All Writ Appeal

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1538 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9282 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr. P. N. Shekhar for the Applicant. Mr. Ajay A. Joshi for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : JUNE 25, 2014 P.C.: Mentioned. Not on board. At the request of learned counsel for the Applicant, the matter is taken on board. The learned counsel for the Respondent seeks some time to file AffidavitinReply. At his request, S.O. to 4th July 2014. JUDGE

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1538 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9282 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders None for the applicant Mr.S.P.Rajepandhare i/b Mr.A.A.Joshi for the respondent nos.1 to 3 CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. DATED : 04/07/2014 PC : 1 None for the applicant. 2 .Advocate for respondent nos.1 to 3 states that they have already filed an AffidavitinReply in the Registry. Same is not on record. Hence, Registry is directed to find out the same and place the same on record. 3 Stand over to 11.07.2014. (K.K.TATED, J.)

Order - Status 11: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1538 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9282 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders None for the Applicant. Mr. Ajay A. Joshi for the Respondent. CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : JULY 18, 2014 P.C.: None appeared for the Applicant when the matter was called out. Office note shows that on 4 th July 2014 also none appeared on behalf of the Applicant. Hence, dismissed for default. JUDGE

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 209 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7591 OF 2010 Harsha Rohan Shirdhankar .. Applicant Vs. Rohan Kesarinath Shirdhankar .. Respondent Mr. Anand S. Kulkarni for the Applicant. None for the Respondent. CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. Date : 8th February, 2011. P.C. The Petition of the husband has been dismissed. The amount of maintenance deposited by the husband in this Court shall be allowed to be withdrawn by the wife. The cheque to be drawn by the Registrar of this Court shall be in the name of Ms. Harsha Ganesh Koparde. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. ( ROSHAN DALVI, J.) Amk

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2295 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5763 OF 2004 Janabai w/o R.J.Bhandari & Ors. ...Applicants V/s. Dr.Ramesh Dattatreya Pandit & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Jose George for Applicants. Mr.D'Souza for Respondent No.4. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JANUARY 27, 2009. P.C. Office objection be removed within two weeks from today, failing which, Application to stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court. If steps are taken in time, Application be listed on 11th February 2009. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2295 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5763 OF 2004 Janabai w/o.R.J.Bhandari & Ors. ..Applicants. V/s. Dr.Ramesh Dattatreya Pandit & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Jose George for applicants. Mr.D'Souza for Respondent No.4. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : FEBRUARY 11, 2009. P.C. : Counsel for the parties fairly submits that this application will have to proceed before Justice Mhase having regard to the nature of relief claimed. Accordingly, Office is directed to place the application before Justice Mhase subject to convenience of His Lordship. Liberty to apply. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)

Order - Status 11: HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No. 2295 of 2006 IN Writ Petition No. 5763 of 2004 Janabai w/o R. J. Bhandari & Ors. Applicants. Versus Dr. Ramesh D. Pandit & Others. Respondents. Mr. Jose George for the Applicants. Mr. D'souza a/w Mr. A. S. Rai for the Respondent no.4. Coram : S. B. Mhase, JJ. Date : August 27, 2009. P. C. : Heard. This civil application is moved for removing the observations made by this Court in the order dated 27th April 2006. They want to delete following sentence from the said order : "Thus, this Court finds that so far as the identification of the property of S. C. Suit No. 4374 of 1978 is concerned there is no dispute between the parties." What is important to be noted is that the property was in possession of the Receiver. The Receiver identified the property of the plaintiff and prepared the measurement plan. As per the said plan the Receiver has placed the plaintiff in possession of the property and that was admitted by the original plaintiff before this Court. The defendants were also party in that proceeding before this Court. At that time they have not objected to the said plan. Therefore, on admitted facts the property has been identified by the Receiver and possession has been handed over to the plaintiff. It is also important to note that though the present civil application is filed in the year 2006, till date it was not pressed and circulated at any point of time. Probably, with a view that by the time matter comes before the Court, the Court will forget everything what had happened in 2006. However, fortunately everything has been correctly recorded by the Court and on that basis the order has been passed. There is no substance in the application and the same is hereby rejected. (S.B.MHASE, J.)

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2092 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9059 OF 2005 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court's or Judge's orders. coram, appearances, Court's orders : or directions and Registrar's : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Ms Bhalekar,i/b Mr U.P.Warunjikar, for the respondent. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATED: 24.08.2006 P.C. : The applicant has prayed for fixed date of hearing of the main writ petition. The writ petition has yet not admitted. It is open for the applicant to seek circulation for admission of the writ petition. The prayer made in the civil application cannot be granted. It is disposed of as such. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1992 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2006 OF 2010 Santosh S. Jadhav ...Petitioner v/s The State of Maharashtra and ors. ...Respondents Mr D.V. Sutar for Petitioner. Mr C.R. Sonawane, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr A.A. Garge for Respondent No.3. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND N.D. DESHPANDE JJ. DATE : 19TH OCTOBER 2010. 2 WP2006/10 P.C. :- 1] Hearing of the petition is already expedited. No fixed date of hearing can be given. Civil application is disposed off. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary of this Court. Certified copy expedited. ( JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH ) ( JUSTICE N.D. DESHPANDE )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH CIVIL COURT OF APPELLATE JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLI APPLICATION NO. 1910 OF 2006 IN 10.00 0.5 2005 WI WRIT PETITION NO. 4960 OF 2005 Shri Rajendra Shrikant Parulekar ılekar Ap Applicant Vs. The Hon. Chairman nairman Re Respondent Mr. K.K. Malpathak ak for applicant. Mr. Ganesh K. Sovani for respondent. CORAM: M: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. Date : August 2, 2006. P.C.: . The application is misconceived and the same is rejected with liberty to the applicant to take appropriate steps on the criminal side. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1830 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 125 OF 2009 Tanvi Dinesh Patel ... Applicant Vs State of Maharashtra & 2 ors. ... Respondents Mr. R.K. Mendadkar for the applicant. Mr. V.P. Malwankar, AGP, for the respondents No.1 to 3. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 24TH JULY, 2009. P.C.: Civil Application is allowed to the extent of prayer clause (a) which reads thus: "(a) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the applicant to amend the Writ Petition No.125 of 2009 as indicated in the Schedule annexed to this Application." Since Rule has already been granted and the matter is required to be considered on merits, prayer clause (b) cannot be considered at this stage as a composite application cannot be entertained. The applicant is at liberty to file a separate application with regard to prayer clause (b) if he so desires. Civil Application, accordingly, stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (R.M. SAVANT) (S.B. MHASE, J.)