Tag: Criminal Quashing Of Fir C.R.

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 500 OF 2015 Jyotsana Kiran kale. ..Applicant. Versus Shravani Santosh Ambekar and Another. ..Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 501 OF 2015 Santosh R. Ambekar & Ors. ..Applicants. Versus Shravani Santosh Ambekar and Another. ..Respondents. Ms. Shivangi J. Rajak for the Applicants. Mr. Mayur D. Sapkale for Respondent No.1. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, learned APP for the State. Coram : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. Date : June 15, 2015 . P. C. : The Applicants are seeking to quash FIR against them bearing CR No.72 of 2015 registered with Vikroli Police Station at the instance of Respondent No.1 for the offence punishable under sections 498A and 406 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The Applicants are the accused in the said CR, who have invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash the said FIR by consent of the original complainant Respondent No.1 herein. Applicant No.1 in APL No. 501 is the husband of Respondent No.1 and rest of the Applicants are his family members. The Applicant in APL is the sister-in-law of Respondent No. 1. Matrimonial disputes between the parties gave rise to the filing of above FIR. The learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties submitted that during the pendency of investigation into above FIR, with the help and intervention of family members, friends and well-wishers, the parties amicably settled their differences by way of mutual settlement. Pursuant to the same, present applications are filed for quashing the above FIR, by consent of Respondent No.1 In the present applications filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Respondent No.1 has filed separate affidavits dated 27th May 2015 wherein she has stated that she is not interested in continuing with the said FIR. She has solemnly affirmed that she is withdrawing all the allegations made against the Petitioner in the said FIR and that she has no objection for quashing the proceedings of FIR bearing No. 72 of 2015 registered by her with Vikhroli Police Station against the Applicants. Respondent No.1 is personally present before the Court. On specific query made by us, she submitted that she has made the said affidavits on her own free will, without there being any pressure or undue influence. She has further confirmed that she has no objection for quashing the FIR in question lodged by her against the Applicants for the offence punishable under sections 498A and 406 read with of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The Apex Court in B. S. Joshi vs. State of Haryana reported [AIR 2003 SC 1386] has held that in the event of settlement of matrimonial dispute, the FIR under Section 498A can be quashed, even though the said offence is not compoundable in terms of Section 320 of the Cr.P.C. The relevant observations of the Apex Court are contained in Paras 14 and 15 which are reproduced herein below: "14. There is no doubt that the object of introducing Chapter XX-A containing Section 498A in the Indian Penal Code was to prevent the torture to a woman by her husband or by relatives of her husband. Section 498A was added with a view to punishing a husband and his relatives who harass or torture the wife to coerce her or her relatives to satisfy unlawful demands of dowry. The hyper-technical view would be counter productive and would act against interests of women and against the object for which this provision was added. There is every likelihood that non-exercise of inherent power to quash the proceedings to meet the ends of justice would prevent women from settling earlier. That is not the object of Chapter XXA of Indian Penal Code. In view of the above discussion, we hold that the High Court in exercise of its inherent powers can quash criminal proceedings or FIR or complaint and Section 320 of the Code does not limit or affect the powers under Section 482 of the Code." Similar view has been taken by the Full Bench of this Court in Abasaheb Yadav Honmane vs. State of Maharashtra [2008(5) LJ.Soft 46]. It can, thus, be seen that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. From the perusal of complaint, it transpires that the allegations are totally personal in nature. There is no element of public law involved in the crime. The offence alleged cannot be said to have any impact on the society. In these circumstances, and especially, in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab, [(2008) 4 SCC 582], we find that no purpose would be served by keeping the criminal proceedings pending except burdening the Criminal Courts which are already overburdened. In the light of the principles laid down by the Apex Court in the aforesaid decision as well as in the case of Narinder Singh vs. State of Punjab [2014 AIR SCW 2065] we are of the considered view that there is no impediment in quashing the FIR in question. In the circumstances, applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). The learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 sought directions to the police to return the jewellery recovered or attached by the police during the course of investigation into above FIR. The learned Counsel appearing for the Applicants in both the applications, after taking instructions from her clients, states that the Applicants have no objection for return of the said jewellery to Respondent No.1. Respondent No.1 shall make a proper application to the police for return of jewellery. Upon such application, police will take appropriate decision within a week of its filing. [SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.268 OF 2019 (Malhari Tulshiram Sadafule Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another) Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances,Court's orders, or directions, and Registrar's Orders Ms Manisha Devkar for Petitioner. CORAM : R. G. KETKAR, J. DATE : 28TH FEBRUARY, 2019 P.C.: Not on Board. At the request of Ms Devkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, taken up in the production Board. Respondent No.2 had filed proceedings under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') before the trial Court. By order dated 12.04.2010, maintenance @ Rs.1,300/- per month with effect from 10.06.2008 was awarded to the respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 thereafter filed proceedings under Section 127 of Cr.P.C. for enhancing the maintenance amount. By order dated 30.05.2016, the learned Judge, Family Court No.3, Mumbai allowed the Petition and directed the petitioner herein to pay enhanced maintenance @ Rs.12,000/- per month to the respondent No.2 from the date of the Petition i.e. 17.04.2014. Ms Devkar, on instructions, states that petitioner has paid the maintenance from 17.04.2014 till June, 2018 @ Rs.12,000/- per month as per the order dated 30.05.2016. From July, 2018 onwards, he has not paid the maintenance as he has filed proceedings for cancelling the maintenance amount from 30.04.2018 on the ground that petitioner has attained superannuation. On instructions, she further states that before the next date of hearing, petitioner will deposit the arrears of maintenance of Rs.84,000/- (from July 2018 to 28.02.2019 @ Rs.12,000/- per month) in this Court. In view thereof, list the Petition for 'admission' on 14.03.2019 in the Supplementary Board. Till next date, subject to the petitioner depositing Rs.84,000/- in this Court before the next date of hearing, order dated 04.12.2018 issuing distress warrant against the petitioner herein is stayed. No coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner till next date. It is further made clear that in case the petitioner does not deposit arrears within the stipulated time, this protection shall stand vacated without further reference to the Court. (R. G. KETKAR, J.) Minal Parab

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 268 OF 2019 Malhari Tulshiram Sadafule ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent Manisha Arjun Devkar For Petitioner CORAM : RAJESH G. KETKAR, J DATE : 14th March, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned for 28/03/2019 on supplementary board. In the meantime, Ad-interim relief if any, granted earlier to continue. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 268 OF 2019 Malhari Tulshiram Sadafule ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent CORAM : RAJESH G. KETKAR, J DATE : 28th March, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned for 18/04/2019 on supplementary board. In the meantime, Ad-interim relief if any, granted earlier to continue. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 538 OF 2014 Amit Prakash Jaste ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents ..... Rishi Bhuta a/w. Monish Bohra i/b. A.S.Khan & Associates, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs.P.P.Shinde, A.P.P. for the Respondent/State. .... CORAM : M.L.TAHALIYANI J. DATED : 20TH AUGUST, 2014 P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. S.O. to 03/09/2014. In the meantime, there shall be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) JUDGE

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.538 of 2014 Amit Prakash Jaste .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr .. Respondents Mr.Rishi Bhuta and Mr.Manish Bohra i/b M/s.A.S.Khan & Associates for the applicant. Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP for the Respondent State. ­­­ CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 14th NOVEMBER 2014. ­­­ P.C. : 1 Heard. 2 Rule. 3 Rule made returnable on 1st December 2014. 4 To be listed for final hearing at the end of the admission board along with other connected Writ Petitions which have, by an order dated 6th August 2014 already been directed to be listed for final hearing in the first week of December 2014. 5 In the mean time, the learned Magistrate shall not proceed further with the case. (ABHAY M.THIPSAY, J)

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 538 OF 2014 Amit Prakash Jaste .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents Mr.Sunny Singh i/b A.S.Khan & Associates, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.M.G.Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP for the Respondent No.1 State. CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 01st December, 2014. P.C. : 1 Mr.M.G.Shukla, the learned Counsel for respondent No.2 states that he has already received copy of the application. Mr.Sunny Singh, the learned Counsel for the applicant prays for time. 2 Granted finally. Stand over to 12/12/2014. 3 To be placed along with Writ Petition No. 834 of 2014 to Writ Petition No. 847 of 2014, Writ Petition No. 1494 of 2014 & Writ Petition No. 1495 of 2014, Writ Petition No. 1474 of 2014 to Writ Petition No. 1487 of 2014, Writ Petition No. 2562 of 2014 to Writ Petition No. 2568 of 2014 (ABHAY M.THIPSAY, J)

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2201 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.378 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.379 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.380 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.381 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.382 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.383 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.384 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.385 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1739 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2202 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2203 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2204 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2205 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.373 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.376 OF 2014 Girishchandra Ugresan Sahoo Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.387 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.388 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.389 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.390 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.391 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.392 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.393 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.394 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.395 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.396 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.397 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1665 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1666 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1667 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1668 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1669 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1670 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2206 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2207 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2208 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2209 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2210 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2211 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2212 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2213 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2214 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2215 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1380 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.374 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.375 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.377 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1381 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1382 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1383 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1384 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1514 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1515 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1516 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1517 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1518 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1519 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1520 OF 2014 Shantanu Narayan Rooj & Anr. .. Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 538 OF 2014 Amit Prakash Jaste .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 834 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 836 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 837 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 838 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 839 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 840 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 841 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 842 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 843 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 844 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 845 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 846 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 847 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1474 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1475 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1476 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1477 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1478 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1479 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1480 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1481 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1482 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1483 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1484 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1485 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1486 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1487 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1494 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1495 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2562 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2563 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2564 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2565 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2566 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2567 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2568 OF 2014 Alok Sharma & Ors. Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. Respondents Mr.Prasad Kumar Das, Advocate for the Petitioners in W.P.No.2201 of 2014 & Group. …. Mrs. S.V. Gajare, A.P.P. for Respondent – State in W.P.No.2201 of 2014 & Group. Ms.Mrunmal Kulkarni, i/b. Mr.M.G. Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr.A.P. Mundargi, Senior Advocate for the Petitioners in W.P.No.1380 of 2014 & Group. Mr.Y.S. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent – State in W.P.No.1380 of 2014 & Group. Ms.Mrunmal Kulkarni, i/b. Mr.M.G. Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr.Rishi Bhuta i/b. A.S. Khan & Associates, Advocate for the Petitioners in APL No.538 of 2014 & Group. Mrs.M.R. Tidke, A.P.P. for Respondent – State in APL No.538 of 2014 & Group. Ms.Mrunmal Kulkarni, i/b. Mr.M.G. Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No.2. …. CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : DECEMBER 12, 2014. P.C. : The learned counsel for the respondent no.2 states that the respondent no.2 shall not proceed further in any of these matters in the Court of the Magistrate. 2 Stand over to 20th December, 2014. (ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.538 of 2014 rpa Amit Prakash Jaste Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr Respondents WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.834 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.835 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.836 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.837 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.838 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.839 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.840 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.841 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.842 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.843 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.844 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.845 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.846 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.847 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1475 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1476 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1477 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1478 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1479 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1480 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1481 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1482 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1483 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1484 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1485 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1486 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1487 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1494 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1495 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.2562 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.2563 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2564 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2565 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.2566 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2567 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.2568 of 2014 Alok Sharma and others .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr .. Respondents Mr.Rishi Bhuta i/b. M/s. A.S. Khan & Associates, Advocate for the Aplicant. Mr.M.D. Pareek i/b. Mr.M. G. Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mrs.M.R. Tidke, APP for the Respondent State. --- CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 20th DECEMBER, 2014. --- P.C. : On the prayer of learned counsel for the respondent no.2, stand over to 13th January, 2015, for final hearing. (ABHAY M.THIPSAY, J)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2414 OF 2024 Baban Undrya Kathara ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr. Aniket Vagal aw Mr. Sanket Bhavad aw Mr. Kunal Pednekar for Petitioner Mr. Pradip Rajput for Resp 2 Mr. Vinod Chate, APP for the State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI & HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE, JJ DATE : 18th June, 2024 P.C. : At the request of the learned APP for the Respondent - State, S.O. to 20/06/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.539 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.540 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.541 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.542 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.548 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.551 OF 2014 Amit Prakash Jaste .Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & anr. .Respondents Mr.Rishi Bhuta & Mr.Manish Bohra i/b. M/s.A.S.Khan & Associates, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.M.G.Shukla, Advocate, for the Respondent No.2 CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 11TH JULY, 2014 P.C. . Not on board. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. The proceedings are stayed until further orders qua the petitioner. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 9: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.556 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. Mı Mr. Vyas i/b Vyas And Bhalwal for Applicant. Mr. Rejas M. Bhatt for respondent no.2. Mr. Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for Respondent No.1-State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J. : 17th July 2015. DATE P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. Admit. Interim relief in terms of prayer clause (ii). (A.S. GADKARI, J.)