All Writ Petition (Civil)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 17121 OF 2016 Mr. Deepak Sopanrao Salunkhe And Ors ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Addl. Chief Secretary And Ors ....Respondent MADHAV JAYAJIRAI JAMDAR GOVERNMENT PLEADER WRIT CELLR.NO. 1 CORAM : RANJIT MORE. & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ DATE : 8th August, 2016 P.C. : Mentioned. At the request of learned advocate for the petitioners Stand over to 16/08/2016. Ad-interim relief if any granted earlier to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL AND CRIMINAL APPELATE JURISDICTION AND ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM : S.S. KEMKAR & M. S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 16 / 08 /2016 P.C.: The following matters on balance Board/Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. The matters will appear on the dates as may be fixed as per C.M.I.S. Civil Appellate Side C.M.I.S. Date Origi nal Side C.M.I.S Date 95, 145 14/10/16 101 06/04/17 96, 103 150, 151, 152,153,154,155,156,157,158, 159,160,161,162 27/10/16 102 07/04/17 146, 149 20/12/16 89, 90, 91, 92, 97, 98,99,100,104,105,106,107, 108, 109,110, 111, 112, 113,115,116, 117,118,119,120,121,122,123, 124,125,126,127,128,129,130, 131,132,133,134,135 02/03/17 136,137,138,139,140, 143,144,147,148 03/03/17 If in any of the above matters, ad interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If adinterim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. (M.S. KARNIK, J.) (S.S. KEMKAR, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10327 OF 2016 Mr. Deepak Sopanrao Salunkhe And Ors ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Addl. Chief Secretary And Ors ....Respondent Madhav Jayajirai Jamdar For Petitioner Ms. R.M. Shinde, AGP for State. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M. S. KARNIK, JJ DATE : 26th October, 2016 P.C. : No order, as per CMIS date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10327 OF 2016 Mr. Deepak Sopanrao Salunkhe And Ors ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Addl. Chief Secretary And Ors ....Respondent Madhav Jayajirai Jamdar For Petitioner Ms. NIsha Mehra,Assst. Government Pleader Writ Cell R.no. 1 For Respondent CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ DATE : 28th November, 2016 P.C. : Stand over to 18/01/2017 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10327 OF 2016 Deepak Sopanrao Salunkhe & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents …... Mr. Madhav J. Jamdar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Ms. R. M. Shinde, AGP for Respondent No.1 – State. Mr. Nitin P. Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 18, 2017. …... P.C. : Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on the question of admission. 2 Issue notice to the respondents. 3 Learned AGP waives service of notice on behalf of respondent no.1. 4 Learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2 waives service of notice on his behalf. 5 Steps for service of notice on respondent no.3 be taken within two weeks. rpa 2/2 wp-10327-16.doc 6 Reply of the petition be filed within four weeks from today. 7 List the petition as per C.M.I.S. date. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10327 OF 2016 Deepak Sopanrao Salunkhe and Others Petitioners vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others Respondents Mr. M.J. Jamdar, for the Petitioners Ms. Chaitali Kale i/b. Mr. N.P. Deshpande, for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Mr. V.N. Sagare, AGP for Respondent No. 1. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE : APRIL 03, 2017 P.C.: . The learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 undertakes to file reply during the course of the day. The rejoinder if any, may be filed by the Petitioners within four weeks. List the matter as per CMIS date. (B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)

Order - Status 17: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10327 OF 2016 Mr. Deepak Sopanrao Salunkhe And Ors ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Addl. Chief Secretary And Ors ....Respondent CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & G. S. KULKARNI, JJ DATE : 7th December, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned for CMIS date. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to CMIS date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10327 OF 2016 Mr. Deepak Sopanrao Salunkhe And Ors ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Addl. Chief Secretary And Ors ....Respondent CORAM : R.M. BORDE & RAJESH G. KETKAR, JJ DATE : 7th February, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is curtailed from daily board and adjourned as per CMIS date. In the meantime,Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 21: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10327 OF 2016 Mr. Deepak Sopanrao Salunkhe And Ors ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Addl. Chief Secretary And Ors ....Respondent Mr.Madhav Jayajirai Jamdar For Petitioner Mr. C.P. Yadav, AGP for State/Respondent no. 1. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M. S. KARNIK, JJ DATE : 18th April, 2018 P.C. : None for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Stand Over to 20/06/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 23: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10327 OF 2016 Mr. Deepak Sopanrao Salunkhe & Ors. … Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents Mr. Madhav J. Jamdar for Petitioners. Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for Respondent No.1 – State. CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR AND NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ. DATE : JULY 13, 2018 . Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioners on the question of admission. RULE. No fresh notice after admission is necessary, as Respondents are already represented. (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)

Order - Status 4: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 6: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 8: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 4: TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI Digitally signed by TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI Date: 2023.02.06 17:26:15 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni …Petitioner V/s. Gauri Sagar Kukarni And Ors …Respondents Mr. Siddharth R. Karpe a/w Mr. Dipak Y. Jadhav for Petitioner. Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for Respondent No.3 (State). CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 03, 2023 P.C.: The petitioner challenges order of grant of maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. According to the petitioner as of today, arrears of Rs.10,00,000/- are due. He states that the petitioner is ready to deposit amount of Rs.5,00,000/- before the learned Magistrate within one (1) week from today and remaining amount of Rs.5,00,000/- within two (2) weeks thereafter. The statement on behalf of the petitioner is accepted as undertaking. In view of the said statement, the arrest warrant issued against the petitioner shall not be executed. It is made clear that in case of failure of petitioner to deposit Rs.5,00,000/- before the learned Magistrate within one (1) week from today or remaining Rs.5,00,000/- within two (2) weeks thereafter, ad-interim relief granted earlier shall stand vacated without further reference to the court. Stand over to 24th February 2023. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni …Petitioner V/s. Gauri Sagar Kulkarni And Ors …Respondents Mr. Siddharth R. Karpe a/w Mr. Dipak Y. Jadhav for Petitioner. Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for Respondent No.3 (State). CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 03, 2023 P.C.: The petitioner challenges order of grant of maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. According to the petitioner as of today, arrears of Rs.10,00,000/- are due. He states that the petitioner is ready to deposit amount of Rs.5,00,000/- before learned Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai within one (1) week from today and remaining amount of Rs.5,00,000/- within two (2) weeks thereafter. The statement on behalf of the petitioner is accepted as undertaking. In view of the said statement, the arrest warrant issued against the petitioner shall not be executed. It is made clear that in case of failure of petitioner to deposit Rs.5,00,000/- before the learned Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai within one (1) week from today or remaining Rs.5,00,000/- within two (2) weeks thereafter, ad-interim relief granted earlier shall stand vacated without further reference to the court. Stand over to 24 th February 2023. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) (The order is modified as per order dated 7th January, 2023. The corrections in the paragraph 1 and 3 are inserted and corrected which shows in italicize)

Order - Status 6: Ghuge IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni … Petitioner V/s. Gauri Sagar Kulkarni And Ors … Respondents Mr. Siddharth Karpe for the petitioner. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 7, 2023 P.C.: Not on board. Taken on board for speaking to the minutes. In the cause title the instead of word "Kukarni" be substituted by "Kulkarni". In paragraph 1 instead of words "Section 125 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908" be substituted by "Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973". In paragraph 1 and 3 instead of words "before the learned Magistrate" be substituted by "learned Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai". Order be corrected and uploaded as order no.2 in this matter. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni ....PETITIONER V/S Gauri Sagar Kukarni And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 24th February, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 31/03/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni ....PETITIONER V/S Gauri Sagar Kukarni And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN J DATE : 31st March, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 06/06/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: Shailaja IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4959 OF 2022 ….. …. Sagar Suhar Kulkarni ] Petitioner Vs. Gauri Sagar Kulkarni and others ] Respondents. Mr. Siddharth Karpe, for Petitioner. Mr. N.B. Patil, A.P.P, for Respondent No.3-State. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATE : 6th JUNE, 2023. P.C. The petitioner has complied with the directions issued by this Court vide an order dated 3rd February, 2023 by depositing an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- in two installments i.e first installment on 10th February, 2023 and second installment on 23rd February, 2023 in the Family Court at Bandra. Since there is due compliance of the directions issued by this Court, there shall be no coercive action against the petitioner. Issue notice to the respondent returnable on 4th July, 2023. In addition to the Court's notice, the petitioner shall serve the respondents with private notice and file an affidavit of service. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]

Order - Status 9: ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4950 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms.Pallavi Dabholkar i/by Mr. S.Y.Katkade for the Petitioners. Mr. K. Narayanan i/by M/s. Narayanan & Narayanan for Respondent Nos. 1 & 3 to 6. CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED : 10th November, 2008. P.C. . The learned counsel appearing for Respondent in Writ Petition No.4905 of 2008 stating certain development needs to be taken on record by an affidavit and the same be filed within a period of one week. Adjourned to 17/11/2008. [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4950 OF 2008 P.R.Enterprises, Mumbai .. Petitioners V/s. Kalyanji K.Gada (Since deceased through his LR's) Mrs.Maniben K.Gada & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.S.Y.Katkade for the Petitioners. Mr.K.Narayanan i/b.Narayanan & Narayanan for Respondent Nos.1, 3 to 6. CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATE : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2008. P.C. . Admit. Rule, returnable on 9th February, 2008. No coercive steps pursuant to the impugned order. The learned counsel for the Respondent waives service. (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.)

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2509 OF 2014 Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. P. M. Palshikar for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. CORAM : N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 07 APRIL, 2014 P.C.: The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Labour Court, Mumbai has not considered the stand of the Petitioner that 5 th Pay Commission, upon which the reliance was sought by the Respondent, was made applicable only after execution of the agreement dated 25 June 2004 and the Respondent had obtained voluntary retirement scheme on 31 May 2004 and therefore, it was not applicable to him. Issue notice to the Respondent, returnable on 5 May 2014. Till further orders, the Respondent will not take coercive steps based on the impugned order. (N.M. JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 29: Sequeira IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2509 of 2014 The Maharashtra State Cooperative Marketing Federation. .. Petitioner Vs. Shri Balkrishna Ganpati Salunkhe. .. Respondent Mr.P.M.Palshikar, for the Petitioner. Mr.Vaibhav Gaikwad, for the Respondent. CORAM: N.M.Jamdar, J. Monday 23 November, 2015 P.C. : Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The Petitioner Federation challenges the order dated 3 August 2013 passed by Labour Court, Mumbai allowing application filed by the Respondentmember under Section 33 (c)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Labour Court has accepted the claim of the Respondent No.1 for entitlement of difference and wages for the period from 1 June 2003 to 31 May 2004 after applicability of recommendation from 5th Pay Commission and certain other findings. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that some employees of the Federation who were not in the category of workmen had filed Writ petition No.4274 of 2009 and 4267 of 2009 with the Aurangabad bench of this Court and the Division bench had granted identical relief which is granted by the Labour Court in the present case. The learned counsel submitted that the Federation has challenged the decision of the Division bench by way of Civil Appeal Nos.4521 and 4522 of 2013 and the Apex Court has admitted and granted leave and unconditionally stayed the operation of the orders. Copies of the orders are placed on record. In view of this position, Rule. Respondent waives service. The interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b). Liberty to apply after the decision of the Apex Court is rendered. (N.M.Jamdar, J.)

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 3: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 5: ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Mr. A. H. H. Ponda a/w Swapnil Ambure i/b Dinesh Tiwari for Petitioner Mrs. A. A. Mane AGP for the State. CORAM : R. K. DESHPANDE AND V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ. (VACATION COURT) DATED : st JUNE, 2015. 1 P.C. : Issue notice to respondent no. 1 for final disposal of disposal of the matter. Notice returnable on 16/06/2015 16/06/2015. Learned APP waives service of notice for respondent no. 2. 2) There shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clause 'b' till then. (V.L. ACHLIYA, J.) (R. K. DESHPANDE, J.)