All First Appeal

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 194 OF 2008 Vinay Prahaladrai Poddar ... Appellant versus Mrs. Rachana Vinay Poddar ...Respondent Mr. V.S. Kapse for the appellant. CORAM : P.B. MAJMUDAR & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATE: OCTOBER 21, 2008 . P.C. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks some time for depositing cost imposed by this Court as per the order dated 23 rd September, 2008. The amount of cost to be deposited before the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority be deposited on or before 24 th October, 2008. Adjourned to 12 th November, 2008. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J.

Order - Status 15: pmw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.194 OF 2008 Mr. Vinay Prahaladrai Poddar … Appellant V/s. Mrs. Rachana Vinay Poddar … Respondent Mr. V.S. Kapse, for the Appellant. Mr. Harish R. Pawar, for Respondent. CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 15th APRIL, 2014 P.C. . The Consent Terms duly signed by the Appellant and the Respondent and their respective Advocates are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The Appellant and Respondent are personally present. Through their respective counsel they state that they have carefully read the terms and conditions incorporated in the Consent Terms and they accept the correctness thereof. The Appellant has handed over to the Respondent, a Banker's cheque in the sum of Rs.8 lakhs in terms of clause 3 of the Consent Terms. By accepting the undertakings in the Consent Terms, we dispose of the Appeal in terms of Consent Terms. Hence, we pass the following order : ORDER (i) The undertakings in the Consent Terms marked "X" for identification are accepted; (ii) The impugned Judgment and Decree dated 17th December, 2007 in Petition No.A811 of 2006 is hereby quashed and set aside and the said Petition No.A818 of 2007 is restored; (iii) By consent, the said Petition is converted into a Petition under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Amendment shall relate back to the date of the institution of the said Petition; (iv) The parties have agreed that reconciliation is not possible and in view of the differences between them, the dissolution for the marriage is the only solution; (v) Accordingly in Petition No.A818 of 2007, there shall be decree of divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The marriage solemnised between the Appellant and Respondent dated 13th February, 2001 is hereby dissolved by the decree of divorce; (vi) The Appeal is disposed of on above terms and in terms of the Consent Terms. There will be no order as to costs. (A.A. SAYED, J ) (A.S.OKA, J )

Order - Status 6: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 136 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's Memoranda of Coram, orders appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders ------------------------------------------------------ Mr. D.R. Tiwari for appellant-wife. Mr. S.C. Thatte for respondent-husband. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, & D.B. BHOSALE,JJ. 18/07/2008. P.C.: . Heard Mr. Tiwari the learned counsel for the appellant-wife. . Admit. . Mr. Thatte waives service for the respondent-husband. . Appeal to be heard with FCA No. 66 of 2008. (D.B. Bhosale,J.) (B.H.Marlapalle,J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER (St) NO.13209 of 2019 Anand Baban Khedkar Appellant vs Yashwant Tatyaba Daundkar Respondent Mr.Amijith Anandhan I.b.Mr,.Sachin Pawar for Appellant. CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J DATE : 22nd JULY, 2019 P.C Heard learned counsel for the Appellant. Issue notice to the Respondent returnable on 19.8.2019. In addition to Court's notice, learned counsel for the Appellant to serve the Respondent by private notice. [M.S.KARNIK,J]

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER STAMP NO. 13209 OF 2019 Ananda Baban Khedkar ....Appellant V/S Yashwant Tatyaba Daundkar ....Respondent CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J DATE : 17th September, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 22/11/2019 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER STAMP NO. 13209 OF 2019 Ananda Baban Khedkar ....Appellant V/S Yashwant Tatyaba Daundkar ....Respondent Adv.Sachin R,Pawar for Appellant CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J DATE : 14th October, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the petitioners / respondent / applicant , Stand over to 11/11/2019 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER STAMP NO. 13209 OF 2019 Ananda Baban Khedkar ....Appellant V/S Yashwant Tatyaba Daundkar ....Respondent Mr.Apmjit M.A. a/w Mr.L.R.Kewat for Appellant. Vilas Babanrao Tapkir Vp For Sole Res. For CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J DATE : 5th February, 2020 P.C. : Stand over to 06/02/2020 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 14: Tandle IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO. 13209 OF 2019 Ananda Baban Khedkar ... Appellant Versus Yashwant Tatyaba Daundkar ... Respondent. Mr. Sachin R. Pawar for the Appellant. Mr. V. B. Tapkir for the Respondent. - - - - - - - CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 6th FEBRUARY, 2020 P. C. : After hearing the learned counsel for the appellant at length when this Court expressed its disinclination to grant any relief, the learned counsel, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present Appeal unconditionally. Leave and liberty granted. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that, the Trial Court will not get influenced by the dismissal of the present Appeal and shall decide the suit filed by the appellant on its own merits. (A. S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 8: CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1141 OF 2016 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1142 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 16356 OF 2015 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. .. Applicant Vs. 1. Shri Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.Devendranath S. Joshi, Advocate for applicant. CORAM : N.J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 13TH MARCH 2019 P.C. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1141 OF 2016 1 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 4th June 2019. Hamdast granted. Private service is permitted. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1142 OF 2016 1 The learned counsel for the applicantinsurer makes a statement that that the applicantinsurer will deposit the entire amount of compensation along with interest and costs as awarded by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Mumbai by the impugned order dated 6th February 2015 in Application (ECA) No. 4/C3/2009. 2 The statement made by the learned counsel for the applicantinsurer is accepted. The applicantinsurer shall deposit the entire amount of compensation along with interest till date and costs as awarded by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Mumbai within a period of four weeks from today, before the learned Commissioner. 3 In the meanwhile, there shall be adinterim stay to the execution and operation of the impugned order. It is, however, made clear that in the event, the applicantinsurer fails to deposit the aforesaid amount as directed above, the adinterim stay shall stand vacated automatically. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.]

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 16356 OF 2015 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Mumbai Regional Office-i ....APPELLANT V/S Shri. Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole And Anr....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7046 OF 2024 In First Appeal STAMP NO. 16356 OF 2015 Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole ....PETITIONER V/S The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Mumbai Region Office-no.2 ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 1142 OF 2016 In First Appeal STAMP NO. 16356 OF 2015 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Mumbai Regional Office-i ....APPLICANT V/S Shri. Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole And Anr....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 1141 OF 2016 In First Appeal STAMP NO. 16356 OF 2015 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Mumbai Regional Office-i ....APPLICANT V/S Shri. Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole And Anr....RESPONDENT None for the appellant VISHWAMBHAR MAHADEV PARKAR for Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT J DATE : 27th March, 2024 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the Respondent , stand over to 24/04/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 16356 OF 2015 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Mumbai Regional Office-i ....APPELLANT V/S Shri. Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole And Anr....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 1142 OF 2016 In First Appeal STAMP NO. 16356 OF 2015 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Mumbai Regional Office-i ....APPLICANT V/S Shri. Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole And Anr....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 1141 OF 2016 In First Appeal STAMP NO. 16356 OF 2015 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Mumbai Regional Office-i ....APPLICANT V/S Shri. Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole And Anr....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7046 OF 2024 In First Appeal STAMP NO. 16356 OF 2015 Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole ....PETITIONER V/S The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Mumbai Region Office-no.2 ....RESPONDENT Adv. V. M. Parkar for Appellant. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT J DATE : 2nd May, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 09/05/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 4: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 8: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3224 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.699 OF 1999 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3225 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.700 OF 1999 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3226 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.701 OF 1999 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3227 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.702 OF 1999 Office Notes, office : Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, : appearances, Court's : orders or directions : and Registrar's orders : Mr.Anil Ahuja, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr.V.N.Gangal, for the Respondent. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 01, 2006. P.C. :- . Mr.Gangal, the learned counsel for Respondent 2 states that the paper book will be prepared within four weeks. We record this statement. . Let the matters come up on board after four weeks. . Office to supply necessary xerox copies of the record to the learned counsel for Respondent 2. [SMT.RANJANA DESAI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]