible officer to remain present with record. High on board. (S.B. SHUKRE, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) Tanvir Ahmed PS

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 102 OF 2015 Shri Dayanand Kallappa Sonage Petitioners V/s. The District Collector, Solapur & others Respondents Mr. M.A. Choudhari for the petitioner. Mr. P.P. Kakade, AGP for the State. Mr. Virendra Pethe a/w. Sarang Aaradhye for respondent no.11. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND S.B. SHUKRE, JJ **.** 1 st July, 2015. P.C. Affidavit-in-reply is filed on behalf of respondent no.1 through Mr. Shravan Shrirang Kshirsagar, Sub-Divisional Officer, Mangalwedha, Dist. Solapur. Paragraph 9 of the reply states as under:- " With reference to para no. 12 of the P.I.L., I say and submit that the contents of the said para are not true and correct and not admitted by the Respondents. I say and submit that the contents of the said para are not true and correct and not admitted by the Respondents. I say and submit that Respondent No.11 was found excavating and from the sathas with the help of boats, suction pumps and with the help of other machines during the period 30.3.3015 to 17.04.2015 and this fact was noticed by the Tahsildar, Mangalwedha, and imposed a fine of Rs. 2,06,43,000/- upon the Respondent No. 11." In view of this statement made on oath we direct the Collector, Solapur to take urgent, stringent steps to prevent any party including respondent no.1 from excavating sand with the help of boats, suction pumps and with the help of machines which are not permitted under the policy of the State. The Collector is directed to take appropriate decision in accordance with policy of the State. We further direct the Collector to call for explanation from the subordinate officers in respect of alleged illegal excavation. Learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.11 seeks sometime as copy of the petition has not been served on him. Stand over for two weeks. Registry to forward the copy of order by fastest mode of communication to the Collector, Solapur. (S.B. SHUKRE, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) L.S. Panjwani, P.S.

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 102 OF 2015 Shri Dayanand Kallappa Sonage. Petitioner. V/s. The District Collector, Solapur and others. Respondents. M.A.Choudhary for the petitioner. P.P.Kakade, AGP for the State. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND S.B. SHUKRE, JJ. DATED : 16th July 2015. P.C. : Learned A.G.P. submits that consequent to the orders passed by this Court illegal excavation of sand has been prevented due to intervention of Collector, Solapur. It is submitted that the Collector has taken serious note and imposed fine of Rs.2 crore against the persons excavating sand illegally. We direct the Collector to monitor as to whether such lapses are occurring in any other parts of the district. The officers, who are deputed to visit site, shall be given adequate police protection of armed guards. We direct the Police Commissioner, Solapur to provide necessary protection to such officers on the request made by the Collector. An affidavit be filed in respect of steps taken consequent to the orders passed by this Court. Stand over for two weeks, i.e. 31st July 2015. H.B.

Order - Status 11: skn 1/1 102.15pil IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION PIL NO. 102 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Court's or Judge's orders Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ M.A.Choudhari for the petitioner. P.P.Kakade, AGP for the State. S.S.Kanetkar for respondent No.11. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND S.B. SHUKRE, JJ. DATED : 31st July 2015. P.C. : The learned A.G.P. has placed on record affidavit filed Shri Tukaram Mundhe, Collector, Solapur. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.11 seeks accommodation to file reply. Stand over to 5th August 2015. Learned A.G.P. to take instructions in respect of communication made by the Collectorate to the State Government regarding use of suction pumps for excavation of sand. (S.B. SHUKRE, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) Sanjay Nanoskar, P.S.

Order - Status 18: mnm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 102 OF 2015 Dayanand Kallappa Sonage ...Petitioner Vs. The District Collector, Solapur & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Mahadeo A. Chaudhari, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S.S. Kanetkar, Advocate for Respondent No.11 Mr. Asif Patel, AGP for Respondent Nos. 6 to 10 and 12 & 13 CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 20TH JUNE, 2016 P.C. : In view of the reply dated 1st July, 2015 filed by the Respondent State supported by Compliance Affidavit Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the cause of action does not survive. In view of the said statement this Petition is disposed of accordingly. (M.S. KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)

Order - Status 4: Megha 7_ia_1763_2023.doc MEGHA S PARAB Digitally signed by MEGHA S PARAB Date: 2023.05.04 16:41:31 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1763 OF 2023 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1340 OF 2023 Ramesh Jamdade ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents ... Mr. Sadip Pareikh with Mr. Prabhakar Jadhav for the Applicant/Intervenor Mr. Ritesh Thobde with Mr. Sagar Tambe for the Applicant in ABA/1340/2023. Mr. S.V. Gavand, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM: SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED : 4th MAY, 2023. P. C. :- Not on board. Upon being mentioned, taken on board. This is an application for intervention fled by the First Informant. Considering the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Learned counsel for the Applicant in Anticipatory Bail Application to implead the Intervenor as party Respondent and furnish copy of the anticipatory bail application to the learned counsel for the Intervenor on or before the next date of hearing. The application stands disposed of. (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)