All Writ Petition (Civil)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1/1 WRIT PETITION NO. 6874 OF 2022 Sagar Dnyaneshwar Naik … Petitioner Vs The State Election Commission of Maharashtra thr. State Election Commission & Ors. … Respondents Mr Ranjit Thorat, Sr. Advocate a/w. Adv. Siddharth Dharmadhikari i/b. Adv. Vishal Acharya for the Petitioner. Y. D. Patil, AGP for the Respondent-State Adv. Irfan A. Shaikh i/b. Adv. S. B. Shetye for the Respondent No. 1 Mr. Sandeep Marne for the Respondent Adv. Saurabh a/w. Adv. Harshad Sathe for the intervernor CORAM : A. A. SAYED & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ DATED : 16th JUNE 2022 P.C.: Leave to amend the Petition. Amendment to be carried out within two working days. Amended copy of the Petition be served upon the Respondents. Stand over to 27th June, 2022. ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Digitally signed by ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Date: 2022.06.16 20:55:20 +0530 (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (A. A. SAYED, J.)

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6874 OF 2022 Sagar Dnyaneshwar Naik ….Petitioner Versus The State Election Commission and Ors. ….Respondents Mr. Raj Adhia i/b. Mr. Vishal Valmik Acharya, Advocate for the Petitioner. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 14th JULY, 2022. P.C. : Not on board. Mentioned by way of praecipe and, therefore, the order is passed on the praecipe itself. To be heard along with writ petition No.8275 of 2022. Stand over to 21st July, 2022. To be placed high on board. (SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8275 OF 2022 Sharad Shivaji Jamdar ….Petitioner Versus Divisional Commissioner Pune and anr ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6877 OF 2022 Naresh Ganpat Mahske ….Petitioner Versus The State Election Commission of Maharashtra through Election Commissioner and Ors. ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6874 OF 2022 Sagar Dnyaneshwar Naik ….Petitioner Versus The State Election Commission of Maharashtra through Election Commissioner and Ors. ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7266 OF 2022 Sharad Anandrao Patil ….Petitioner Versus Ld.District Collector of Kolhapur and Ors. ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8418 OF 2022 SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN Digitally signed by SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN Date: 2022.07.22 12:29:03 +0530 5 wp 8275-22.doc Gaurav Ulhas Bhagat and Anr. ….Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8087 OF 2022 Rahul Ramchandra Pasale and anr ….Petitioners Versus The State Election Commission and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8155 OF 2022 Prakash Rahul Ramchandra Pasale and Ors. ….Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra thr. Secre. Rural Development Dept. and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8156 OF 2022 Mahaveer Anna Patil and ors ….Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra thr. Secre. Rural Development Dept. and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8159 OF 2022 Arunrao Jaysingrao Ingawale and ors ….Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra thr. Secre. Rural Development Dept. and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8132 OF 2022 5 wp 8275-22.doc Nitin Jaysingrao Kharade and ors ….Petitioners Versus State Election Commission, Maharashtra and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8045 OF 2022 Sanjay Namdev Khot ….Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra thr. Secre. Rural Development Dept. and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8247 OF 2022 Shri Hanmant Dharamraj Kolawale ….Petitioner Versus State Election Commission, Maharashtra and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8249 OF 2022 Shri Pundalik Ravaji Patil ….Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra thr. Secre. Rural Development Dept. and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8270 OF 2022 Sanjeev Nanik Khailare ….Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.16769 OF 2022 Amar @ Hambirrao Dinkar Patil ….Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra thr. Secre. Rural Development Dept. and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8344 OF 2022 Shri. Amarsinh Gopalrao Ghorpade Versus ….Petitioner Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8396 OF 2022 Kantilal Ramrao Narsale And Ors Petitioners Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Ors Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8558 OF 2022 Mr. Shrimant Shamrao Jadhav Petitioner Versus The State Election Commission Of Maharashtra Thru State Election Commissioner And Ors. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.16839 OF 2022 Shri Ravindra Bandu Patil and anr. ….Petitioners Versus The State Election Commission, Maharashtra and ors ….Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8557 OF 2022 Mohan Ramchandra Chaudhary ...Petitioner Versus The District Collector, Pune And Ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8101 OF 2022 Chandradip Shashikant Marke ….Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra thr. Secre. Rural Development Dept. and ors ….Respondents Sr. Adv. Anil V. Anturkar a/w Mr. Amol Gatne for petitioner in WP No. 8275/2022 Mr. Shekhar Jagtap a/w Mr. Ranjeet Nimbalkar i.b. Mr. Mayuresh Ingale for applicant in IA St No. 17101/2022. Mr. Pradeep J. Thorat a/w MR. Chirag Shah and Mr. Raj Adhia i.b. Mr. Shyam Jadhav for petitioner in WP No. 6877/2022 Sr. Adv . R. S. Apte i.b. Mr. N. R. Bubna for R. No. 2 and 3 in WP No. 6877/2022 Sr. Adv. Ranjit Thorat i.b. Mr. Vishal Acharya for petitioner in W.P. No. 6874/2022 Ms. Lucy Massey for applicant in IA 16679/2022 in WP No. 6874/2022 Mr. Manoj Patil for petitioner in W. P. No. 7266/2022 Mr. Surel Shah i.b. Mr. Vishwajeet V. Mohite for petitioner in WP No. 8418/2022 Mr. Abhijeet Kulkarni for petitioner in WP No. 8087/2022 and i.b. DD and Abhijit Associates for petitioner in W. P. No. 8132/2022 Mr. Vaibhav V. Ugale for applicant in IASt. No. 17092/2022 in W.P. No. 8087/2022 Mr. Sandeep S. Koregave for petitioner in WP No. 8159/2022, W.P.No. 8155/2022 Mr. Surel S. Shah i.b. Mr. Sandeep S. Koregave for petitioner in WP No. 8101/2022 , WP No. 8249/2022, WP St No. 16769/2022 Mr. Surel Shah a/w Mr. Swaroop Karade i.b. Mr. Pravin P. Mengane for petitioner in WP No. 8156/2022 Mr. Tejas Hilange for petitioner in W. P. No. 8045/2022 Mr. Samadhan A. Kashid for petitioner in W.P. No. 8247/2022 Mr. Anvil Kalekar for petitioner in W.P. No. 8270/2022 Mr. Vierendra V. Pethe for petitioner in W.P. No. 8344/2022 Mr. Manisha Devkar a/w Mr. S. M. Katkar for petitioner in W. P. No. 8396/2022 Ms. Ekta Tripathi for petitioner in W. P. No. 8558/2022 Mr. Shailesh Chavan for applicant in IA St No. 17779/2022, IA St No. 17776/2022, IA St No. 17777/2022, IA St No. 17778/2022 in WP No. 8558/2022. Mr. Prashant Bhavake for petitioner in W. P.St. No. 16839/2022 Mr. Amjith M. Anandhan a/w Mr. Sachin R. Pawar a/w Mr. Rohan D. Kaiche, Mr. Nikhil P. Mallelwar i.b. Mr. Harshad V. Bhadbhade for petitioner in W. P. 8557/2022. Mr. A. A. Kumbhakoni A. G. a/w Mr. P. P. Kakade, G.P. a/w Mr. A. I. Patel Addl.G.P., Ms. R. M. Shinde AGP (in W.P. No. 8558/2022) a/w Ms. M. S. Bane, AGP (In W.P. No. 8275/2022) a/w Mr. V. S. Gokhale B. Panel Counsel AGP a/w Ms. Sneha Bhange for state – Respondent Mr. Vishwanath Patil a/w Mr. Anikit Lodhe a/w Mr. Kewal Ahya for R. No. 5 in WP No. 5087/2022 and WP No. 8132/2022. ( Solapur Zilla Parishad) Mr. Sachindra B. Shetye a/w Mr. Irfan Shaikh, Ms. Priyanka H. Chavan and Ms. Sarika Shetye for the State Election Commission CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & KISHORE C. SANT, JJ. DATE : 21 JULY 2022 P.C. WP No. 6877/2022 and WP No. 6874/2022 be detagged from the said group and place before an appropriate Bench. Stand over to 25/07/2022. (KISHORE C. SANT, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)

Order - Status 4: TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI Digitally signed by TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI Date: 2023.02.06 17:26:15 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni …Petitioner V/s. Gauri Sagar Kukarni And Ors …Respondents Mr. Siddharth R. Karpe a/w Mr. Dipak Y. Jadhav for Petitioner. Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for Respondent No.3 (State). CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 03, 2023 P.C.: The petitioner challenges order of grant of maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. According to the petitioner as of today, arrears of Rs.10,00,000/- are due. He states that the petitioner is ready to deposit amount of Rs.5,00,000/- before the learned Magistrate within one (1) week from today and remaining amount of Rs.5,00,000/- within two (2) weeks thereafter. The statement on behalf of the petitioner is accepted as undertaking. In view of the said statement, the arrest warrant issued against the petitioner shall not be executed. It is made clear that in case of failure of petitioner to deposit Rs.5,00,000/- before the learned Magistrate within one (1) week from today or remaining Rs.5,00,000/- within two (2) weeks thereafter, ad-interim relief granted earlier shall stand vacated without further reference to the court. Stand over to 24th February 2023. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni …Petitioner V/s. Gauri Sagar Kulkarni And Ors …Respondents Mr. Siddharth R. Karpe a/w Mr. Dipak Y. Jadhav for Petitioner. Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for Respondent No.3 (State). CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 03, 2023 P.C.: The petitioner challenges order of grant of maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. According to the petitioner as of today, arrears of Rs.10,00,000/- are due. He states that the petitioner is ready to deposit amount of Rs.5,00,000/- before learned Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai within one (1) week from today and remaining amount of Rs.5,00,000/- within two (2) weeks thereafter. The statement on behalf of the petitioner is accepted as undertaking. In view of the said statement, the arrest warrant issued against the petitioner shall not be executed. It is made clear that in case of failure of petitioner to deposit Rs.5,00,000/- before the learned Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai within one (1) week from today or remaining Rs.5,00,000/- within two (2) weeks thereafter, ad-interim relief granted earlier shall stand vacated without further reference to the court. Stand over to 24 th February 2023. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) (The order is modified as per order dated 7th January, 2023. The corrections in the paragraph 1 and 3 are inserted and corrected which shows in italicize)

Order - Status 6: Ghuge IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni … Petitioner V/s. Gauri Sagar Kulkarni And Ors … Respondents Mr. Siddharth Karpe for the petitioner. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 7, 2023 P.C.: Not on board. Taken on board for speaking to the minutes. In the cause title the instead of word "Kukarni" be substituted by "Kulkarni". In paragraph 1 instead of words "Section 125 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908" be substituted by "Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973". In paragraph 1 and 3 instead of words "before the learned Magistrate" be substituted by "learned Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai". Order be corrected and uploaded as order no.2 in this matter. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni ....PETITIONER V/S Gauri Sagar Kukarni And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 24th February, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 31/03/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni ....PETITIONER V/S Gauri Sagar Kukarni And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN J DATE : 31st March, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 06/06/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: Shailaja IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4959 OF 2022 ….. …. Sagar Suhar Kulkarni ] Petitioner Vs. Gauri Sagar Kulkarni and others ] Respondents. Mr. Siddharth Karpe, for Petitioner. Mr. N.B. Patil, A.P.P, for Respondent No.3-State. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATE : 6th JUNE, 2023. P.C. The petitioner has complied with the directions issued by this Court vide an order dated 3rd February, 2023 by depositing an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- in two installments i.e first installment on 10th February, 2023 and second installment on 23rd February, 2023 in the Family Court at Bandra. Since there is due compliance of the directions issued by this Court, there shall be no coercive action against the petitioner. Issue notice to the respondent returnable on 4th July, 2023. In addition to the Court's notice, the petitioner shall serve the respondents with private notice and file an affidavit of service. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]

Order - Status 9: ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4950 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms.Pallavi Dabholkar i/by Mr. S.Y.Katkade for the Petitioners. Mr. K. Narayanan i/by M/s. Narayanan & Narayanan for Respondent Nos. 1 & 3 to 6. CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED : 10th November, 2008. P.C. . The learned counsel appearing for Respondent in Writ Petition No.4905 of 2008 stating certain development needs to be taken on record by an affidavit and the same be filed within a period of one week. Adjourned to 17/11/2008. [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4950 OF 2008 P.R.Enterprises, Mumbai .. Petitioners V/s. Kalyanji K.Gada (Since deceased through his LR's) Mrs.Maniben K.Gada & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.S.Y.Katkade for the Petitioners. Mr.K.Narayanan i/b.Narayanan & Narayanan for Respondent Nos.1, 3 to 6. CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATE : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2008. P.C. . Admit. Rule, returnable on 9th February, 2008. No coercive steps pursuant to the impugned order. The learned counsel for the Respondent waives service. (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.)

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2509 OF 2014 Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. P. M. Palshikar for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. CORAM : N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 07 APRIL, 2014 P.C.: The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Labour Court, Mumbai has not considered the stand of the Petitioner that 5 th Pay Commission, upon which the reliance was sought by the Respondent, was made applicable only after execution of the agreement dated 25 June 2004 and the Respondent had obtained voluntary retirement scheme on 31 May 2004 and therefore, it was not applicable to him. Issue notice to the Respondent, returnable on 5 May 2014. Till further orders, the Respondent will not take coercive steps based on the impugned order. (N.M. JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 29: Sequeira IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2509 of 2014 The Maharashtra State Cooperative Marketing Federation. .. Petitioner Vs. Shri Balkrishna Ganpati Salunkhe. .. Respondent Mr.P.M.Palshikar, for the Petitioner. Mr.Vaibhav Gaikwad, for the Respondent. CORAM: N.M.Jamdar, J. Monday 23 November, 2015 P.C. : Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The Petitioner Federation challenges the order dated 3 August 2013 passed by Labour Court, Mumbai allowing application filed by the Respondentmember under Section 33 (c)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Labour Court has accepted the claim of the Respondent No.1 for entitlement of difference and wages for the period from 1 June 2003 to 31 May 2004 after applicability of recommendation from 5th Pay Commission and certain other findings. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that some employees of the Federation who were not in the category of workmen had filed Writ petition No.4274 of 2009 and 4267 of 2009 with the Aurangabad bench of this Court and the Division bench had granted identical relief which is granted by the Labour Court in the present case. The learned counsel submitted that the Federation has challenged the decision of the Division bench by way of Civil Appeal Nos.4521 and 4522 of 2013 and the Apex Court has admitted and granted leave and unconditionally stayed the operation of the orders. Copies of the orders are placed on record. In view of this position, Rule. Respondent waives service. The interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b). Liberty to apply after the decision of the Apex Court is rendered. (N.M.Jamdar, J.)

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 3: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.