All Cases

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 15188 OF 2023 In Civil Revision Application STAMP NO. 13049 OF 2023 Manohar Sonu Talekar ....PETITIONER V/S The Sub Divisional Officer, Kankavali Division....RESPONDENT Mr. N. V. Bandiwadekar Senior Advocate i/by Ashwini Bandiwadekar for Applicant Ms. Shilpa G. Talhar, AGP for State-Respondent No. 1 and 3 CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE J DATE : 5th May, 2025 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the AGP. Stand over to 18/06/2025.,Interim relief, if any, to continue till the next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 15188 OF 2023 In Civil Revision Application STAMP NO. 13049 OF 2023 Manohar Sonu Talekar ....PETITIONER V/S The Sub Divisional Officer, Kankavali Division....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV J DATE : 18th June, 2025 P.C. : S. O. to 25/06/2025 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.G. / CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : JUNE 25, 2025 P.C . : 1. Due to paucity of time, the following matters are adjourned to future dates follows:- Serial Nos. Adjourned date 35 to 70 20th August, 2025 71 to 106 21st August, 2025 107 to 124 and 126 to 142 25th August, 2025 143 to 152 26th August, 2025 2. In the meanwhile, ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier to continue. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Digitally signed by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date: 2025.06.25 18:24:29 +0530

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.4652 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, am, Court's or Judgo's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Mr.C.G.Gavnekar for the petitioner. Ms M.P.Thakur, A.G.P. for resp. nos.1 & 2. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & A.R.JOSHI,JJ. DATE : JUNE 27, 2011. P.C.: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice, returnable on 11.7.2011. The learned Asstt. Govt. Pleader waives notice on behalf of the respondent nos.1 & 2. (D.D. SINHA, J.) (A.R. JOSHI, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4652 OF 2011 Subhash Prabhakar Patil ..Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. C. G. Gavnekar for Petitioner. Mr. P. M. Palshikar - 'A' Panel Counsel and Mrs. M. P. Thakur - Assistant Government Pleader for Respondents. CORAM : D. D. SINHA & A. R. JOSHI, JJ. 27 July 2011. P.C. : Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to amend the year of The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Presiding Authorities) (Removal From Office Due to Misconduct) Rules. It is submitted that inadvertently it is mentioned in the petition that those Rules are of 1994 whereas they are of the year 1995. Leave granted. Appropriate amendment be carried out forthwith. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents. Rule. Learned counsel for the respondents waives service on behalf of the Respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the present petition the petitioner has raised challenge to the validity of sub rule 6 of rule 3 of The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Presiding Authorities) (Removal from Office Due to Misconduct) Rules 1995. Sub rule 6 reads thus : "On the date fixed for the inquiry, the oral and documentary evidence shall be produced by or on behalf of the complainant. The witnesses shall be examined by or on behalf of the complainant and may be crossexamined by the Presiding authority against whom there are charges of misconduct. However no legal practitioner shall be allowed to appear on behalf of the complainant or the Presiding authority." The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that Section 50 of The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 deals with removal of President or a Vice-President. The petitioner is a President of Raigad Zilla Parishad and the proceedings are initiated against him on the ground of misconduct in discharge of his duties and therefore the procedure which the respondents need to follow is stipulated in Section 50 of the Act. It is contended that proviso to Section 50 contemplates that no President or Vice-President shall be removed from office unless he has been given a reasonable opportunity to furnish an explanation. It is further contended that Section 274 of the Act gives powers to the State Government to make rules, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Act, for the purpose of carrying in to effect the provisions of the Act. It is contended that sub section (2) also empowers the State Government to make rules for all or any of the following matters which are mentioned in sub section (2). It is submitted that Section 274(2) does not clothe State Government to make rule regarding removal of President or Vice President as stipulated in section 50 of the Act nor the State Government is competent to make rule inconsistent with the provisions of section 50 as per sub rule 1 and section 274 of the Act. The counsel for the petitioner therefore contended that to comply with the doctrine of natural justice as contemplated by provisions of section 50 before a President or Vice-President is removed from the office, the request made by the petitioner to permit him to be represented by lawyer at the time of inquiry is just, proper and is consistent with the provisions of Section 50. The learned counsel for the respondents on the other hand has submitted that the State Government has a power to make rules in view of provisions of section 274 sub sections (1) and (2). It is contended that sub clause (li) gives power to make rules in respect of any other matter under the Act and therefore the State Government is clothe with power to make rules even in respect of contingencies mentioned in section 50 of the Act. Sub rule 6 of rule 3 only prohibits legal practitioner to appear on behalf of the complainant or the presiding authority in the inquiry proceedings undertaken for removal of President or a Vice President as per procedure stipulated under section 50 of the Act, however petitioner will be given full opportunity to participate in the inquiry. It is therefore contended that the challenge raised by the petitioner to sub rule 6 of rule 3 is misconceived and bad in law. We have considered the rival contentions and also considered the relevant rules relied on and cited by the learned respective counsel for the parties. The questions which fall for our consideration are as follows: i. Whether the State Government is clothed with the power to make rules under Section 274(2) pertaining to contingencies stipulated in section 50 of the Act which deals with removal of a President or a Vice President? ii. Proviso 1 to section 50 contemplates that no President or a Vice President shall be removed from the office unless he has been given reasonable opportunity to furnish an explanation and therefore whether the concept of reasonable opportunity to furnish explanation includes such person can be represented by lawyer at the time of such inquiry or proceedings. iii. Even if it is presumed for the sake of argument that the State Government may have a power in respect of the contingency as mentioned in section 50 of the Act, even then whether the State Government can make a rule inconsistent with the provisions of section 50 of the Act such as sub rule 6 of rule 3 of the Rules, which prohibits President or Vice President being represented by lawyer in such inquiry proceedings, whereas section 50 of the Act does not stipulate such prohibition. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the circumstances the interim relief in terms of prayer clause (f) may kindly be granted during the pendency of the petition. The learned counsel for the respondents opposed the prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner. Considered the rival contentions for grant of interim relief and perused the relevant provisions of the Act and the Rules. Taking the over all view of the matter, though it is not possible to give findings on the issues involved in the present case at this stage, however, we are prima facie of the view that the case is made out for grant of interim relief. If the interim relief is not granted and if the inquiry commenced against the petitioner is permitted to go on the petition will become infructuous. Therefore we grant interim relief in terms of prayer clause (f) of the petition during the pendency of the petition. Considering the issue involved, respective counsel prayed that the hearing of the petition may be expedited. In the circumstances, hearing of the petition is expedited. (D. D. SINHA, J.) (A. R. JOSHI, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.958 OF 2019 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO.14442 OF 2019 …. Mrs. Seema S. Ingavle ...Applicant Versus Sanja V. Ingavle ...Respondent Ms Diya Jadhav I/b. Mr. Suryajeet P. Chavan for the Applicant. None for the Respondent. CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED : 30th JULY, 2019. P.C.: Issue notice to the Respondent, returnable on 13/8/2019. Private service is permitted. (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) Megha Parab Digitally signed by Megha Parab Date: 2019.07.31 12:03:39 +0530

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 958 OF 2019 In SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 14442 OF 2019 Mrs. Seema S Ingavle ....Applicant V/S Shri. Sanja V. Ingavle ....Respondent None For Applicant Mr. A. B. Tajane i.b. Mr. P D Pise Filed Vp For Sole Respondent In Sast CORAM : RAJESH G. KETKAR, J DATE : 13th August, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the respondent, Stand over to 27/08/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 958 OF 2019 In SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 14442 OF 2019 Mrs. Seema S Ingavle Applicant V/S Shri. Sanja V. Ingavle Respondent Mr Suryajeet Prithviraj Chavan For Applicant None for Respondent CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J DATE : 27th August, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the Applicant, Stand Over to 17/09/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 958 OF 2019 In SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 14442 OF 2019 Mrs. Seema S Ingavle ....Applicant V/S Shri. Sanja V. Ingavle ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J DATE : 17th September, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 04/10/2019 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 958 OF 2019 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST.) NO. 14442 OF 2019 Mrs. Seema S. Ingavle ….Applicant V/s. Sanja V. Ingavle ….Respondent Mr. Satyajeet R. Chavan for the applicant. Mr. P.D. Pise for the respondent. CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED : 04th OCTOBER, 2019 P.C.:- . Affidavit-in-reply, if any, to be filed in the registry within a period of four weeks with copy to the other side in advance. Stand over to 11/11/2019. Preeti H. Jayani Digitally signed by Preeti H. Jayani Date: 2019.10.10 11:34:46 +0530 (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 958 OF 2019 In SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 14442 OF 2019 Mrs. Seema S Ingavle ....APPLICANT V/S Shri. Sanja V. Ingavle ....RESPONDENT None for Applicant / Appellant Mr. P. D. Pise Adv. for Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J DATE : 20th January, 2022 P.C. : S. O. to 17/02/2022 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 16: 21 CAS-958-2019.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 958 OF 2019 IN / WITH SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 14442 OF 2019 Mrs. Seema S Ingavle …Applicant/ …Appellant Versus Shri. Sanja V. Ingavle …Respondent ***** Mr. Suryajeet P. Chavan, for Applicant. Mr. Padmanabh D. Pise, for sole Respondent. ***** CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J. DATE : 13th FEBRUARY 2024 P.C. : . Heard learned counsel for the parties. HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF Digitally signed by HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF Date: 2024.02.15 10:12:47 +0530 This is an application for condonation of delay of 123 days in filing above appeal. The matter is arising out of matrimonial dispute between the Applicant/wife and Respondent/husband. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that if the matter is referred to a Mediator, sincere efforts can be made to bring an end to the dispute. It is jointly submitted that there is good possibility of settlement. Considering the nature of the dispute, as suggested by the parties, they are referred to Advocate Shri. S.G. Deshmukh, Room No. 36, Appellate Side Bar room, High Court, Mumbai, for mediation in the matter. Parties agree to meet the said mediator on 20/02/2024 as a first meeting. The said Mediator is requested to mediate the matter and submit his report, preferably within 8 weeks. The Mediator is free to decide the time table and both the learned counsel for the parties assure that the parties would co-operate. The aspect of mediation charges is kept open to be decided by the learned Mediator. Stand over to 15/04/2024. (M.M. SATHAYE, J.)

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 958 OF 2019 In SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 14442 OF 2019 Mrs. Seema S Ingavle ....APPLICANT V/S Shri. Sanja V. Ingavle ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE J DATE : 25th July, 2024 P.C. : Listed for assigning date.Stand Over to 01/10/2024 under the caption for Urgent Orders. If any ad-interim / interim relief is operating till today, the same shall continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/ interim relief is granted not for a limited period, the same shall remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 20: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 958 OF 2019 In SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 14442 OF 2019 Mrs. Seema S Ingavle ....APPLICANT V/S Shri. Sanja V. Ingavle ....RESPONDENT Ms. Vishakha Shelar h/f Mr. Suryajeet P. Chavan for Applicant. Mr. Padmanabh D. Pise for Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE J DATE : 1st October, 2024 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the Applicant , stand over to 03/01/2025 as a Last Chance. If any ad-interim / interim relief is operating till today, the same shall continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/ interim relief is granted not for a limited period, the same shall remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 958 OF 2019 In Second Appeal STAMP NO. 14442 OF 2019 Mrs. Seema S Ingavle ....APPLICANT V/S Shri. Sanja V. Ingavle ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE J DATE : 3rd January, 2025 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time.Stand Over to 24/03/2025 If any ad-interim / interim relief is operating till today, the same shall continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/ interim relief is granted not for a limited period, the same shall remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 958 OF 2019 In SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 14442 OF 2019 Mrs. Seema S Ingavle ....APPLICANT V/S Shri. Sanja V. Ingavle ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE J DATE : 24th March, 2025 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand Over to 09/09/2025. If any ad-interim / interim relief is operating till today, the same shall continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/ interim relief is granted not for a limited period, the same shall remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 3: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 4: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 5: Dusane 1/1 wp7053.2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7053 OF 2016 M/s A.V. Bhat Housing Company .... Petitioner Vs. Sarita Nagari PhaseII Coop. Housing .... Respondent Society Ltd. & Ors. Mr. P.S. Dani, Senior Counsel i/by Mr. Prasad B. Kulkarni, for the Petitioner. Mr. S.D. Rayrikar, AGP for Respondents no. 5 and 6. Coram : Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. Date : 29th June, 2016 P.C. 1 Issue notice to the respondents returnable on 25th July, 2016. Adinterim relief in terms of prayer clause (b), till the returnable date. S.O. to 25th July, 2016. (Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J)

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7053 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders None present. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDLI) Date : 25 JULY 2016 Await service to Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 for five weeks i.e. 30.08.2016. REGISTRAR (JUDLI) RJ I gpj / 25.07.2016

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7053 OF 2016 M/s. A.V. Bhat Housing Company …..Petitioner V/s. Sarita Nagari Phase-II Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., and Ors. …..Respondents * * * * * * Mr. Prasad B. Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM :- SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED :- 25TH JULY, 2016. P.C. :- 1). Mentioned. Not on board. The papers are produced at the instance of the petitioner for extension of the ad-interim reliefs which expire today. The ad-interim order is extended by 4 weeks from today i.e. till 22nd August, 2016. (SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J)

Order - Status 11: 16-wp-7053-2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7053 OF 2016 M/s.A.V. Bhat Housing Company Through Partner Sameer S. Belvalkar ...Petitioner V/s. Sarita Nagari PhaseII, Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.Prasad B. Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr.Mihir Raut i/by Mr.Nitin Deshpande for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.D. Rayrikar, AGP for Respondent Nos.5 & 6. CORAM : K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 14th OCTOBER, 2016. P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that Respondent Nos.1 to 4 have filed their affidavitinreply. Hence, service is completed. Office is directed to verify the same and if service is completed for all the respondents, matter to appear on board under the caption of "Admission' on 17th November 2016. Adinterim granted by this Court on 29th June 2016 to continue till the next date. (K.K. TATED, J.)

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7053 OF 2016 M/s. A.v. Bhat Housing Company Through Partner Sameer S. Belvalkar ....Petitioner V/S Sarita Nagari Phase - Ii, Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. And Ors. ....Respondent Mr. Prasad B Kulkarni, for Petitioner. Mr. Mihir Raut, i/b. Mr. N.P. Deshpande, for R.Nos.1 & 2. Mr. S.D.Rayrikar, AGP, for R.Nos. 5 & 6. CORAM : R.M. SAVANT., J DATE : 17th November, 2016 P.C. : S.O. to 1st December 2016. Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue until then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7053 OF 2016 M/s. A V Bhat Housing Compnay Through Partner Sameer S Belvalkar : Petitioner. versus Sarita Nagari Phase – II Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. & ors. : Respondents. Mr. P B Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr. S D Rayrikar AGP for the Respondent Nos.5 and 6. CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 01st December 2016 P.C. 1 Not on board. Mentioned for continuation of adinterim reliefs. 2 The above Petition was to be listed before this Court today however, the same is wrongly listed before another Court i.e. the Court of K.K.Tated, J. An application is therefore made for continuation of adinterim reliefs. The adinterim relief would accordingly continue up to 20/12/2016. List the above Petition for admission on 19/12/2016. [R.M.SAVANT, J]

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7053 OF 2016 M/s. A V Bhat Housing Compnay Through Partner Sameer S Belvalkar : Petitioner. versus Sarita Nagari Phase – II Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. & ors. : Respondents. Mr. P B Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr. S D Rayrikar AGP for the Respondent Nos.5 and 6. CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 01st December 2016 P.C. 1 Not on board. Mentioned for continuation of adinterim reliefs. 2 The above Petition was to be listed before this Court today however, the same is wrongly listed before another Court i.e. the Court of K.K.Tated, J. An application is therefore made for continuation of adinterim reliefs. The adinterim relief would accordingly continue up to 20/12/2016. List the above Petition for admission on 19/12/2016. [R.M.SAVANT, J]

Order - Status 18: wp705316(production) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7053 OF 2016 M/s A. V. Bhat Housing Company through partner Sameer Belvalkar ..Petitioner Vs. Sarita Nagari Phase – II, Coop Hsg Sty & Ors ..Respondents Mr. Ganesh Bhujbal i/b Mr. P. B. Kulkarni for the Petitioner Mr. N. P. Deshpande for the Respondent No.1 Mr. S. D. Rayrikar AGP for the Respondent Nos.5 and 6 CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 20th DECEMBER, 2016 P.C. 1 Not on board. Mentioned for continuation of the adinterim relief. 2 The above Petition was to be listed yesterday i.e. 19122016 but has not been so listed. Adinterim relief is continued up to 2412017. List the Petition for admission on 2312017. [R.M.SAVANT, J]

Order - Status 20: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7053 OF 2016 M/s. A. V. Bhat Housing Company Presently M/s. Belvalkar Housing Company, Registered Partnership Firm Having office at 1175/1, Nirmiti Eminence, Erandwane, Pune4 Through partner, Sameer Sharatchandra Belvalkar ..Petitioner Versus Sarita Nagari PhaseII, Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., Survey No.110/1, Parvati, Pune411 009, Through its Chairman, S. M. Oak and others ..Respondents Mr. P. B. Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr. Mihir Raut i/by Mr. N. P. Deshpande for the Respondent No.1. Mr. S. D. Rayrikar, AGP for the Respondent Nos.5 & 6. CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 23rd JANUARY, 2017 P.C. 1 Not on board. Mentioned for continuation of the adinterim relief. 2 The above Petition was to be listed today, but has not been so listed. The adinterim relief is continued upto 14.02.2017. List the Petition for admission on 13.02.2017. [R.M.SAVANT, J]

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7053 OF 2016 M/s. A. V. Bhat Housing Company Presently M/s. Belvalkar Housing Company, Registered Partnership Firm Having office at 1175/1, Nirmiti Eminence, Erandwane, Pune4 Through partner, Sameer Sharatchandra Belvalkar ..Petitioner Versus Sarita Nagari PhaseII, Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., Survey No.110/1, Parvati, Pune411 009, Through its Chairman, S. M. Oak and others ..Respondents Mr. P. B. Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr. N. P. Deshpande for the Respondent No.1. Mr. S. D. Rayrikar, AGP for the Respondent Nos.5 & 6. CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 14th FEBRUARY, 2017 P.C. 1 Not on board. Mentioned for continuation of the adinterim relief. 2 The above Petition was to be listed yesterday, but has not been so listed. The adinterim relief is therefore continued upto 02.03.2017. List the Petition for admission on 01.03.2017. [R.M.SAVANT, J]

Order - Status 24: wp705316(production) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7053 OF 2016 M/s. A. V. Bhat Housing Company through partner Sameer Belvalkar ..Petitioner Vs. Sarita Nagari Phase – II, Cooperative Housing Society Ltd & Ors ..Respondents Mr. P. B. Kulkarni for the Petitioner Mr. N. P. Deshpande for the Respondent No.1 Mr. S. D. Rayrikar AGP for the Respondent Nos.5 & 6 CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 2 nd MARCH, 2017 P.C. 1 Not on board. Mentioned for continuation of the adinterim relief. 2 The above Petition was to be listed for admission on 132017 but was not been so listed. Hence list the Petition for admission on 2232017. Adinterim relief is to operate till today. Hence adinterim relief to continue up to 2332017. [R.M.SAVANT, J]

Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7053 OF 2016 M/s. A.v. Bhat Housing Company Through Partner Sameer S. Belvalkar ....Petitioner V/S Sarita Nagari Phase - Ii, Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. And Ors. ....Respondent CORAM : R.M. SAVANT., J DATE : 22nd March, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 15/06/2017.Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 28: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7053 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr.Raghuvendra B. Kulkarni i/b Mr.P.B.Kulkarni for the Petitioner Mrs.Vaishali Nimbalkar, A.G.P. for the respondent nos.5 and 6 CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : JUNE 16, 2017 P.C.: 1 Not on board. At the request of Advocate for the petitioner, matter is taken on board for continuation of adinterim relief granted on 29.6.2016. 2 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 3 Advocate for the petitioner submits that as per order dated 22.3.2017, matter was to be listed on board on 15.6.2017 but same was not shown on board. Hence, he has mentioned this matter. 4 Considering these facts, office is directed to place the matter on board on 1.8.2017. 5 Till that time, adinterim relief granted on 29.6.2016 to continue. (K.K.TATED, J.)

Order - Status 30: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7053 OF 2016 M/s. A. V. Bhat Housing Company ..Vs.. Sarita Nagari PhaseII Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. & Ors. Office Notes, Office Memorandam of appearances, Court's orders or directions & Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders. Mr. Prasad B. Kulkarni for Petitioner. Mr. N. P. Deshpande for Respondent No.1. Mrs. V. S. Nimbalkar, AGP for Respondent Nos.5 and 6. CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : AUGUST 01, 2017. P.C. : . The learned Counsel Mr. Kulkarni for Petitioner submit that his arguing Counsel is not available today. Hence, he require some time. On his request, office is directed to place the matter on board on 16th August, 2017. Adinterim order to continue till next date. (K.K.TATED, J.)

Order - Status 32: 1 /1wp-7053-16-501 Nalawade IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7053 OF 2016 M/s. A.V. Bhat Housing Company. ..Petitioner. vs. Sarita Nagari Phase II Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. and ors. ..Respondents. Mr. P.B.Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr. Nitin Deshpande for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.D.Rayrikar for Respondent Nos. 5 and 6. CORAM: A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 16th August, 2017 P.C. S.O. to 12.9.2017. Ad-interim relief to continue till the next date. (A.S.GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 34: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 7053 OF 2016 M/s. A. V. Bhat Housing Company … Petitioner Vs. Sarita Nagari Phase-II, Co-Op. Housing Society Ltd. & Ors. … Respondents *** Mr. P. S. Dani, Sr. Counsel i/b P. B. Kulkarni, for the Petitioner. Mr. S. D. Rayarikar, AGP for Respondent Nos. 5 and 6. *** CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 PC : Not on board. In view of urgency, matter is listed today on the production board. Since the learned counsel for Respondent No. 1 is not present, place the matter for further consideration on 11.10.2017. An ad-interim order, which is already in force, to continue till next date. However, Respondent No. 1 is at liberty to file reply to the petition inter alia indicating the position of registration of Respondent No. 1 Society. Sd/- [M. S. SONAK, J.]

Order - Status 36: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7053 OF 2016 M/s. A. V. Bhat Housing Company .. Petitioner. v/s. Sarita Nagari PhaseII, Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., & Others .. Respondents. Mr. Prasad B. Kulkarni, for the Petitioner. Ms. Chaitali Kale i/b. N. P. Deshpande, for Respondent No.1. Mr. S.D. Rayrikar, AGP, for Respondent Nos.5 & 6. CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA, J. DATE : 11th OCTOBER, 2017. P.C: Moved for urgent reliefs. By an order dated 13th September, 2017, this Petition was adjourned to today and adinterim relief granted earlier, was continued till today. However, Petition is not listed on board, today. 2 In the above view, adinterim relief granted earlier to continue till the CMIS date i.e. 11th December, 2017 when the Petition will be considered for admission. Stand over to 11th December, 2017. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)

Order - Status 38: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7053 OF 2016 1/1 M/s.A.V.Bhat Housing Company, presently M/s.Belvalkar Housing Company ….. Petitioner VERSUS Sarita Nagari Phase – II, Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. & Ors. ..… Respondents Mr.Prasad B.Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr.S.D.Rayrikar, A.G.P. for the State, Respondent no. 5 and 6. CORAM : R.D.DHANUKA, J. DATE : 11th DECEMBER, 2017 P.C . The papers are produced at 03.00 p.m. in view of the extreme urgency. Place the matter on board for admission on 8 th January,2018 . Ad-interim relief granted by this Court earlier to continue till 11th January,2018. The petitioner is directed to convey this order to the contesting respondents. (R.D.DHANUKA, J.)

Order - Status 40: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7053 OF 2016 M/s.A.V. Bhat Housing Company, presently M/s.Belvalkar Housing Company .. Petitioner Vs. Sarita Nagari Phase-II, Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents --- Mr.Prasad B. Kulkarni for the petitioner. Mr.Mihir Raut i/by Mr.Nitin P.Deshpande for the respondents. --- CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATE : 12th January 2018 P.C.: . Matter is mentioned not on board. Place the writ petition on board for 'Admission' on 26th February 2018. Ad-interim protection granted by this Court to continue till next date. R.D. DHANUKA, J.

Order - Status 42: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7053 OF 2016 M/s.A.V. Bhat Housing Co. ...Petitioner V/s. Sarita Nagari Phase-II Co-op.Hsg.Soc.Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Prasad B. Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr.Nitin P. Deshpande for the Respondent No.1. Mr.A.R. Matkari, A.G.P. for the State - Respondent Nos.5 and 6. CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATE : 26TH FEBRUARY, 2018. P.C. :- Stand over to 12th March, 2018. Ad-interim order to continue till next date. (R.D. DHANUKA, J.)

Order - Status 44: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7053 OF 2016 M/s. A.v. Bhat Housing Company Through Partner Sameer S. Belvalkar ....Petitioner V/S Sarita Nagari Phase - Ii, Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. And Ors. ....Respondent CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J DATE : 12th March, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time Stand Over to 26/03/2018. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 46: mujahed IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7053 OF 2016 M/s. A.V. Bhat Housing Company ...Petitioner V/s. Sarita Nagari Phase-II Co-operative Housing Society Ltd & Ors ...Respondents Mr. Prasad B. Kulkarni for Petitioner. Mr. S.D. Rayrikar, AGP for State/Respondent Nos. 5 & 6. CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATE : 27TH MARCH, 2018. P.C. :- Papers are allowed to be produced at 03.00 p.m. Place the writ petition on board for admission on 16th April, Ad-interim relief granted by this Court to continue till next date. (R.D. DHANUKA, J.)

Order - Status 48: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7053 OF 2016 M/s. A.v. Bhat Housing Company Through Partner Sameer S. Belvalkar ....Petitioner V/S Sarita Nagari Phase - Ii, Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. And Ors. ....Respondent CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J DATE : 16th April, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time Stand Over to 26/06/2018. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 50: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7053 OF 2016 M/s.A.V. Bhat Housing Company .. Petitioner Vs. Sarita Nagari Phase-II Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents --- Mr.P.D. Kulkarni for the petitioner. Mr.Mihir Raut i/by Mr.Nitin Deshpande for the respondent no.1. Mr.S.D.Rayrikar, AGP for the respondent nos.5 & 6. CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATE : 26th June 2018 P.C.: . Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the matter arising out of de-registration of the respondent no.1-Society is pending before the Supreme Court. Supreme Court has granted stay of the impugned order passed by this Court and has directed the parties to maintain status-quo as it exists on the date of the said order. He submits that the said proceedings will have some bearing on the subject matter of this petition. Statement is accepted. This petition is adjourned sine die with liberty to both the parties to apply for early hearing upon disposal of the said proceedings. Ad-interim relief granted by this Court to continue till next date. R.D. DHANUKA, J.

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 680 OF 2024 Alka @ Laxmi Ganpat Vinchu & Anr. …..Applicants Vs. The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents Mr. Priyal Sarda for the Applicants. Mr. A.I. Satpute APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 4 th JULY, 2024. P.C.:- Issue notice to Respondent No.2 returnable on 16th August, 2024. Learned Advocate for the Applicants is directed to supply spare copies of Application in the Registry within a period of one week from today, failing which the Application shall stand dismissed without further reference to this Court. Learned Advocate for the Applicants submitted that, perusal of FIR would indicate that, the allegations against the Applicants are very general in nature. That, the Respondent No. 2 has lodged the said crime after 27 years of marriage, implicating all the family members. In view thereof, till the returnable date, ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b). ( DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 680 OF 2024 Alka @ Laxmi Ganpat Vinchu and anr. … Applicants V/s. State of Maharashtra and anr. … Respondents Ms.Seema Dighe h/f Adv. Priyal Sarda, for Applicant. Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, A.P.P. for Respondent-State. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : st 21 August 2024. P.C. : Await service of Respondent No.2. Stand over to 25th September 2024. Ad-interim relief, if any granted earlier, to continue till then. ( DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. ) URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Digitally signed by URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Date: 2024.08.27 11:35:52 +0530

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 680 OF 2024 Alka @ Laxmi Ganpat Vinchu & Anr. …..Applicants Vs. The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents Adv. Seema S. Dighe i/by Adv. Priyal G. Sarda for the Applicants. Mr. Ashish I. Satpute APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 26 th SEPTEMBER, 2024. P.C.:- Await service of Respondent No.2. Stand over to 21st November, 2024. Ad-interim relief, if any granted earlier, to continue till the next date. ( DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR Date: 2024.10.01 13:41:57 +0530

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 680 OF 2024 Alka @ Laxmi Ganpat Vinchu And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK & HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE, JJ DATE : 21st November, 2024 P.C. : As the Court time is over, Stand Over to 08/01/2025 Ad-interim order, if any, to continue till the next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: 10:12:24 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATE :- 21st JANUARY, 2025 P.C. :- KVM At the time of rising at 5.15 p.m., the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks. Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue. The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date. Subject to the above, list these matters as under:- Serial Nos. of matters on the Board To be listed on To be listed in the category 31 to 40 04.02.2025 Fresh Admission 41 to 50 05.02.2025 Fresh Admission 52 to 58 06.02.2025 Fresh Admission 59 to 69 12.02.2025 Urgent Admission 70 to 76 13.02.2025 Urgent Admission 77 to 79 06.02.2025 Urgent Orders 80 to 100 25.02.2025 Due Admission 101 to 123 26.02.2025 Due Admission KVM (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 680 OF 2024 Alka @ Laxmi Ganpat Vinchu And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT PRIYAL G SARDA CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK, JJ DATE : 12th February, 2025 P.C. : As the Court time is over,Stand Over to 03/04/2025 Ad-interim order,if any, to continue till the next date ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM:- SARANG V. KOTWAL & S.M.MODAK, JJ. DATE:- 03rd April,2025 P.C. :- As the Court time is over, the balance board could not be taken up. Matter stand over to the dates mentioned in the chart below. Serial number of matter on board To be listed on Sr. No. 31 to 37, 39 to 40, 42 to 45 04/07/2025 Sr. No. 47 to 52, 54 to 57 07/07/2025 Sr. No. 59, 61 to 75 08/07/2025 Sr. No. 76 to 89, 91 to 95 09/07/2025 Sr. No.96,97,99,101 to 104 & 106 10/07/2025 Sr. No.108 to 115, 118 to 120, 123 & 125 11/07/2025 Sr. No. 126 to 133, 135 to 138 & 140 14/07/2025 Sr. No. 141 to 144, 146 to 158 15/07/2025 Ad-interim order,if any, to continue till the next date. (S.M.MODAK, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Seema .