All Writ Petition (Civil)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1/1 WRIT PETITION NO. 6874 OF 2022 Sagar Dnyaneshwar Naik … Petitioner Vs The State Election Commission of Maharashtra thr. State Election Commission & Ors. … Respondents Mr Ranjit Thorat, Sr. Advocate a/w. Adv. Siddharth Dharmadhikari i/b. Adv. Vishal Acharya for the Petitioner. Y. D. Patil, AGP for the Respondent-State Adv. Irfan A. Shaikh i/b. Adv. S. B. Shetye for the Respondent No. 1 Mr. Sandeep Marne for the Respondent Adv. Saurabh a/w. Adv. Harshad Sathe for the intervernor CORAM : A. A. SAYED & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ DATED : 16th JUNE 2022 P.C.: Leave to amend the Petition. Amendment to be carried out within two working days. Amended copy of the Petition be served upon the Respondents. Stand over to 27th June, 2022. ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Digitally signed by ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Date: 2022.06.16 20:55:20 +0530 (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (A. A. SAYED, J.)

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6874 OF 2022 Sagar Dnyaneshwar Naik ….Petitioner Versus The State Election Commission and Ors. ….Respondents Mr. Raj Adhia i/b. Mr. Vishal Valmik Acharya, Advocate for the Petitioner. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 14th JULY, 2022. P.C. : Not on board. Mentioned by way of praecipe and, therefore, the order is passed on the praecipe itself. To be heard along with writ petition No.8275 of 2022. Stand over to 21st July, 2022. To be placed high on board. (SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8275 OF 2022 Sharad Shivaji Jamdar ….Petitioner Versus Divisional Commissioner Pune and anr ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6877 OF 2022 Naresh Ganpat Mahske ….Petitioner Versus The State Election Commission of Maharashtra through Election Commissioner and Ors. ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6874 OF 2022 Sagar Dnyaneshwar Naik ….Petitioner Versus The State Election Commission of Maharashtra through Election Commissioner and Ors. ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7266 OF 2022 Sharad Anandrao Patil ….Petitioner Versus Ld.District Collector of Kolhapur and Ors. ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8418 OF 2022 SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN Digitally signed by SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN Date: 2022.07.22 12:29:03 +0530 5 wp 8275-22.doc Gaurav Ulhas Bhagat and Anr. ….Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8087 OF 2022 Rahul Ramchandra Pasale and anr ….Petitioners Versus The State Election Commission and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8155 OF 2022 Prakash Rahul Ramchandra Pasale and Ors. ….Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra thr. Secre. Rural Development Dept. and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8156 OF 2022 Mahaveer Anna Patil and ors ….Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra thr. Secre. Rural Development Dept. and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8159 OF 2022 Arunrao Jaysingrao Ingawale and ors ….Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra thr. Secre. Rural Development Dept. and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8132 OF 2022 5 wp 8275-22.doc Nitin Jaysingrao Kharade and ors ….Petitioners Versus State Election Commission, Maharashtra and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8045 OF 2022 Sanjay Namdev Khot ….Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra thr. Secre. Rural Development Dept. and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8247 OF 2022 Shri Hanmant Dharamraj Kolawale ….Petitioner Versus State Election Commission, Maharashtra and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8249 OF 2022 Shri Pundalik Ravaji Patil ….Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra thr. Secre. Rural Development Dept. and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8270 OF 2022 Sanjeev Nanik Khailare ….Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.16769 OF 2022 Amar @ Hambirrao Dinkar Patil ….Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra thr. Secre. Rural Development Dept. and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8344 OF 2022 Shri. Amarsinh Gopalrao Ghorpade Versus ….Petitioner Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8396 OF 2022 Kantilal Ramrao Narsale And Ors Petitioners Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Ors Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8558 OF 2022 Mr. Shrimant Shamrao Jadhav Petitioner Versus The State Election Commission Of Maharashtra Thru State Election Commissioner And Ors. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.16839 OF 2022 Shri Ravindra Bandu Patil and anr. ….Petitioners Versus The State Election Commission, Maharashtra and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8557 OF 2022 Mohan Ramchandra Chaudhary ...Petitioner Versus The District Collector, Pune And Ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8101 OF 2022 Chandradip Shashikant Marke ….Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra thr. Secre. Rural Development Dept. and ors ….Respondents Sr. Adv. Anil V. Anturkar a/w Mr. Amol Gatne for petitioner in WP No. 8275/2022 Mr. Shekhar Jagtap a/w Mr. Ranjeet Nimbalkar i.b. Mr. Mayuresh Ingale for applicant in IA St No. 17101/2022. Mr. Pradeep J. Thorat a/w MR. Chirag Shah and Mr. Raj Adhia i.b. Mr. Shyam Jadhav for petitioner in WP No. 6877/2022 Sr. Adv . R. S. Apte i.b. Mr. N. R. Bubna for R. No. 2 and 3 in WP No. 6877/2022 Sr. Adv. Ranjit Thorat i.b. Mr. Vishal Acharya for petitioner in W.P. No. 6874/2022 Ms. Lucy Massey for applicant in IA 16679/2022 in WP No. 6874/2022 Mr. Manoj Patil for petitioner in W. P. No. 7266/2022 Mr. Surel Shah i.b. Mr. Vishwajeet V. Mohite for petitioner in WP No. 8418/2022 Mr. Abhijeet Kulkarni for petitioner in WP No. 8087/2022 and i.b. DD and Abhijit Associates for petitioner in W. P. No. 8132/2022 Mr. Vaibhav V. Ugale for applicant in IASt. No. 17092/2022 in W.P. No. 8087/2022 Mr. Sandeep S. Koregave for petitioner in WP No. 8159/2022, W.P.No. 8155/2022 Mr. Surel S. Shah i.b. Mr. Sandeep S. Koregave for petitioner in WP No. 8101/2022 , WP No. 8249/2022, WP St No. 16769/2022 Mr. Surel Shah a/w Mr. Swaroop Karade i.b. Mr. Pravin P. Mengane for petitioner in WP No. 8156/2022 Mr. Tejas Hilange for petitioner in W. P. No. 8045/2022 Mr. Samadhan A. Kashid for petitioner in W.P. No. 8247/2022 Mr. Anvil Kalekar for petitioner in W.P. No. 8270/2022 Mr. Vierendra V. Pethe for petitioner in W.P. No. 8344/2022 Mr. Manisha Devkar a/w Mr. S. M. Katkar for petitioner in W. P. No. 8396/2022 Ms. Ekta Tripathi for petitioner in W. P. No. 8558/2022 Mr. Shailesh Chavan for applicant in IA St No. 17779/2022, IA St No. 17776/2022, IA St No. 17777/2022, IA St No. 17778/2022 in WP No. 8558/2022. Mr. Prashant Bhavake for petitioner in W. P.St. No. 16839/2022 Mr. Amjith M. Anandhan a/w Mr. Sachin R. Pawar a/w Mr. Rohan D. Kaiche, Mr. Nikhil P. Mallelwar i.b. Mr. Harshad V. Bhadbhade for petitioner in W. P. 8557/2022. Mr. A. A. Kumbhakoni A. G. a/w Mr. P. P. Kakade, G.P. a/w Mr. A. I. Patel Addl.G.P., Ms. R. M. Shinde AGP (in W.P. No. 8558/2022) a/w Ms. M. S. Bane, AGP (In W.P. No. 8275/2022) a/w Mr. V. S. Gokhale B. Panel Counsel AGP a/w Ms. Sneha Bhange for state – Respondent Mr. Vishwanath Patil a/w Mr. Anikit Lodhe a/w Mr. Kewal Ahya for R. No. 5 in WP No. 5087/2022 and WP No. 8132/2022. ( Solapur Zilla Parishad) Mr. Sachindra B. Shetye a/w Mr. Irfan Shaikh, Ms. Priyanka H. Chavan and Ms. Sarika Shetye for the State Election Commission CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & KISHORE C. SANT, JJ. DATE : 21 JULY 2022 P.C. WP No. 6877/2022 and WP No. 6874/2022 be detagged from the said group and place before an appropriate Bench. Stand over to 25/07/2022. (KISHORE C. SANT, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3608 OF 2021 Shouakat A.Wahab Isane & Ors. ] Petitioners. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ] through Principal Secretary, ] Department of Revenue & Forest ] & Ors. ] Respondents. … Gayatri Singh, Senior Counsel a/w Sangram Chinnappa i/b Kartikeya Bahadur for petitioner. Mr.S.S. Panchpor, AGP for State. Ms Sharmila Deshmukh, for respondent no.5 Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority. … CORAM : K.K. TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 3rd AUGUST, 2021. P.C. Heard learned Counsel for parties. Learned Senior Counsel Ms Gayatri Singh appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in the present proceeding, as per letter dated 24th December 2004 (Exhibit 'O' page 65) the Revenue and Forest Department directed the Collector, Raigad that excavation of sand in the 11 kilometers area from Vicharewadi to Dasgaon in Savitri river bed, Raigad should be by manual i.e. 'Hathpati'. She submits that inspite of that, the respondent issued E-tender dated 30th September 2021 for mechanized drilling of sand. In support of her contention, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner relies on Annexure to E-tender on page no.227 particularly, Gat No.53 to 57. Whether Gat no.53 to 57 comes within the area of 11 kilometer as per letter dated 24th December 2004 from Revenue and Forest department to Collector Raigad or not, for that purpose the petitioner is granted liberty to file affidavit in support of petition. Learned AGP Mr.Panchpor for respondent also seeks some time to file their affidavit in reply. In view of this, following order is passed. a) Liberty is granted to the petitioner to file additional affidavit in support of petition on or before 7th August 2021 with copy to other side. b) Respondent/State to file their affidavit in reply on or before 9/8/2021. c) Matter to appear on board on 11th August 2021. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] [K. K. TATED, J.]

Order - Status 7: 10.3608.21-wp+.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3608/2021 Shoukat A. Wahab Isane & Ors. ….. Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….. Respondents WRIT PETITION NO.2946/2021 Abdul Samad Almiya Mandlekar ….. Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….. Respondents Mr. Kartikeya Bahadur for the Petitioner in 3608/2021 Mr. Sangam Chinappa for the Petitioner in 2946/2021 Mr. S. S. Panchpor, AGP for the State Mr. Kaushal Parsekar a/w. Saloni Vyas I/b. Legasis Partners for Respondent No.4 Ms. Jaya Bagwe I/b. Sharmila Deshmukh for Respondent No.5 MCZMA – in both matters Mr. Kumar Abhishek Singh a/w. Nishant Bhatia I/b. Anomal Law Group LLP for Respondent No.6 – in both matters CORAM: K.K.TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 31, 2021 P.C. 1 Heard. The learned AGP for the State seeks permission to file an additional compilation of documents in the Registry, with copy to other side. 2 Hence, the following order is passed: a. The learned AGP to file an additional compilation of documents in the Registry, on or before 07.09.2021, with copy to other side. b. The matter to appear on board on 20.09.2021. (PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.)

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2021 Shouakat A. Wahab Isane And Ors ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary Dept. Of Revenue And Forest And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 OF 2021 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ DATE : 27th September, 2021 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 11/10/2021. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: Priya Soparkar 1 12 wp 3608-21 with wp 2946-21-c PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Digitally signed by PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Date: 2021.10.12 11:05:37 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3608 OF 2021 Shouakat A. Wahab Isane and ors. … Petitioners V/s. State of Maharashtra and ors. … Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.2946 OF 2021 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra and ors. … Respondents Mr.Kartikeya Bahadur, Advocate for the Petitioners in WP No.3608 of 2021. Ms.Gayatri Singh i/by Mr.Sangram Chinnappa, Advocates for the Petitioner in WP No.2946 of 2021. Ms.Neha Bhide, "B" Panel counsel for the Sate. Mr.Kaushal Parsekar i/by M/s Legasis Partners, Advocate for Respondent No.4. Ms.Sharmila Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent No.5-MCZMA in both matters. Mr.Kumar Abhishek Singh alongwith Mr.Shubham Agrahari and Mr. Nishant Bhatia i/by M/s Anoma Law Group LLP, Advocates for Respondent No.6. CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 11, 2021. P.C.:- It appears that the contract period of the petitioner has expired on 30th September, 2021. Ms.Bhide, learned AGP to inform us on the next date as to whether there is any proposal for extension of the contract period. All the affidavits be filed in the registry before the next date. Stand over to 21st October, 2021. (MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) (UJJAL BHUYAN, J.) ….

Order - Status 15: Digitally signed HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV SHIV by HEMANT CHANDERSEN Date: 2022.03.17 17:22:16 $+0530$ Shiv IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2564 OF 2022 Dilip Babaji Ulkirde Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors ...Petitioner $...$ Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION STAMP NO.6528 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2564 OF 2022 Shaurya Enterprises Versus Dilip Babaji Ulkirde & Ors ...Petitioner ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2946 OF 2021 ... Petitioner Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3608 OF 2021 Shouakat A Wahab Isane & Ors ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors $...$ Respondents Page 1 of 5 17th March 2022 Mrs Gayatrisingh *, Senior Advocate with Mr Sangram Chinnappa for the Petitioner in WP 2564/2022 & WP 3608/2021.* Mr Mihir Desai *, Senior Advocate i/b Kartieya Bahadur for the Petitioner in WP 2946/2021.* Mr K S Thorat *, AGP for the State/Respondent.* Ms Jaya Bagwe *, i/b Sharmila Deshmukh for the MCGM/Respondent No 5 in WP 3608/2021 and WP 2946/2021, WP 2564/2022, IAL 6528/2022.* Mr Prashant Pratap *, Senior Advocate with Kumar Abhishek Singh, Shubham A and Nishant Bhatia i/b Anoma Law Group LLP for Respondent No 6.* Mr Mayur Khandeparkar *, i/b Vaibhav Jagtap, for the Applicant in IAST 6528/2022.* CORAM G.S. Patel & Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ. DATED: 17th March 2022 PC:- 1. We will require from the State of Maharashtra the entire original file by 12.30 pm today relating to all sand mining and sand dredging activities permitted or proposed on the 11 km stretch that is subject matter of Appellate Side Writ Petition No 2564 of 2022, Writ Petition No 3608 of 2021 and Writ Petition No 2946 of 2021. 2. We require this because in Writ Petition No 3608 of 2021 and Writ Petition No 2946 of 2021, both of which are pending, on 11th October 2021 this Court was informed that the contract period regarding the sand mining or dredging had ended on 30th September 2021. The Government was to inform the Court whether there was any proposal for extending the contract period. 3. There was no such communication from the Government at any time. In other words, the Court was never informed of any extension. Instead, it seems that for one contractor represented by Mr Pratap today, an extension of a 2021 contract was granted on 16th February 2022 and sent through the various channels until it finally reached that contractor, who is engaged in mechanised sand dredging at a site on this very stretch along the Savitri river, on 8th March 2022. 4. 8th March 2022 is also the date on which, after hearing Ms Singh and Mr Thorat, we made an ad-interim order in Civil Writ Petition No 2564 of 2022 staying an auction notice for award of mechanised dredging contracts in various gats notified for this very 11 km stretch of the Savitri river. Mr Pratap submits that his clients' contract, though within this 11 km stretch, is not covered by the auction notice that is the subject matter of Writ Petition No 2564 of 2022. 5. Even if that be so, we do not see how the Government could have communicated and put into operation any extension or proposal for extension of Mr Pratap's client's contract since that information had not been communicated to the High Court in the two active Writ Petition Nos 3608 of 2021 and 2946 of 2021. 6. Mr Desai appears for the Petitioner in Writ Petition No 2946 of 2021. Ms Gayatri Singh appears for the Petitioner Writ Petition No 3608 of 2021. (There was an error in noting the appearances on that date). 7. Respondent No 6 before the Division Bench on 11th October 2021 was precisely Mr Pratap's client today. There is no possibility at all of either Mr Pratap's client or of the Government being unaware of the order that was passed on 11th October 2021, or that the Court desired to be informed not only about an extension of the contract but even about any proposal for an extension of the contract period. What the order records (there appears to be another typographical error) is that it was the contract period of Respondent No 6, Mr Pratap's client today, which had expired on 30th September 2021. It is that expired contract that is now sought to be extended. In our view, this is impermissible and could not have been done without informing this Court having regard to these circumstances. 8. For today we will require the original file from the Government relating to the award of all contracts around this stretch of the Savitri river. 9. The previous interim order passed in Writ Petition 2564 of 2022 are extended until next date. We make it clear that for this 11 km stretch of Savitri river no award in any form of sand mining or dredging whether mechanised or by hard is to be awarded until the next date. 10. All Affidavits to be filed by Tuesday 22nd March 2022. 11. Mr Pratap will be entitled to file an Affidavit in Reply to the 2022 Petition. In Writ Petition 2946 of 2021, leave to amend to bring subsequent events on record without need of re-verification. Amendment to be carried out by Tuesday 22nd March 2022. 12. List the Petitions on supplementary board on 25th March 2022, high on board. (Madhav J. Jamdar, J) (G. S. Patel, J)

Order - Status 17: Arun IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 Dilip B Ulkirde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue And Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 6528 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 Dilip B Ulkirde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue And Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 OF 2021 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal …Respondents Secretary & Ors WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2021 Shquakat A Wahab Isane & Ors …Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue & Forest & Ors …Respondents Mr Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate *, i/b Kartikeya Bahadur, for the Petitioner in WP/2946/2021.* Mr AM Kulkarni *, 'A' Panel Counsel with Mr KS Thorat, AGP, for the State* Ms Jaya Bagwe *, with Anchita Nair and Gayatri Deshmukh, i/b Sharmila Deshmukh, for Respondent No5 (MCZMA).* Mr Prashant Pratap, Senior Advocate *, Kumar Abhishek Singh, Shubham A & Nishant Bhatia, i/b Anoma Law Group LLP, for Respondent No. 6 in WP/2564/2022, WP/2946/2021 and WP/3608/2021.* Mr Mayur Khandeparkar *, with Vaibhav Jagtap, for the Applicant in IAST/6528/2022.* Mr Amol Yadav *, Addl Collector, Raigad, present.* CORAM G.S. Patel & Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ. DATED: 25th March 2022 PC:- 1. Mr Kulkarni tenders an additional file. Ms Gayatri Singh, Senior Advocate *, with Sangram Chinnappa, for the Petitioner in WP/2564/2022 & WP/3608/2021.* 2. Mr Kulkarni requests time till 1st April 2022. He states on oral instructions received in Court that the extension order in favour of the 6th Respondent to Writ Petition No. 3608 of 2021 and also in Writ Petition No. 2946 of 2021 will be recalled by an administrative order taken at the level of the ministry. We have today in open Court outlined the reasons why we believe this is necessary and have made specific reference to an earlier order of 11th October 2021. We are clear that the order needs to be recalled. It is for this reason that we grant Mr Kulkarni time until 1st April 2022. 3. We return the entire file to Mr Kulkarni including the volume that was tendered across the bar today. 4. We also allow the 6th Respondent, Aditya Enterprises and the State Government to file a formal application for extension of the 6th Respondent's license for our consideration. 5. Copies will be served on the Advocates for the Petitioners in all matters. 6. List all the matters for orders on the supplementary board of 1st April 2022. 7. The previous order will continue until Friday, 1st April 2022. (Madhav J. Jamdar, J) (G. S. Patel, J) Page 3 of 3 25th March 2022

Order - Status 20: Shephali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 Dilip Babaji Ulkirde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 6528 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Digitally signed by SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2022.04.07 09:52:11 +0530 Dilip Babaji Ulkirde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 8142 OF 2022 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary & Ors …Respondents Page 1 of 3 6th April 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 8144 OF 2022 Shouakat A Wahab Isane & Ors …Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary Department of Revenue and Forest & Ors …Respondents Ms Gayatri Singh, Senior Advocate *, with Sangram Chinnappa, for the Petitioner in WP/2564/2022 & WP/3608/2021.* Mr Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate *, i/b Kartikeya Bahadur, for the Petitioner in WP/2946/2021.* Mr AM Kulkarni, 'A' Panel Counsel *, with KS Thorat, AGP, for the State in WP/2564/2022 & WP/2946/2021.* Mr RP Kadam, AGP *, for Respondent-State, in WP/3608/2021.* Ms Jaya Bagwe *, i/b Sharmila Deshmukh, for Respondent No.5 (MCZMA) in WP/3608/2021 and WP/2946/2021.* Mr Prashant Pratap, Senior Advocate *, with Kumar Abhishek Singh, Shubham Agrahi, Nishaan Shetty & Rohan Mathur, i/b Anoma Law Group LLP, for Respondent No. 6, in WP/2564/2022, WP/2946/2021 & WP/3608/2021 .* Mr Mayur Khandeparkar *, with Vaibhav Jagtap, for the Applicant in IAST/6528/2022.* Mr Chirag Dave *, i/b Legasis Partners, for Respondent No. 4, in WP/2946/2021.* CORAM G.S. Patel & Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ. DATED: 6th April 2022 PC:- Page 2 of 3 6th April 2022 1. We expect an Affidavit explaining (there is no other word for it) from the Maharashtra Maritime Board as to how and for what reason it has recommended mechanised dredging and sand mining on the eleven kilometres stretch of Savitri river that is the subject matter of these Petitions. 2. We are also told that the Collector Raigad said that the policy needed to change and it would be advisable to permit mechanised operations here. We do not pretend to understand what this is supposed to mean. Mr Kulkarni for the State Government will need to file a further Affidavit explaining why these changes in the policy were effected and for what public purpose. We want these Affidavits to be filed in the present two Interim Applications. State Government's Affidavits are to be filed by Monday, 11th April 2022. 3. List all three Petitions and two Interim Applications on Tuesday, 12th April 2022, high on board for orders. (Madhav J. Jamdar, J) (G. S. Patel, J)

Order - Status 23: Ashwini IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 Dilip B Ulkirde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 6528 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 Dilip B Ulkirde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 OF 2021 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary & Ors …Respondents WITH ASHWINI HULGOJI GAJAKOSH Digitally signed by ASHWINI HULGOJI GAJAKOSH Date: 2022.04.13 15:20:27 +0530 INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 8142 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 OF 2021 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary & Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2021 Shouakat A Wahab Isane & Ors …Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra Through The Principal Secretary, Dept of Revenue & Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 8144 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2021 Shouakat A Wahab Isane & Ors …Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra Through The Principal Secretary, Dept of Revenue & Forest & Ors …Respondents Ms Gayatri Singh, Senior Advocate *, i/b Sangram Chinnappa, for the Petitioners in WP/3608/2021 & WP/2564/2021.* Mr Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate *, i/b Kartikeya Bahadur, for the* Petitioner in WP/2946/2021. Page 2 of 5 12th April 2022 Mr AM Kulkarni, 'A' Panel *, with KS Thorat, AGP, for Respondent-State.* Mr Chirag S Dave *, i/b Legasis Partners, for Respondent No. 4, in WP/ 2564/2022.* Ms Jaya Bagwe *, i/b Sharmila Deshmukh, for Respondent No. 5- MCZMA.* Mr Prashant Pratap, Senior Advocate *, with Kumar Abhishek Singh, Shubham Agrahari, Nishaan Shetty & Nishant Bhatia, i/ b Anoma Law Group LLP, for Respondent No. 6.* CORAM G.S. Patel & Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ. DATED: 12th April 2022 PC:- 1. The Writ Petitioners, whom we shall now refere to as the Hatpatti Petitioners, have filed at least three Petitions, two in 2021 and one in 2022 all dealing with the same 11 km stretch of the Savitri river. There are different auctions for sand mining challenged in each. The principle is one: whether there should be an auction for mechanised dredging and sand mining along this or any other stretch of the Savitri river. We refuse to look at this mess of thoroughly disorganised filing. We decline to be asked to look at four-digit page numbers in one matter and then switch to three-digit page numbers in another. The Petitioners must prepare a common consolidated compilation of documents and pleadings (we will not fall into the trap of calling it a 'convenience' compilation, an expression that only does violence to the language) by the next date. A minimal courtesy is to keep papers organized. Page 3 of 5 12th April 2022 2. Interim Application No. 8144 of 2022 is by Aditya Enterprises. It seeks an extension of its license period for permission to continue work at Gat No. 54, Sub-Gat No. HH-2 for another period of 71 days from being given possession. There is an alternative prayer that Aditya Enterprises application or representation be considered by the State Government. 3. Aditya Enterprises' work order of 28th/21st August 2021 has in Clause 52 a condition that dredging will not be done below a depth of 3 mtrs. This has been reiterated in the so-called extension that was granted to Aditya Enterprises from 8th March 2022. 4. Mr Pratap would have it this restriction of 3 mtrs is "a typographical error" because the auction notice/tender mentioned a depth of 5 mtrs. That was the basis on which Aditya Enterprises put it its bid on 21st June 2021. In fact, he says the existing depth is 4.31 mtrs and therefore giving a license to excavate to 3 mtrs is utterly meaningless and even nonsensical. He says, therefore, that the 3 mtrs restrictions in the work order of 20th August 2021 and the extension of 8th March 2022 are clearly mistakes. 5. Mr Kulkarni for the State Government on instructions says that there is no mistake. The 3 mtr depth restriction is one that is mandated by the relevant guidelines and by orders of the Supreme Court. 6. At best, therefore, on Aditya Enterprises ' application we can permit Aditya Enterprises to make a representation to the Page 4 of 5 12th April 2022 Department of Revenue for an appropriate extension and clarification. Mr Kulkarni states that a hearing will be afforded to Aditya Enterprises as also to the legal representatives of the Petitioner before a final order is passed. Mr Pratap says that a representation will be made within one week from today. The officer delegated to decide this representation to do so within two weeks thereafter after giving notice to the Advocates for the Petitioner and affording them a hearing. We grant liberty to the parties to apply. 7. We make it clear that if Aditya Enterprises files any proceeding on an order made by the Revenue Department on Aditya Enterprises' representation, then Aditya Enterprises will join these Petitioners or their Association to that proceeding. 8. So far as the 2022 auction is concerned the stay previously granted will continue. (Madhav J. Jamdar, J) (G. S. Patel, J)

Order - Status 25: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 27: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 29: jvs SALUNKE J V Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2023.01.12 11:15:15 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17629 OF 2022 Dilip Babaji Ulkirde } Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. } Respondents With WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 of 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17631 OF 2022 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar } Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. } Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17630 OF 2022 Shouakat A. Wahab Isane } and Ors. } Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. } Respondents Mr. Prathamesh D. Bhanushali for the petitioners. Mr. K. S. Thorat, AGP for State. Ms. Rahat Kalpatri i/b. Legasis Partners for respondent no. 4. Ms. Jaya Bagwe for respondent no. 5. Mr. Shubham Agrahari and Mr. Siddhant Marathe i/b. Andha Law Groups (LLP) for respondent no. 6. CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA, Act.CJ.& SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE: JANUARY 11, 2023 1 P.C.: Writ Petition No. 2564 of 2022: 1. The learned advocate for the petitioner, on written instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition. 2. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs. Writ Petition Nos. 2946 of 2021 and 3608 of 2021: 1. These writ petitions are scheduled on 6th February 2023. The same be listed on the scheduled date. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)

Order - Status 4: Amol IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors …Respondents Mr Saurabh Pakale *, i/b PU Malgaonkar, for the Petitioner.* Ms SS Bhende, AGP *, for the Respondent-State.* CORAM G.S. Patel & Neela Gokhale, JJ. DATED: 17th February 2023 PC:- 1. Issue notice to Respondents Nos. 5 and 6. Respondents Nos. 1 to 5 waive service. In addition to service through Court, private service, including by courier and email is permitted.. 2. Affidavit in Reply is to be filed by 10th March 2023. 3. List the matter on 14th March 2023. (Neela Gokhale, J) (G. S. Patel, J) AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV Digitally signed by AMOL PREMNATH Date: 2023.02.20 17:51:48 +0530

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.S. PATEL & HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE, JJ DATE : 14th March, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 13/04/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.S. PATEL & HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE, JJ DATE : 13th April, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 23/06/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: Arun IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through School Education & Sports Dept & Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through School Education & Sports Dept & Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through School Education & Sports Dept & Ors …Respondents ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Date: 2023.08.05 15:12:20 +0530 Mr Saurabh Pakale *, i/b Padmaja U Malgaonkar, for the Petitioner.* Mrs AA Purav, AGP *, for State.* Mr Onkar Wable *, i/b Milind Deshmukh, for Respondents Nos. 5 & 6.* Digitally signed by CORAM G.S. Patel & Neela Gokhale, JJ. DATED: 4th August 2023 PC:- 1. We will require an answer as to the refusal on page 27. Prima facie we are not satisfied that either of these grounds for refusal of the appointment can be sustained. Undoubtedly, every school needs a sport teacher. Whether that sport teacher is described as such or as a trained teacher makes to us no difference at all. We are also unable to see what procedure can be said not to have been followed in the appointment of the trained teacher. 2. The learned AGP will take instructions. 3. List the matter on 9th August 2023. (Neela Gokhale, J) (G. S. Patel, J)

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.S. PATEL & HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE, JJ DATE : 9th August, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 17/10/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1690 OF 2023 Mr. Ashok B. Kolte •• Petitioner. WRIT PETITION NO.1690 OF 2023 Mr. Ashok B. Kolte Petitioner. v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Others Respondents. WKII PEIIIION NO.1091 OF 2023 WITH •• Petitioner. WRIT PETITION NO.1691 OF 2023 Mr. Ajit B.Barve Petitioner. v/s. - The State of Maharashtra & Others Respondents. WRIT PETITION NO.1692 OF 2023 WITH Detitioner •• WRIT PETITION NO.1692 OF 2023 Mr. Santosh Pakale with Mr. Abhishek Karnik and Mr.Nilesh Desai, for the Petitioner in all the Petitions. The State of Maharashtra & Others .. Respondents. Ms. A.A. Purav, AGP for Respondent-State in all the Petitions. CORAM: SUNIL B. SHUKRE & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATE : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2023. P.C:- The learned AGP seeks further time in the matter to file Affidavit-in-Reply. 2 Stand over to 3rd October, 2023. (FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA ,J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE,J.) 904-wp-1690-2023.doc S.R.JOSHI 1 of 1 Signed by: Smita R. Joshi Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 04/09/2023 19:02:19

Order - Status 20: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents SHARAD PATIL Digitally signed by SHARAD PATIL Date: 2024.02.14 11:01:07 +0530 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Amol Janrao and Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Ajit Barve and Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b Ms. Padmaja Malgaonkar for the Petitioner in all Petitions. Ms. A.A. Purav AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Milind Deshmukh for Respondent No. 5. .…... ……. CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.M.SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 8 FEBRUARY 2024 P.C.: . All these Writ Petitions are circulated with the preacipe that they are connected with Writ Petition No. 8926 of 2023. Learned counsel for the Petitioners in Writ Petition No. 8926 of 2023 is not informed and he is also not aware whether these Petitions are identical or not. Remove from Board. Liberty to file fresh preacipe. (M.M.SATHAYE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 21: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 21st February, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 15/04/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Saurabh Pakale, Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b Ms. Padmaja Umesh Malgaonkar for Petitioner Ms. Pooja Joshi-Deshpande, AGP for State-Res Nos. 1 to 4 Mr. Milind Deshmukh for Res Nos. 5 & 6 in all WPS CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 26th March, 2024 P.C. : Stand over to 02/04/2024 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 2nd April, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 28/06/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 25: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 2nd April, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 04/04/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 27: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Saurabh Pakale, Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b Ms. Padmaja Umesh Malgaonkar for Petitioner Ms. Pooja Joshi-Deshpande, AGP for State-Res Nos. 1 to 4 Mr. Milind Deshmukh for Res Nos. 5 & 6 in all WPS CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 4th April, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 06/05/2024 ( for directions). ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 28: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Saurabh Pakale, Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b Ms. Padmaja Umesh Malgaonkar for Petitioner Ms. Pooja Joshi-Deshpande, AGP for State-Res Nos. 1 to 4 Mr. Milind Deshmukh for Res Nos. 5 & 6 in all WPS CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 4th April, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 06/05/2024 ( for passing orders). ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 29: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Saurabh Pakale, Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b Ms. Padmaja Umesh Malgaonkar for Petitioner Ms. Pooja Joshi-Deshpande, AGP for State-Res Nos. 1 to 4 Mr. Milind Deshmukh for Res No. 5 in all WPS CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 4th April, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 06/05/2024 ( for passing orders). ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 31: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra through School Education and Sports Deptt. & Ors. ... Respondents with WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra through School Education and Sports Deptt. & Ors. ... Respondents with WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra through School Education and Sports Deptt. & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b. Padmaja Malgaonkar for the Petitioners in both Petitions Mr. Milind Deshmukh for the Respondent No.5 Mr. S.B. Kalel, AGP for the Respondent – State in WP 1690/23 Ms. Pooja Joshi Deshpande, AGP for the Respondent – State in WP 1691/23 and 1692/23 CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 29 APRIL 2024 P.C. :- It is the contention of the Petitioner that the Deputy Director of Education could not have taken review of the earlier approvals granted and such review is only on exceptional grounds such as fraud, misrepresentation and collusion. After the matter was closed for orders, it is noticed that certain factual clarification is required from the State. A show cause notice in all these Petitions is also issued to the erstwhile Education Officer who is named in the show cause notice and subject of the show cause notice is regarding the orders passed by this Education Officer. Therefore, though the reply affidavit has been filed, it does not explain as to why a show cause notice is issued to the Education Officer and whether the orders passed by this Education Officer have been taken in review because of collusion. The State will have to file reply as to whether there was any allegation of collusion between the Respondent – Management and the Education Officer. Stand over to 8 May 2024. M.M. SATHAYE, J. NITIN JAMDAR, J.

Order - Status 34: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 8th May, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 14/06/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 36: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 14th June, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 05/09/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 37: 52 WP-1690-2023.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. …Respondents HUSENBASHA Digitally signed by HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF Date: 2024.07.04 14:23:21 +0530 RAHAMAN NADAF WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. …Respondents *** Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b. Ms. Padmaja Malgaonkar, for Petitioner . Mr. S.B. Kalel AGP for Respondent/State in WP/1690/2023 and WP/1691/2023. *** Mr. V.M. Mali, AGP for Respondent/State in WP/1692/2023. CORAM: NITIN JAMDAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 3 JULY 2024 P.C.: . Papers of the Petitions are not placed before the Court. The learned AGP seeks further time. The Registry will ensure that papers are placed before the Court on the next date, failing which to take necessary steps for reconstruction. Stand over to 24 July 2024. Reply to be filed by 18 July 2024. ( M.M. SATHAYE, J.) ( NITIN JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 41: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 5th August, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 19/09/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 42: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 19th August, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 22/11/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 43: 35.WP.1690.2023 - B.doc ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Digitally signed by ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Date: 2024.09.04 17:46:01 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte … Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Others … Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve … Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Others … Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao … Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Others … Respondents. Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b. Padmaja Malgaonkar for the Petitioners in all Petitions. Mr. Milind Deshmukh for the Respondent No. 5 in all Writ Petitions. Mr. S.B. Kalel, AGP for Respondents – State in all Writ Petitions. CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M. M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATED : 4 SEPTEMBER 2024 P.C.: We had called upon the State to file additional affidavit to point out whether there was any case of fraud, collusion or misrepresentation which had led to passing of the impugned order by the Deputy Director of Education The collusion if at all, would be between the Respondent-Management and the Education Officer. Therefore, it was expected that the reply was to be filed by the Deputy Director of Education. Instead, it is the Deputy Education Inspector has filed the reply and has avoided to mention anything about collusion between the Respondent – Management and the concerned Education Officer. The affidavit should be by the Deputy Director of Education, who is further directed to explain whether any departmental action is initiated or pending against the concerned Education Officer, if it is the case of collusion. Let the affidavit be filed by the Deputy Director of Education by 18 September 2024. Stand over to 20 September 2024. (M. M. SATHAYE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 47: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE :- 16th OCTOBER, 2024 P.C :- At the time of rising at 6.30 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks. Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue. The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date. Subject to the above, list these matters as under:- Serial Nos. of matters on the Board To be To be listed in the listed on category 20 – 31 14.11.2024 Interim Applications 9 to 17 19.11.2024 Fresh Admissions 8, 32 to 50 2.12.2024 Due Category 51 to 70 3.12.2024 71 to 95 4.12.2024 96 to 118 5.12.2024 119 to 143 6.12.2024 (except Sr. Nos.45, 56, 76, 141 & 142) (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Husen

Order - Status 48: .. 1 .. common order IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. Date :- 19th NOVEMBER, 2024 Per Court :- At the time of rising at 5.45 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks. Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue. The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date. Subject to the above, list these matters as under:- Serial Nos. of matters on the Board To be listed on To be listed in the category 51 to 63 27/11/2024 Fresh Admission 66 to 69, 71 27/11/2024 Fresh Admission 72 & 73 14/12/2024 For Admission 76 to 79, 81, 83 to 92 28/11/2024 Urgent Admission 93 to 95 29/11/2024 Interim Application Order 96 to 102 24/02/2025 Due Admission 104 to 135 2 Due Admission 136 to 146 25/02/2025 common order 104 to 135 24/02/2025 Due Admission 136 to 146 25/02/2025 Due Admission 148 to 160 25/02/2025 Due Admission 161 to 189 26/02/2025 Due Admission 191 to 204 27/02/2025 Due Admission 206 to 221 27/02/2025 Due Admission 224 to 254 256 to 275 28/02/2025 28/02/2025 Due Admission Due Admission 276 to 277 16/12/2024 Final hearing (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Harish Signed by: Harish V. Chaudhari Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 22/11/2024 18:05:15

Order - Status 51: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT Mr. Suresh Pakale, Sr. Adv. a/w Mr. Nilesh Desai & Ms. Netra Tembe for the Petitioner Adv. K. S. Thorat, B. Pnl & Adv. N. M. Mehra, AGP for the State - Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ DATE : 4th December, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 10/12/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 53: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte. … Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve. … Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao. … Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents. **** Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Nilesh Desai, Ms. Netra Tembe, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.S. Thorat, 'B' Panel Advocate, for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4./State. Mr. Milind Deshmukh, for Respondent No. 5. **** CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. DATE : 10th DECEMBER, 2024 P.C. : We have considered the submissions of the learned Advocates for the respective sides. Save and except, a bald statement that there are irregularities and illegalities committed in the appointment of these Petitioners, we hardly find any material before us, which could substantiate the stand taken by the Deputy Director Education. Moreover, a report has been submitted by Shri Rajesh Kshirsagar, Deputy Director Education-cum-Authorised Officer Education, office of the Divisional Education, Pune that there are no irregularities and the appointments of these Petitioners appear to be in order. However, he further concludes that the provisions of the MEPS Act, 1977 and MEPS Rules, 1981 have not been strictly followed. The issue before us is as to whether these Petitioners who have been working for more than 12 years, can be disturbed or dislodged on account of some irregularities that might have been committed by the Management. If that be so, since the Management is whole and sole incharge of carrying out recruitment process, the issue would turn upon the Management. However, no affidavit in reply has yet been filed by the Management i.e. Rayat Shikshan Sanstha. In view of the above, we grant time to the Management to file a common affidavit in reply in the first Petition and explain as to whether there were any irregularities and if at all some irregularities are noticed, whether we should attribute the same to the conduct of the Management. Let the reply be filed on or before 10th January, 2025. List this Petition on 22nd January, 2025, to be called out after the fresh admissions board is over. Interim protection granted to these Petitioners would continue until disposal of these Petitions, which we intend to do on the next date. Unpaid salaries of these Petitioners from the dates of the impugned orders, shall be paid to the Petitioners prior to the next date in the matter and the regular salary would also be paid. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Digitally signed by ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR Date: 2024.12.13 19:29:44 +0530

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 4201 of 2021 Koyana Educational Society,Patan Petitioner v/s. Shalmali Shripad Laghate & Anr. … Respondents WITH Writ Petition No. 4197 of 2021 Koyana Educational Society,Patan Petitioner v/s. Vasim Ismail Ambekari & Anr. … Respondents WITH Writ Petition No. 4198 of 2021 Koyana Educational Society,thr its General Secretary Petitioner v/s. Shobha Vijaykumar Patil & Anr. … Respondents WITH Writ Petition No. 4202 of 2021 Koyana Educational Society,Patna v/s. Petitioner Almas Akbar Mulla and Anr. … Respondents WITH Writ Petition No. 4199 of 2021 Koyana Educational Society,Patna Petitioner v/s. Rajashri Ravindra Joshi & Anr. … Respondents Mr. Vinayak Kumbhar i/b Ms. Ashwini N. Bandiwadekar, Advocate for the Petitioner in all Petitions. Mrs. S.S. Bhende , AGP for the State. CORAM : S.V. Gangapurwala & R.N.Laddha, JJ. 16th September 2022 P.C. Issue notice to Respondents, returnable on 25th November 2022. (R.N.Laddha, J) (S.V.Gangapurwala, J) Lata Panjwani, P.S.

Order - Status 4: TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI Digitally signed by TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI Date: 2023.02.06 17:26:15 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni …Petitioner V/s. Gauri Sagar Kukarni And Ors …Respondents Mr. Siddharth R. Karpe a/w Mr. Dipak Y. Jadhav for Petitioner. Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for Respondent No.3 (State). CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 03, 2023 P.C.: The petitioner challenges order of grant of maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. According to the petitioner as of today, arrears of Rs.10,00,000/- are due. He states that the petitioner is ready to deposit amount of Rs.5,00,000/- before the learned Magistrate within one (1) week from today and remaining amount of Rs.5,00,000/- within two (2) weeks thereafter. The statement on behalf of the petitioner is accepted as undertaking. In view of the said statement, the arrest warrant issued against the petitioner shall not be executed. It is made clear that in case of failure of petitioner to deposit Rs.5,00,000/- before the learned Magistrate within one (1) week from today or remaining Rs.5,00,000/- within two (2) weeks thereafter, ad-interim relief granted earlier shall stand vacated without further reference to the court. Stand over to 24th February 2023. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni …Petitioner V/s. Gauri Sagar Kulkarni And Ors …Respondents Mr. Siddharth R. Karpe a/w Mr. Dipak Y. Jadhav for Petitioner. Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for Respondent No.3 (State). CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 03, 2023 P.C.: The petitioner challenges order of grant of maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. According to the petitioner as of today, arrears of Rs.10,00,000/- are due. He states that the petitioner is ready to deposit amount of Rs.5,00,000/- before learned Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai within one (1) week from today and remaining amount of Rs.5,00,000/- within two (2) weeks thereafter. The statement on behalf of the petitioner is accepted as undertaking. In view of the said statement, the arrest warrant issued against the petitioner shall not be executed. It is made clear that in case of failure of petitioner to deposit Rs.5,00,000/- before the learned Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai within one (1) week from today or remaining Rs.5,00,000/- within two (2) weeks thereafter, ad-interim relief granted earlier shall stand vacated without further reference to the court. Stand over to 24 th February 2023. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) (The order is modified as per order dated 7th January, 2023. The corrections in the paragraph 1 and 3 are inserted and corrected which shows in italicize)

Order - Status 6: Ghuge IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni … Petitioner V/s. Gauri Sagar Kulkarni And Ors … Respondents Mr. Siddharth Karpe for the petitioner. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 7, 2023 P.C.: Not on board. Taken on board for speaking to the minutes. In the cause title the instead of word "Kukarni" be substituted by "Kulkarni". In paragraph 1 instead of words "Section 125 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908" be substituted by "Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973". In paragraph 1 and 3 instead of words "before the learned Magistrate" be substituted by "learned Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai". Order be corrected and uploaded as order no.2 in this matter. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni ....PETITIONER V/S Gauri Sagar Kukarni And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 24th February, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 31/03/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni ....PETITIONER V/S Gauri Sagar Kukarni And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN J DATE : 31st March, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 06/06/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: Shailaja IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4959 OF 2022 ….. …. Sagar Suhar Kulkarni ] Petitioner Vs. Gauri Sagar Kulkarni and others ] Respondents. Mr. Siddharth Karpe, for Petitioner. Mr. N.B. Patil, A.P.P, for Respondent No.3-State. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATE : 6th JUNE, 2023. P.C. The petitioner has complied with the directions issued by this Court vide an order dated 3rd February, 2023 by depositing an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- in two installments i.e first installment on 10th February, 2023 and second installment on 23rd February, 2023 in the Family Court at Bandra. Since there is due compliance of the directions issued by this Court, there shall be no coercive action against the petitioner. Issue notice to the respondent returnable on 4th July, 2023. In addition to the Court's notice, the petitioner shall serve the respondents with private notice and file an affidavit of service. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2509 OF 2014 Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. P. M. Palshikar for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. CORAM : N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 07 APRIL, 2014 P.C.: The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Labour Court, Mumbai has not considered the stand of the Petitioner that 5 th Pay Commission, upon which the reliance was sought by the Respondent, was made applicable only after execution of the agreement dated 25 June 2004 and the Respondent had obtained voluntary retirement scheme on 31 May 2004 and therefore, it was not applicable to him. Issue notice to the Respondent, returnable on 5 May 2014. Till further orders, the Respondent will not take coercive steps based on the impugned order. (N.M. JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 29: Sequeira IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2509 of 2014 The Maharashtra State Cooperative Marketing Federation. .. Petitioner Vs. Shri Balkrishna Ganpati Salunkhe. .. Respondent Mr.P.M.Palshikar, for the Petitioner. Mr.Vaibhav Gaikwad, for the Respondent. CORAM: N.M.Jamdar, J. Monday 23 November, 2015 P.C. : Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The Petitioner Federation challenges the order dated 3 August 2013 passed by Labour Court, Mumbai allowing application filed by the Respondentmember under Section 33 (c)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Labour Court has accepted the claim of the Respondent No.1 for entitlement of difference and wages for the period from 1 June 2003 to 31 May 2004 after applicability of recommendation from 5th Pay Commission and certain other findings. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that some employees of the Federation who were not in the category of workmen had filed Writ petition No.4274 of 2009 and 4267 of 2009 with the Aurangabad bench of this Court and the Division bench had granted identical relief which is granted by the Labour Court in the present case. The learned counsel submitted that the Federation has challenged the decision of the Division bench by way of Civil Appeal Nos.4521 and 4522 of 2013 and the Apex Court has admitted and granted leave and unconditionally stayed the operation of the orders. Copies of the orders are placed on record. In view of this position, Rule. Respondent waives service. The interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b). Liberty to apply after the decision of the Apex Court is rendered. (N.M.Jamdar, J.)

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 3: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 9: ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4950 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms.Pallavi Dabholkar i/by Mr. S.Y.Katkade for the Petitioners. Mr. K. Narayanan i/by M/s. Narayanan & Narayanan for Respondent Nos. 1 & 3 to 6. CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED : 10th November, 2008. P.C. . The learned counsel appearing for Respondent in Writ Petition No.4905 of 2008 stating certain development needs to be taken on record by an affidavit and the same be filed within a period of one week. Adjourned to 17/11/2008. [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4950 OF 2008 P.R.Enterprises, Mumbai .. Petitioners V/s. Kalyanji K.Gada (Since deceased through his LR's) Mrs.Maniben K.Gada & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.S.Y.Katkade for the Petitioners. Mr.K.Narayanan i/b.Narayanan & Narayanan for Respondent Nos.1, 3 to 6. CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATE : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2008. P.C. . Admit. Rule, returnable on 9th February, 2008. No coercive steps pursuant to the impugned order. The learned counsel for the Respondent waives service. (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.)