Tag: Charge Sheet Or Prosecution

Order - Status 5: SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2014 ...... Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ...Applicant Versus Lata Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant Applicant present in Court None for Respondent No.1 Ms. Usha Kejariwal, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State CORAM:- REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED :- JANUARY 31, 2014 ...... P.C. Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant. By this Application, the Applicant is challenging the order dated 5th December, 2013 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 52nd Court, Kurla, Mumbai, below Exhibit 4 in C. C. No. 189/Misc/2013, by which, her application came to be rejected, wherein she had challenged the locus standi of the Respondent No.1 to file an application under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The present Applicant is the daughter-in-law of the Respondent No.1. The Respondent No. 1 has filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, seeking reliefs under Sections 18, 21 and 22 of the said Act, and has also sought protection order apart from other reliefs. The learned Counsel for the Applicant has relied on a Judgment of the Delhi High Court in the case of Varsha Kapoor vs. Union of India & Ors. in Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 638 of 2010, in support of his contention that the term `respondent' as defined in Section 2(q), is restricted only to adult male persons while construing the expression, "a relative of the husband or the male partner." Issue notice to the respondent No.1, returnable on 11th February, 2014. Hamdust permitted. In addition to Court notice, Applicant to serve the respondent No.1 by Advocate's notice and file an affidavit of service before the returnable date. The learned Counsel for the Applicant, on the instructions of the Applicant, who is present in Court, states that she will not visit the house of respondent No.1 or create any nuisance or threaten the respondent No.1. Ad-interim stay in terms of prayer clause (c) till 12th February, 2014. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 7: SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2014 ...... ...... Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ...Applicant Versus Lata Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. ...Respondents Ms. Maya Upadeshe h/f Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant None for Respondent No.1 Ms. Usha Kejariwal, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State CORAM:- REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED :- FEBRUARY 12, 2014 P.C. On 31st January, 2014, notice was issued, which was made returnable on 11th February, 2014 and hamdust was permitted. However, despite the said order, the Advocate for the applicant has not supplied spare copy and hence, notice could not be issued. It is made clear that if the spare copy is not supplied within two days from today, the stay granted vide order dated 31st January, 2014 shall stand vacated. Stand over to 14th February, 2014. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 9: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani .Applicant V/s. Lata Srichand Sakhrani & anr. .Respondents None for the Applicant Mr.Tariq Khan, Advocate, for Respondent No.1 Mrs.U.V.Kejariwal, APP, for Respondent No.2 – State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 14TH FEBRUARY, 2014 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for respondent No.1. The learned counsel for the respondent No.1 states that he will file his Vakalatnama within one week from today. Stand over to 28-02-2014. Till then, interim relief granted vide order dated 31-01-2014 to continue. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 11: nsc. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.66 OF 2014 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office Notes, Memorandam of appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Office Court's or Judge's orders ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Mr.Laxman P. Kanal, for the applicant. Mr.Tariq Khan, for respondent no.1. Ms.U.V.Kejariwal, APP for the State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED : 28th February, 2014. P.C. 1. Learned Counsel for the Respondent No.1, states that he will file his reply in the Registry during the course of the day. He states that a copy of the reply has been served on the Counsel for the Applicant. On the next date, an endeavour shall be made to decide the matter finally at the stage of 2/2 18-apl.66.2014.doc admission. Stand over to 7th March, 2014. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 13: SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2014 ...... ...... Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ...Applicant Versus Lata Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant Mr. Tariq Khan for Respondent No.1 Ms. Usha Kejariwal, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State CORAM:- REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED :- MARCH 7, 2014 P.C. Heard Counsel for the parties. Arguable questions are raised. Admit. Mr. Khan waives service for respondent No.1. Ms. Kejariwal, A.P.P waives service for respondent No.2-State. To be listed in the 2nd week of April, 2014 at the end of the admision Board under caption `for final hearing and disposal'. There shall be an interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c). REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani .Applicant V/s. Lata Srichand Sakhrani & anr. .Respondents Mr.Laxman P. Kanal, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.Tariq Khan, Advocate, for Respondent No.1 Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP, for Respondent No.2 – State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 22ND APRIL, 2014 P.C. . By consent, stand over after vacation. Till then, interim relief granted earlier to continue. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 20: Osk 935-Apl-66-2014.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani … Applicant V/s. Laat Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. … Respondents Mr.Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant. Mr.S.S. Hulke, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 17th June 2022. P.C. : . At the request of learned Advocate for Applicant, stand over to 28th June 2022. [A.S. GADKARI, J.] OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Digitally signed by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date: 2022.06.20 13:04:16 +0530

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APL NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani …..Applicant Vs. Lata Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. …..Respondents Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for the Applicant. Mr. R.M. Pethe APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 1st JULY, 2022. P.C.:- None for the Respondent No.1. In order to grant an opportunity to the Respondent No.1, stand over to 15th July, 2022. To be listed on supplementary board. (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ....APPLICANT V/S Laat Srichand Sakhrani And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr.Laxman Kalel for the Applicant. Mr. Tariq Khan for the Respondent No.-1. Mr. R.M.Pethe, APP for the Respondent - State. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI J DATE : 15th July, 2022 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the Respondent , stand over to 22/07/2022 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ....APPLICANT V/S Laat Srichand Sakhrani And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant Mrs. J. S. Lohokare APP-for State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. G. SEWLIKAR J DATE : 22nd July, 2022 P.C. : S. O. to 29/07/2022 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 29: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ....APPLICANT V/S Laat Srichand Sakhrani And Anr ....RESPONDENT LAXMAN PRATABRAI KANAL A/W. DIVYA KANAL FOR APPLICANT YOGESH Y DABKE APP FOR STATE/RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL J DATE : 29th July, 2022 P.C. : The Registry to verify and place the matter before the appropriate Court. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2577 OF 2022 Geeta Dattatray Kamble and others … Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr. Akhilesh Jaiswal alongwith Mr. Asit Chaware for the Petitioners. Mrs. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the State. …...... …...... CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND N.R. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 1 AUGUST 2022 P.C. :- The learned Counsel for the Petitioners seeks to amend that is to place the typed/legible copy of the FIR on record and also to join the Complainant as party Respondent. Amendment to be carried out within period of one week from today. A copy of the amended Petition shall be served on the newly added Respondent. Stand over to 29 August 2022. ( N.R. BORKAR, J. ) ( NITIN JAMDAR, J. ) Date: 2022.08.02 18:10:23 +0530 Digitally signed by KANCHAN PRASHANT DHURI

Order - Status 6: 52.WP2577.2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2577 OF 2022 Geeta Dattatray Kamble & ors. ...Petitioners. Versus State of Maharashtra & anr. ...Respondents. Mr. Akhilesh Jaiswal a/w. Mr. Asit Chaware and Mr. Udaysinh Deshmukh & Mr. Aniket Ahire & Mr. Tanveer Patel, advocate for Petitioners. Ms. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & R.N. LADDHA, JJ. DATE : 15th NOVEMBER, 2022 P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Issue notice to the respondents. Learned APP waives notice on behalf of the respondent No.1–State and seeks time to take instructions. In addition to Court notice, petitioners to serve the respondent No.2, by private notice and file affidavit of service before the next date. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners to supply spare copies in the Registry within two week from today, so as to enable the registry to issue notice to the respondent No.2, failing which, the aforesaid Petition shall stand dismissed, for want of prosecution. If the spare copy is supplied within the stipulated time, notice be made returnable on 19th December, 2022. Hamdast permitted. Having heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioners, in the meantime, till the next date, investigation to continue, however, charge-sheet not to be filed against the petitioners. R.N. LADDHA, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2577 OF 2022 Geeta Dattatray Kamble And Anr PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE JUSTICE REVATI MOHITE DERE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ DATE : 19th December, 2022 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 15/02/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2577 OF 2022 Geeta Dattatray Kamble And Anr PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE JUSTICE REVATI MOHITE DERE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. DIGE, JJ DATE : 15th February, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 26/04/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2577 OF 2022 Geeta Dattatray Kamble And Anr PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Ms.Siddhi Sawant i/b. Gaurav Parkar for Petitioner Smt.M.H.Mhatre APP for Respondent/State Mr.Amit Icham i/b. Asif Chaware for R.No.2 CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK, JJ DATE : 18th February, 2025 P.C. : At the request of the learned Counsel for the Appellant(s)/ Applicant(s) / Petitioner(s) / Respondent No. stand over to 11/03/2025. Ad-interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM:- SARANG V. KOTWAL & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATE:- 11th March,2025 P.C. :- As the Court time is over, the balance board could not be taken up. Matter stand over to the dates mentioned in the chart below. Serial number of matter on board To be listed on Sr. No. 27, 30 to 36, 38 to 44 11/06/2025 Sr. No. 47 to 60 13/06/2025 Sr. No. 61 to 75 16/06/2025 Sr. No. 76 to 78, 80 to 90 17/06/2025 Sr. No. 91 to 103, 105 to 115 18/06/2025 Sr.No. 116,117,120, 123 to 125 19/06/2025 Sr. No. 126 to 140 20/06/2025 Sr. No. 141 to 150, 152, 153 23/06/2025 Ad-interim order,if any, to continue till the next date. (S.M. MODAK, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL,J.) Deshmane

Order - Status 16: GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Digitally signed by GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Date: 2025.06.18 12:34:20 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 13th JUNE, 2025. P.C. :- At the time of rising, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks. Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue. The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date. Subject to the above, list these matters as under:- Serial Nos. of matters on the Board To be listed on To be listed in the category 2 to 4 24/06/2025 Fresh Admission 6 to 22 24/06/2025 Fresh Admission 24 and 25 24/06/2025 Fresh Admission 26 to 31 25/06/2025 Fresh Admission 33 to 58 25/06/2025 Fresh Admission 60 08/07/2025 Urgent Admission 61 to 71 16/07/2025 Urgent Orders Gauri Gaekwad 2 common order 13.06.2025 72 to 75 17/07/2025 Due Admission 79 17/07/2025 Due Admission 80 to 88 08/07/2025 Final Hearing (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 545 OF 2019 Nenshi Ladhabhai Shah And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent CORAM : RANJIT MORE. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, JJ DATE : 30th July, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to as per CMIS date. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 545 OF 2019 Nenshi Ladhabhai Shah And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent Karan L Jain For Applicant Ms.S.D.Shinde- APP for the State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE. & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATE : 27th August, 2019 P.C. : Stand over to as per CMIS date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )