All First Appeal

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2892 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO. 24856 OF 2003 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or Judge's orders. orders or directions and Registrar's orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED : 3rd Sept., 2004. P.C.: If the entire amount of Court fee payable in the First Appeal is paid within a period of six weeks from today, the First Appeal will stand restored. If the Court fee is not paid within the stipulated time, the order of dismissal will stand. No further extension will be granted. Civil Application stands disposed of. Judge.

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2892 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 24856 OF 2003 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of of Coram, appearances, Court's orders and Registrar's orders : Court's or Judge's orders ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri K.K. Tated, A.G.P. present for the State. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. DATED: 14TH OCT., 2004 P.C.: Heard learned A.G.P. Shri Tated. Perused the contents of the application including the earlier orders passed by this Court and the Ordinance of the State Government. In view of the circumstances, it is necessary for the applicant State to get the proviso of Sec.2 clarified and for that purpose further explanation is necessary. Hence in supersession of the earlier order passed by this Court, extension of 8 weeks' is granted to pay Court fee. Matter be placed before the Court after seven weeks. .....

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2892 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 24856 OF 2003 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of of Coram, appearances, Court's orders and Registrar's orders : Court's or Judge's orders ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri K.K. Tated, A.G.P. present for the State. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. DATED: 14TH OCT., 2004 P.C.: Heard learned A.G.P. Shri Tated. Perused the contents of the application including the earlier orders passed by this Court and the Ordinance of the State Government. In view of the circumstances, it is necessary for the applicant State to get the proviso of Sec.2 clarified and for that purpose further explanation is necessary. Hence in supersession of the earlier order passed by this Court, extension of 8 weeks' is granted to pay Court fee. Matter be placed before the Court after seven weeks. .....

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.552 OF 2013 M/s.Neha Enterprises .. Appellants Versus Smt.Marubai Narayan Thakur and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.V.A.Thorat, Senior Advocate i/b. R.A.Thorat, Senior Advocate with Mr.Himanshu Kode i/b. Mr.S.A.Sawant for the appellants Mr.P.S.Dani i/b. Mr.Amol Patil for respondent Nos. 10A and 10B CORAM : S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. 13rd June 2013. P.C.: 1] When this appeal from order was listed for admission pursuant to the order of the learned Vacation Judge on private notice the contesting respondents 10A and 10B have appeared and Mr.Dani, learned Counsel states that Mr.Amol Patil, Advocate has instructions to appear for them and a caveat has also been filed on their behalf. He further states that he would file vakalatnama on their behalf within a week. 2] At the request of the caveators' Advocate and in order to enable him to file vakalatnama and take instructions, S.O. 26th June 2013. Ad-interim order to continue till 1st July 2013. (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J)

Order - Status 9: mnm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APEAL FROM ORDER NO. 552 OF 2013 M/s. Neha Enterprises Appellants Vs. Mrs. Marubai Narayan Thakur & Ors. Respondents Mr. V.A. Thorat, Sr. Advocate a/w. R.A. Thorat and S.A. Sawant for Appellants Mr. Ajay Patil for Respondent No.6 Mr. Rohit Sachdeo for Respondent Nos. 7 to 9 Mr. P.S. Dani i/b. A.B. Patil and D.D. Ausarkar for Respondent Nos. 10A and 10B CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 1ST JULY, 2013 P.C. : The impugned order of the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Panvel dated 14th May, 2013 shows the setting out of the facts and arguments of the Advocates of the parties with regard to the main issue No. 1 in paragraphs 1 to 36 of the order. The issue which has been answered in paragraph 37 does not show the reasons for acceptance of the arguments of one party or rejection of arguments of the other. Both Counsel agree that the order cannot be sustained for want of reasons. Based upon the same facts and arguments the learned Judge would require to give his reasons for coming to the conclusion that he does. However both parties would be entitled to reargue the application under Exhibit42 on a single specified date of hearing upon which the learned Judge shall pass an order with reasons. The learned Judge shall fix a clear date in the month of July, 2013 for the aforesaid purpose. Consequently the impugned order is set aside. The interim order passed in this Appeal from Order shall continue until the disposal of Exhibit42 application by the learned Judge and two weeks thereafter. The Appeal from Order is disposed of accordingly. The civil application is also disposed of accordingly. (MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J.)

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.215 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION ST. NO. 16537 OF 2011 ARISIN FROM CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 383 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 216 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION ST. NO. 16539 OF 2011 ARISING FROM CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 382 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or orders or directions & Judge's orders. Registrar's orders. Shri D. Khambata, Sr. Counsel along with Shri Minoo Siodia along with Shri Agrawal Nikhil and Shri Kaushik N. Singh i/by Rustomji and Ginwala for the Applicant. Shri Vijay Thorat, Sr. Counsel along with Shri Ranjit Shetty and Shri Luckyraj Indorkar i/by Hariani & Co. for the Respondents. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE :28TH JUNE, 2011 P.C.: . Not on board. Taken on board. Heard learned senior counsel appearing for the Applicant and the learned senior counsel appearing for the Respondent. Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Delay is condoned. The Applications are accordingly allowed. ( A.S.OKA, J )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4039 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.157 OF 1996 The State of Maharashtra .. Appellant V/s. Bapu Ragho Patil .. Respondent (Since deceased through his LR's) Smt.Mirabai Bapu Patil Mr.S.V.More for the Appellant/Applicant. Mr.Prashant Jadhav for the Respondent. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : 2ND SEPTEMBER, 2008. P.C. By the above Civil Application, the Applicant prays for condonation of delay in filing the Application and for bringing the heirs of the original Respondent on record. Shri S.D.Patil has filed his appearance for the said heirs. The Civil Application is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clauses 'b' and 'c'. The Civil Application is, accordingly, disposed of. The learned A.G.P. to carry out the amendment in the cause title of the Appeal within four weeks from date. [R.M.SAVANT, J.]