All Cases

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5974 of 2007 M/s.Awate constructions. .. Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.B.G. Tangsali for the petitioner. CORAM : S.B. MHASE AND D.G.KARNIK, JJ DATED : 17th August 2007. P.C.: ... . Heard. This petition is similar to the disposed of petitions. viz. writ petition nos.6086 of 2005 and 3126 of 2006. In the said petitions, this Court has directed :- "In these circumstances, this petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to deposit in the Chief Minister's Relief Fund an amount of Rs.20,000/-. The petitioner shall deposit this amount with the 2nd respondent who shall, forward the amount to the Chief Minister's Relief Fund. The petitioner shall file an undertaking before the 2nd respondent that the vehicle shall not, hereafter, be plied within the municipal limits of the Greater Mumbai. The 2nd respondent shall subject to compliance with the aforesaid conditions release the vehicle only for one journey within the municipal limits of the Greater Mumbai so as to enable the petitioner to take the vehicle outside the municipal limits." In our opinion, this petition also can be disposed of by accepting the request of the petitioner for depositing an amount of Rs.30,000/- (Rs.Thirty Thousand only) in the Chief Minister's Relief Fund, and on deposit of such amount, the petitioner shall also file an undertaking before the respondent no.2 that the vehicle shall not be plied within the municipal limits of the Greater Mumbai. The respondent no.2 is directed to comply with this order and release the vehicle only for one journey within the municipal limits of the greater Mumbai so as to enable the petitioner to take the vehicle outside the municipal limits. This order has been passed in respect of vehicle bearing no. MH-04-E-4186.

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5973 of 2007 M/s.Awate constructions. .. Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.B.G. Tangsali for the petitioner. CORAM : S.B. MHASE AND D.G.KARNIK, JJ DATED : 17th August 2007. P.C.: ... . Heard. This petition is similar to the disposed of petitions. viz. writ petition nos.6086 of 2005 and 3126 of 2006. In the said petitions, this Court has directed :- "In these circumstances, this petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to deposit in the Chief Minister's Relief Fund an amount of Rs.20,000/-. The petitioner shall deposit this amount with the 2nd respondent who shall, forward the amount to the Chief Minister's Relief Fund. The petitioner shall file an undertaking before the 2nd respondent that the vehicle shall not, hereafter, be plied within the municipal limits of the Greater Mumbai. The 2nd respondent shall subject to compliance with the aforesaid conditions release the vehicle only for one journey within the municipal limits of the Greater Mumbai so as to enable the petitioner to take the vehicle outside the municipal limits." In our opinion, this petition also can be disposed of by accepting the request of the petitioner for depositing an amount of Rs.30,000/- (Rs.Thirty Thousand only) in the Chief Minister's Relief Fund, and on deposit of such amount, the petitioner shall also file an undertaking before the respondent no.2 that the vehicle shall not be plied within the municipal limits of the Greater Mumbai. The respondent no.2 is directed to comply with this order and release the vehicle only for one journey within the municipal limits of the greater Mumbai so as to enable the petitioner to take the vehicle outside the municipal limits. This order has been passed in respect of vehicle bearing no. MH-04-E-4186.

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1405 OF 2019 Asif Mohd. Mamtule ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 26th July, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time ,stand over to 21/08/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1405 OF 2019 Asif Mohd. Mamtule ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 23rd August, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time ,stand over to 19/09/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1405 OF 2019 Asif Mohd. Mamtule .Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr. Aniket Vagal, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr. P. H. Gaikwad-Patil, APP, for the Respondent – State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 19.09.2019 P.C. . Learned counsel for the Applicant seeks time to file an Affidavit of the Applicant. Accordingly, the Superintendent, Taloja Central Jail to permit the Applicant to affirm the Affidavit before him or any other authorized officer, in accordance with the rules. Stand over to 14.10.2019 . All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 13: shailaja IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1405 OF 2019 Asif Mohd. Mamtule ] Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ] Respondent ….. ….. Mr. Aniket Vagal, for the Applicant. Mr. A.A. Patkar, A.P.P for the Respondent - State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 14th OCTOBER, 2019. P.C. : After arguing for some time, when the Court was not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail, learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw this application. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn. Having regard to the age of of the victim boy i.e 8 years, trial of the Applicant is expedited, lest the victim boy forgets the incident due to passage of time. The learned trial Judge to dispose of the Applicant's case as expeditiously as possible and in any event, within six months from the date of receipt of this order. Application is disposed of. All the concerned to act upon the authenticated copy of this order. [REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.]

Order - Status 8: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 802 OF 2014 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO. 16754 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr. P. R. Moses for the applicant. Mr. S.k. Sonawane for the respondent corporation. CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATED : 30/07/2014. P.C.: . Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2 This civil application is preferred by original plaintiff for condonation of 35 days delay in filing the Appeal From Order against the Order dated 27.03.2014 passed by Bombay City Civil Court, Mumbai in draft Notice of Motion in L.C. Suit No. 804 of 2014. 3 Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant and averment made in civil application, I am satisfied that applicant has made out the case for allowing the civil application. 4 Hence, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 10(i), which reads thus: "(i) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to condone the delay of 35 days in filing the present application." 5 Civil application is disposed of accordingly. (K.K.TATED, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 1153 OF 2004 Shri Ramchandra Krishnaji Shelke (since deceased, through legal heirs) Ankush Ramchandra Shelke 7 ors. ... Appellants V/s Shri Laxman Krishnaji Shelke & ors. ... Respondents Mr. Sachin Chavan holding for Mr. Shriram S. Kulkarni for the appellants. None for the respondents. ALONGWITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 793 OF 2005 Shri Laxman Krishnaji Shelke & ors. ... Appellants V/s Ramchandra Krishnaji Shelke (since deceased, through his L.Rs.) 1(a) Sonabai Ramchandra Shelke & ors. ... Respondents Mr. M.A. Udgikar for the appellants. None for the respondents. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. DATED: 25TH AUGUST, 2005 P.C.: Both appeals are being heard and disposed of by this common order as they arise out of common judgment passed by the Trial Court in R.C.S. No.18 of 1989 and was disposed of by the appellate Court by order dated 5.4.2004 with certain modifications in the lower Court's order. The plaintiff as well as defendant No.1 had referred R.C.A. No. 58 of 1993 and R.C.A. No. 58 of 1993 against the judgment passed by the Trial Court decreeing the suit for the partition of the lower appellate Court and disposed of both appeals by common judgment, whereas Regular Civil Appeal No. 53 of 1993 by original defendant No.1 claiming for certain properties in the suit for self-acquired property was dismissed. Whereas, plaintiff's Regular Civil Appeal No. 58 of 1993 was partly allowed with modification with regard to the quantum of share of the respective parties. Heard learned counsel for the appellants in both appeals. Perused the record. The plaintiff filed the suit for partition and separate possession to the extent of 1/3 share from the suit properties bearing Gat Nos. 77, 435, 1450, 236/1 and 1615 of Village Paragaon, Tal. Daund on the ground 2 that those were ancestral properties and he had 1/3 share therein. Defendants contested the suit inter-alia submitting that part of the suit properties was their self-acquired property. It was also contended that there was previous partition in the year 1964 with regard to certain properties involved in the suit and, therefore, their properties cannot be the subject matter to the partition as prayed for and sought dismissal of the suit. The learned Trial Judge adjudicated the dispute on merits and came to the conclusion that the plaintiff had proved that he had 1/3 share in the suit properties Gat No.77, 435, 1450 and 1615 of Village Paragaon, Tal. Daund, Dist. Pune and hence he also held that defendants 1 and 6 are also entitled for their 1/3 share from the suit properties and decreed the suit. The appeal was carried to the District Court at Baramati. The learned Addil. District Judge, after hearing both parties came to the conclusion that the appeal preferred by the defendant No.1 was liable to be dismissed as he did not prove part of the suit properties as he did not prove that part of the suit 3 property was self-acquired property and modified the decree in the appeal preferred by the plaintiff to the extent that instead of 1/3 share, it was held that party had 1/5 share therein and disposed of the appeal. Hence the present appeal. At the outset, it may be noted that there is absolutely no substantial question of law involved in this case. The learned counsel for the appellant-defendant No.1 submitted that he was serving Post & Telegraph Department and had purchased suit property Gat No.77, 435 and 1450 for his own income for consideration of his being Karta and, therefore, those properties were self-acquired properties. However, both the Courts below have found absolutely no evidence in support of this contention raised on behalf of the appellant-defendant No.1 and his plea to that extent was dismissed. On the other hand, the plaintiff came with the case that defendant had relinquished his share in the suit property and, therefore, the plaintiff would get 1/3 share in the suit properties. However, the lower appellate Court found that there is absolutely no evidence of relinquishment of his suit properties to 4 defendant No.7 and, as such, the plea of the plaintiff that he had 1/3 share in the suit properties was rejected and it was held that parties have 1/5 share in the suit property and, and as such the decree was modified and appeal was allowed. In view of this factual matrix, there is absolutely no reason to disturb the finding recorded by the lower appellate Court in both appeals as they are based on factual aspects of the evidence and, as such, I hold that both appeals are devoid of any merits and hence both appeals stand dismissed with no order as to costs. Consequently, Civil Application No. 1607 of 2004 in Second Appeal No. 1153 of 2004 also stands dismissed with no order as to costs. .....

Order - Status 2: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 16416 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders None present. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDLI) Date : 21 NOVEMBER 2016 Three weeks time i.e. 13.12.2016 is granted to remove office objections. REGISTRAR (JUDLI) RJ I gpj / 21.11.2016

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.16416 OF 2016 Mrs. Janaki Subhash Sawant Petitioner Versus District Superintendent Land Record and others Respondents Mr. P. G. Kathane for the Petitioner. Mr. S. D. Rayrikar, AGP for the Respondents. CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 30th NOVEMBER, 2016 P.C. 1 Heard Mr. P. G. Kathane, the Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner. 2 Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 11.01.2017. In addition to service of notice through Court, the advocate for the Petitioner shall serve a private notice by Registered Post A.D. and/or by Courier service and/or by hand delivery on the Respondents and shall file affidavit of service before the returnable date. 3 The principal contention of the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner is that the consolidation proceedings are sought to be reopened after a period of 45 years. The parties are put to notice that in view of the narrow controversy involved the Petition may be heard and disposed of (905)-WPST-16416-16.doc*.* finally at the admission stage. In the meantime, there would be adinterim relief in terms of prayer clause (c). [R.M.SAVANT, J]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 16416 OF 2016 Mrs. Janaki Subhash Sawant ....Petitioner V/S District Superintendent Land Record, Sangli And Ors ....Respondent Mr. Pramod Gokul Kathane, for Petitioner. Mr. Manoj Ganpat Sawardekar, for R.No. 4A to 4K. Mr. S.D.Rayrikar, AGP, for R.Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Bharat A. Punekar, R.No. 3. CORAM : R.M. SAVANT., J DATE : 22nd February, 2017 P.C. : S.O. to 8th March 2017 for admission. To be placed on supplementary board. Ad-interim relief granted earlier, to continue until then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 16416 OF 2016 Mrs. Janaki Subhash Sawant ....Petitioner V/S District Superintendent Land Record, Sangli And Ors ....Respondent Ms Anusha A Kale i/b Shri Pramod Gokul Kathane For Petitioner Shri Akshay Bobade i/b Shri Bharat A Punekar R.no. 3 Shri S D Rayrikar, AGP R.no. 1 And 2 CORAM : R.M. SAVANT., J DATE : 8th March, 2017 P.C. : Stand over to 10/03/2017. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: wpst1641616(908) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION St. NO. 16416 OF 2016 Mrs. Janaki Subhash Sawant ..Petitioner Vs. District Superintendent Land Record Sangli & Ors ..Respondents Ms Arusha A Kale i/b Mr. P. G. Kathane for the Petitioner Mr. M. G. Sawardekar for the Respondent Nos.4A to 4E Mr. S. H. Kankal AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 Mr. Akshay Bobade for the Respondent Nos.3, 5 and 6 CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 10th MARCH, 2017 P.C. 1 The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to amend so as to annex a typed copy of the impugned order. Leave granted. Amendment to be carried out within one week. List the Petition for admission on 2132017, to be shown on the supplementary board. [R.M.SAVANT, J]

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3333 OF 2017 Mrs Janaki Subhash Sawant ..Petitioner Vs. District Superintendent Land Record, Sangli & Ors ..Respondents Mr. P. G. Kathane for the Petitioner Mr. S. D. Rayrikar AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 Mr. M. G. Sawardekar for the Respondent Nos.4(a) to 4(f) Mr. Akshay Bobade a/w Mr/ B. A. Punekar for the Respondent Nos.3, 5(a) to 5(f), 6(a) to 6(e) CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 21st MARCH, 2017 P.C. 1 The Writ Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked against the order dated 212016 passed by the District Superintendent of Land Records, Sangli, by which order the application for condonation of delay filed by the Respondent No.3 came to be allowed. The said order has been challenged on the ground that the District Superintendent of Land Record has condoned the delay merely on the ground that the principles of natural justice require that such delay is required to be condoned. The District Superintendent of Land Record has not come to a conclusion that the Respondent Nos.3, 5 and 6 have shown sufficient cause for condonation of delay running into 45 years for discretion to be exercised in favour of the said Respondents. The application filed by the said Respondent No.3 was in respect of correcting the consolidation scheme which has been implemented in Village Bhose, Taluka Miraj, District Sangli, as long back as in the year 1965. The Petitioner and the Respondent No.3 are the sons of one Dashrath Bandgar who had two other sons namely Laxman Dashrath Bandgar and Bhauso Dashrath Bandgar. It seems that Laxman and Bhauso have expired and their heirs are the Respondent Nos.5(a) to 5(f) and Respondent Nos.6(a) to 6(e) to the above Petition. However, the statements of the sons of the said Dashrath Bandgar were recorded before the Assistant Consolidation Officer in the year 1965 and it is the case of the Petitioner that the consolidation scheme was propounded on the basis of the said statement which was recorded by the Assistant Consolidation Officer. 2 The Learned Counsel for the parties i.e. Mr. Kathane for the Petitioner and Mr. Bobade for the Respondent Nos.3, 5 and 6 sought to make submissions against and for condonation of delay. 3 In my view, it is not necessary to delve into the said aspect since the District Superintendent of Land Records, Sangli has without coming to a conclusion that sufficient cause for condonation of delay has been made out by the Respondent Nos.3, 5 and 6 has condoned the said huge delay of 45 years. In my view, the interest of justice would be served if the impugned order dated 212016 is quashed and set aside and the matter is remanded back to the District Superintendent of Land Records Sangli for a denovo consideration of the application for condondation of delay. The parties may file additional pleadings if so advised before the District Superintendent of Land Records Sangli. The parties to appear before the District Superintendent of Land Records Sangli on 542017. The District Superintendent of Land Records Sangli thereafter may decide the application for condonation of delay by 155 2017 on its own merits and in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the instant order. Needless to state that the contentions of the parties are kept open for being urged before the District Superintendent of Land Records Sangli. 4 The Petition is allowed to the aforesaid extent and is disposed of. [R.M.SAVANT, J]

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.48 OF 2015 Pritam Shivshankar Yadav $V/s$ The State of Maharashtra ... Applicant .... Respondent None for the Applicant. Mr. H.J. Dedhia, A.P.P., for the Respondent-State. CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.J. DATE : $6^{TH}$ FEBRUARY, 2015. $P.C.$ : In the light of the reliefs prayed for by the Applicant in this application and also in the light of the fact that Civil Writ Petition No.9244 of 2014 is pending before the learned Single Judge of this Court, this application be placed before the learned Single Judge of this Court. This application, therefore, be removed from our board. [DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] $1/1$ Dixit

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL / CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE: 20 NOVEMBER 2015 P.C . :- On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on Supplementary and Daily Boards stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CMIS. Sr. Nos. C.M.I.S. Date 122, 128, 130, 131, 140, 153 11.12.2015 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 119, 120, 121, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 139, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 154, 156 11.12.2015 114, 115, 116, 117, 132, 155 14.12.2015 134, 138 15.12.2015 101, 160, 161, 162 23.12.2015 118, 133, 136, 137, 157, 158, 159 04.01.2016 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 14 18.01.2016 15, 16, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 19.01.2016 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 20.01.2016 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49, 50, 51 21.01.2016 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 22.01.2016 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86 25.01.2016 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 27.01.2016 If in any of the above matters, ad-interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If ad-interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. (M. S. SONAK, J.)

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL/CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : JANUARY 29, 2016 P. C. : On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on Supplementary and Daily Boards stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CMIS. Sr. Nos. C.M.I.S. Date Supplementary Board :­ 923, 925, 926, 927, 928. 12/02/16 (On Supplementary Board) Daily Board :­ 1, 3, 4. 08/02/16 Daily Board :­ 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25. 04/03/16 26, 27, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51. 11/03/16 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102. 18/03/16 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130. 01/04/16 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150. 08/04/16 If in any of the above matters, adinterim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If adinterim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. (M. S. SONAK, J.)

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 48 OF 2015 Pritam Shivshankar Yadav … Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent … None for the Applicant. Ms. M. R. Tidke, APP for the State. CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE :20 AUGUST, 2016 P.C. : The Family Court at Bandra, is directed to dispose of Case No. E-406/2010 as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of 1 year from today. This is if the said case has not already been disposed of by now. By the aforesaid direction, the present application is disposed of. Ms. Tidke the learned Additional Public Prosecutor undertakes to communicate this order to the Principle Judge, Family Court, at Bandra within a period of 2 weeks from today. 3. All concerned to act on the basis of authenticated copy of this order. (M. S. SONAK, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 282 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 464 OF 2017 The Chairman Secretary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. ....Applicant V/S Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake And Anr. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 280 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 464 OF 2017 Smt. Suman T. Dhake ....Applicant V/S The Chairman / Secretary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. And Ors. ....Respondent Mr.Herber A Noronha for Applicant Mr.Abhijit P.Kulkarni for Respondent CORAM : SMT. DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J DATE : 18th January, 2019 P.C. : Stand over to 25/01/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 282 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 464 OF 2017 The Chairman Secretary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. ....Applicant V/S Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake And Anr. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 280 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 464 OF 2017 Smt. Suman T. Dhake ....Applicant V/S The Chairman / Secretary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. And Ors. ....Respondent Adv. Anand R. Nandu i/b A.D.Dubey & H. Noronha For Appellant CORAM : SMT. DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J DATE : 25th January, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the appellant ,Stand over to as per CMIS. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 619 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 464 OF 2017 Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake ....Applicant V/S The Chairman / Secreatary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. And Anr. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 280 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 464 OF 2017 Smt. Suman T. Dhake ....Applicant V/S The Chairman / Secretary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. And Ors. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 282 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 464 OF 2017 The Chairman Secretary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. ....Applicant V/S Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake And Anr. ....Respondent Mr Manoj Upadhyay i/b Mr Herbert Noronha for Applicant / Original Respondent No 1 Mr Anand R Nandu i/b Mr Abhijit P Kulkarni for Original Appellant Mr Shankar P Thorat for Original Respondent No 2 CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J DATE : 7th March, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the Appellant, stand over to 08/03/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 619 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 464 OF 2017 Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake ....Applicant V/S The Chairman / Secreatary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. And Anr. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 280 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 464 OF 2017 Smt. Suman T. Dhake ....Applicant V/S The Chairman / Secretary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. And Ors. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 282 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 464 OF 2017 The Chairman Secretary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. ....Applicant V/S Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake And Anr. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 1323 OF 2019 Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake ....Applicant V/S The Chairman / Secreatary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. And Anr. ....Respondent Mr. A. D. Dubey a/w Ms. Sumandevi Yadav i/b. Mr. Manoj Upadhyay and Mr. Herbert Noronha, for the Applicant/Original Respondent No.1. Mr. Abhijit P. Kulkarni, for the original Appellant. Mr. G.B. Walawalkar, i/b. Mr. S.P. Thorat, for Original Respondent No.2. CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J DATE : 10th April, 2019 P.C. : Civil Applications to come up for hearing after ensuing summer vacation. Stand over to 12/06/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 619 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 464 OF 2017 Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake ....Applicant V/S The Chairman / Secreatary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. And Anr. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 251 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 466 OF 2017 Smt. Suman T. Dhake ....Applicant V/S The Chairman / Secretary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. And Ors. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 280 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 464 OF 2017 Smt. Suman T. Dhake ....Applicant V/S The Chairman / Secretary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. And Ors. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 282 OF 2019 FIRST APPEAL 464 OF 2017 The Chairman Secretary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. ....Applicant V/S Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake And Anr. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 620 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 466 OF 2017 Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake ....Applicant V/S The Chairman / Secreatary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. And Anr. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 1323 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 464 OF 2017 Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake ....Applicant V/S The Chairman / Secreatary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. And Anr. ....Respondent Mr.Manoj Upadhyay i/by Herbert Anthony Noronha For Applicant Mr.Arvind Aswani i/by Abhijit P.Kulkarni for Orig.Appellant Mr.Shankar P.Thorat for Res.No.2 CORAM : K.K. TATED, J DATE : 21st August, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the Orig.Appellant , Stand over to 05/09/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 619 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 464 OF 2017 Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake ....Applicant V/S The Chairman / Secreatary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. And Anr. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 251 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 466 OF 2017 Smt. Suman T. Dhake ....Applicant V/S The Chairman / Secretary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. And Ors. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 280 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 464 OF 2017 Smt. Suman T. Dhake ....Applicant V/S The Chairman / Secretary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. And Ors. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 282 OF 2019 FIRST APPEAL 464 OF 2017 The Chairman Secretary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. ....Applicant V/S Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake And Anr. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 620 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 466 OF 2017 Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake ....Applicant V/S The Chairman / Secreatary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. And Anr. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 1323 OF 2019 In FIRST APPEAL 464 OF 2017 Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake ....Applicant V/S The Chairman / Secreatary Of Andheri Dhake Colony Chs Ltd. And Anr. ....Respondent Mr. A. D. Dubey For Applicant Ms. Nasiz Shaikh i.b. Mr. A.P. Kulkarni for appellant Mr. G. B. Walalwalkar i.b. Mr. S. P. Thorat for R. No. 1 CORAM : K.K. TATED, J DATE : 5th September, 2019 P.C. : By consent Stand Over to 30/09/2019 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 18: 21-CAF-619-2019.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 619 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 280 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 282 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1323 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 464 OF 2017 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 620 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 251 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 466 OF 2017 Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake .... Applicant V/s. The Chairman / Secretary of Andheri Dhake Colony CHS Ltd. & Anr. ... Respondents ….... Mr. Herbert Naronha for the Applicant. Mr. Abhijit P. Kulkarni for the Appellant in FA No. 466 of 2017. Mr. G.B. Walawalkar, i/b Mr. S.P. Thorat for Respondent No.2. CORAM : K.K.Tated, J. DATE : 30th September, 2019 P.C. : Heard learned counsel for parties. At the request of learned advocate for the Applicant, matter to appear on board on 11th November, 2019. (K.K.Tated, J.)

Order - Status 21: 15-FA-464-2017.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 464 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.282 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 464 OF 2017 The Chairman Secretary of Andheri Dhake Colony CHS Ltd. … Appellant Versus Suman Dhake (Since Deceased) Through L.Rs. Pradeep Trimbak Dhake and Ors. … Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.280 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 464 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1323 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.619 OF 2019 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.13659 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 464 OF 2017 Suman Dhake (Since Deceased) Through L.Rs. Pradeep Trimbak Dhake and Ors. … Applicants IN THE MATTER BETWEEN … Appellant … Respondents Mr. Abhijit P. Kulkarni, for the Appellant. Mr. Vivek Pandey, for the Applicant in IA No. 13659 of 2023. ..... ….. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATED : 11th AUGUST, 2023. P.C. Interim Application No.13659 of 2023 along with reply, if any, to be filed by the learned Counsel for the original appellant so as to come up on board of 21st August, 2023. 2 Meanwhile, the parties are at liberty to have negotiation as regards the settlement of dispute. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]

Order - Status 22: 20-FA-464-2017.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 464 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.282 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 464 OF 2017 The Chairman Secretary of Andheri Dhake Colony CHS Ltd. … Appellant Versus Suman Dhake (Since Deceased) Through L.Rs. Pradeep Trimbak Dhake and Ors. … Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.280 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 464 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1323 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.619 OF 2019 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.13659 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 464 OF 2017 Suman Dhake (Since Deceased) Through L.Rs. Pradeep Trimbak Dhake and Ors. … Applicants IN THE MATTER BETWEEN The Chairman Secretary of Andheri Dhake Colony CHS Ltd. … Appellant Versus Suman Dhake (Since Deceased) Through L.Rs. Pradeep Trimbak Dhake and Ors. … Respondents REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2023.08.23 11:12:59 +0530 Mr. Abhijit P. Kulkarni, for the Appellant. Mr. Satyajeet P. Dighe, for the Respondent-MHADA. Mr. Vivek Pandey, for the Applicant in IA No. 13659 of 2023. ..... ….. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATED : 21st AUGUST, 2023. Mr.Satyajeet P. Dighe appears on behalf of the original defendant No.1-MHADA. He submits that he appeared today for the first time and, therefore, seeks time to take instructions. 2 Learned Counsel for the applicant undertakes to give copy of the application to the learned Counsel for MHADA. 3 Learned Counsel for the appellant is fair enough and, on instructions, submits that for two weeks appellant would not enter into any development agreement with the developers. Statement is accepted. 4 List on 5 th September, 2023. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] P.C.

Order - Status 23: IN THE MATTER BETWEEN: The Chairman Secretary of Andheri ] IN THE MATTER BETWEEN: ] Appellant Vs. The Chairman Secretary of Andheri ] Respondents Dhake Colony CHS Ltd. ] Appellant Mr. Abhijit Kulkarni a/w Mr. Krishna, Mr. Gaurav Shahane and Ms. Sweta Shah, for Appellant. Mr. Vivek Pandey a/w Ms. Ridhima and Mr. Pranjal Upadhyay, for Respondent. ….. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATE : 5TH SEPTEMBER, 2023. P.C. List on 13th September, 2023. Statement made by the learned Counsel for the appellant on 21st August, 2023 will continue to operate till the next date. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]

Order - Status 24: Shailaja IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.464 OF 2017 a/w CIVIL APPLICATION NO.282 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.464 OF 2017 The Chairman Secretary of Andheri ] Dhake Colony CHS Ltd. ] Appellant Vs. Suman Trimbak Dhake (since deceased) ] through Legal Representatives; ] 1A. Pradeep Trimbak Dhake and others ] Respondents A/W CIVIL APPLICATION NO.280 OF 2019 A/W CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1323 OF 2019 A/W CIVIL APPLICATION NO.619 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.464 OF 2017 Suman Trimbak Dhake ] Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN: The Chairman Secretary of Andheri Dhake Colony CHS Ltd. ] ] Appellant Vs. Suman Trimbak Dhake and another ] Respondents A/W INTERIM APPLICATION NO.13659 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.464 OF 2017 IN ] FIRST APPEAL NO.464 OF 2017 ] Suman Trimbak Dhake ] Applicants (Deceased) through Legal Representative Pradeep Trimbak Dhake and others ] ] Applicants IN THE MATTER BETWEEN: ] The Chairman Secretary of Andheri ] Appellant Dhake Colony CHS Ltd. ] Appellant Vs. Ms. Sweta Shah i/b Mr. Abhijit Kulkarni, for Appellant. Mr. Vivek Pandey, for Applicant in Interim Application No.13659 of 2023 and for Respondent Nos.1 (a) to 1E (iii) in First Appeal. ….. Mr. Satyajeet P. Dighe, for Respondent No.2. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATE : 13th September, 2023. P.C. At the request of the learned Counsel for the respondent, list on 12th October, 2023 on the final hearing board. Statement made by learned Counsel for the appellant on 21st August, 2023 will continue to operate till the next date. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]

Order - Status 25: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13659 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 464 OF 2017 Suman Dhake (decd.) Thr. LRS. Pradeep Trimbak Dhake And Ors. ... Applicants Versus The Chairman Secretary of Andheri Dhake Colony C.H.S.L., Mumbai And Ors. ...Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.282 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 464 OF 2017 The Chairman Secretary of ...Applicant Andheri Dhake Colony CHS Ltd. Versus Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake And Anr. ...Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.619 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 464 OF 2017 Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake ...Applicant Versus The Chairman / Secreatary of Andheri Dhake Colony CHS Ltd. And Anr. ...Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1323 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 464 OF 2017 Smt. Suman Trimbak Dhake ...Applicant Versus The Chairman / Secreatary of Andheri Dhake Colony CHS Ltd. And Anr. ...Respondents SUNNY ANKUSHRAO THOTE Digitally signed by SUNNY ANKUSHRAO THOTE Date: 2023 10 Date: 2023.10.16 11:10:29 +077 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.280 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.464 OF 2017 Smt. Suman T. Dhake ...Applicant Versus The Chairman / Secretary of Andheri Dhake Colony CHS Ltd. And Ors. ...Respondents Ms. Ridhima Mangaonkar i/by Mr. Vivek Pandey for the Applicant in Interim Application No.13659 of 2023. Ms. Shweta Shah i/by Mr.Abhijit P. Kulkarni for the Appellant. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : 12th OCTOBER, 2023. P.C.: Not on Board. Mentioned. Taken on Board. This matter is moved for extension of ad-interim relief granted by this Court on 13th September, 2023. Stand over to 19th October, 2023**.** Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till then. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)

Order - Status 4: ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1967 OF 2007 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.P.N.Joshi for the appellant. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED : 25th July, 2007 P.C. Issue notice, returnable within two weeks. The private notice is also permitted. [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]

Order - Status 6: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE FIRST APPEAL NO.1967 OF 2007 (SERIAL NOS.45) Coram : Anoop V.Mohta,J Date : 8th August, 2007. PC After service. (Anoop V.Mohta,J)

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET FIRST APPEAL NO.1967 OF 2007 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.P.N.Joshi for the Appellant CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 30,2007. P.C.: Admit. Hearing is expedited. Printing is dispensed with. The Appellant to implead Gram Panchyat,Dahegaon as a party Respondent. Requisite number of copies of Private Paperbooks along with Decree Forms shall be filed by the Appellant within a period of one year from today. If compliance is not made within stipulated time, the Appeal shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution without further reference to the court. JUDGE

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 3: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 4: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 5: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 6: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3536 OF 2021 Ess Infraproject Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner Vs. The Union of India & Ors. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3365 OF 2018 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2217 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3219 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.95 OF 2020 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.267 OF 2020 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.321 OF 2020 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.652 OF 2020 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.656 OF 2020 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.213 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1901 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2284 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2442 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2446 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2863 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2885 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3005 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3079 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3269 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3317 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3732 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.35 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.367 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.440 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.712 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2601 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3110 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.12893 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.12909 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.15936 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.19512 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.21326 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.22815 OF 2022 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8388 OF 2019 Finolex Industries Ltd. … Petitioner Vs. The Union of India, Thr. The Revenue Secretary & Ors. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9640 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.874 OF 2020 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2885 OF 2020 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9106 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.521 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3522 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9107 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4494 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9105 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9109 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9113 OF 2022 ------- Mr. Bharat Raichandani a/w Mr. Mahesh Raichandani and Mr. Rishabh Jain i/by UBR Legal Advocates for Petitioner/s in WP No.2219 of 2019 and WP No.3536 of 2021. Mr. Harish Bindumadhavan a/w Mr. Bharat Raichandani, Mr. Mahesh Raichandani and Mr. Rishabh Jain i/b UBR Legal Advocates for Petitioner/s in WP No.267 of 2020. Mr. Gopal Mundhra a/w Ms. Ankita Vashistha i/by Economic Laws Practice for Petitioner/s in WP No.3365 of 2018. Mr. Purushartha Satish i/by Mr. Prabhakar K. Shetty for Petitioner/s in WP No.3219 of 2019. Mr. Rahul C. Thakar i/by Mr. C. B. Thakar for Petitioner/s in WP No.95 of 2020, WP No.2284 of 2021, WP No.3005 of 2021, WP No.3079 of 2021, WP No.3269 of 2021, WP No.3317 of 2021, WP No.35 of 2022, WP No.367 of 2022, WP No.440 of 2022, WP No.712 of 2022, WP No.2601 of 2022, WP(L) No.12893 of 2022, WP(L) No.12909 of 2022, WP(L) No.15936 of 2022, WP(L) No.19512 of 2022, WP(L) No.21326 of 2022 and WP(L) No.22815 of 2022. Mr. Manohar Samal i/by Mr. Ratan Samal for Petitioner/s in WP No.321 of 2020. Ms. Priyanka Ghosh i/by Mr. Abhiraj Parab for Petitioner/s in WP No.652 of 2020. Mr. Shashank Shekhar a/w Ms. Ritika Ajitsaria i/b Trilegal for Petitioner/s in WP No.656 of 2020. Mr.D.H. Nadkarni i/by Legal Solutions for Petitioner/s in WP No.213 of 2021. Mr. Parth Badheka i/by Ms. Nikita Badheka for Petitioner/s WP Nos.2442 of 2021 and WP No.2446 of 2021. Mr.V.M. Chavda for Petitioner/s in WP No.2863 of 2021. Ms. Padmavati Patil with Mr. Kiran Chavan i/by CENEX Services for Petitioner/s in WP No.3110 of 2022. Mr. Sriram Sridharan for Petitioner/s in WP No.8388 of 2019. Mr. Rahul C. Thakar i/by C. B. Thakar for Petitioner/s in WP No.874 of 2020, WP No.2885 of 2020, WP No.9106 of 2022, WP No.9107 of 2022. Mr. Sanket Bora a/w Ms. Vidhi Punmiya i/b SPCM Legal for Petitioner/s in WP No.521 of 2022. Mr. Ishan Patkar a/w Mr. Yash Dhond & Ms. Chaitali Raul i/b Sangram Chinnappa for Petitioner/s in WP No.3522 of 2022. Mr. Makrand Joshi i/b Max Legal for Petitioner/s in WP No.4494 of 2022, WP No.9109 of 2022. Mr. Bharat Raichandani a/w Mr. Mahesh Raichandani and Mr. Rishabh Jain i/by UBR Legal for Petitioner/s in WP(ST) No.95609 of 2020. Mr. Jitendra Motwani, Mr. Chirag Shetty, Ms. Shilpi Jain for Petitioner/s in WP No.9113 of 2022. Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra, Mr. Vijay H. Kantharia, Mr. Sham V. Walve, Mr. Swapnil Bangur, Mr. Ram Ochani, Mr.P.S. Patkar, Mr. Karan Adik, Ms. Ruju Thakker, Ms. Sangeeta Yadav, Mr. Dhananjay B. Deshmukh, Mr. Satyaprakash Sharma, Mr. Siddharth Chandrashekhar, Mr. Ashutosh Mishra and Mr. Amit Singh for Respondents-Union of India, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs and Goods and Services Tax Council. Ms. Jyoti Chavan, AGP a/w Mr. Himanshu Takke, AGP for Respondents – State of Maharashtra. Mr. Vijay H. Kantharia a/w Mr. Ram Ochani for Respondent/s in WP No.8388 of 2019, WP No.9640 of 2019. S. D. Vyas, GP B' PNL for Respondent-State in WP No.8388 of 2019@WP No.9640 of 2019, WP No.874 of 2020, WP No.2885 of 2020, WP No.9106 of 2022, WP No.9107 of 2022, WP No.4494 of 2022, WP No.9105 of 2022 Mr. Pradeep Jetly Senior Advocate, Maya Majumdar for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 in WP No.521 of 2022. Mr. Pradeep Jetly, Senior Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2, 3, 4 in WP No.521 of 2022. Mr. Karan Adhik with Mr. Ram Ochani for Respondent/s in WP No.3522 of 2022. Mr. Pradeep Jetly, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Jitendra Mishra a/w Ms. Sangeeta Yadav for Respondent/s in WP No.9107 of 2022. Mr. Swapnil Bangur for Respondent/s in WP No.9107 of 2022. Mr. Ashutosh Misra for Respondent No.1-Union of India in WP No.4494 of 2022. Mr. Jitendra Mishra, Mr. Dhananjay Deshmukh, Mr. Ashutosh Misra, Smt. R. A. Salunke, AGP for Respondent-State in WP No. 4494 of 2022. Mr.P.S. Jetly Senior Advocate with Mr. Ram Ochani, Smt. R.A. Salunkhe AGP for Respondent/s in WP No.9105 of 2022. Mr. Pradeep Jetly, Senior Advocate for Respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 in WP No.9105 of 2022. Mr. Jitendra Mishra, Mr. Dhananjay Deshmukh, Mr. Ashutosh Misra, Ms. Sangeeta Yadav for Respondent/s in WP No.9109 of 2022. CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & A.S. DOCTOR, JJ. DATED : 29th JULY 2022 P.C. : The Hon'ble Apex Court in order dated 22nd July, 2022 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(C) No(s).32709-32710 of 2018 and other matters has directed the GST Network to open the common portal to file/rectify TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 for a period of two months, i.e., with effect from 1st September, 2022 to 31st October, 2022 to enable the different private parties to avail Transitional Credit. The order reads as under :- "O R D E R Permission to file Special Leave Petition(s) is allowed. Delay condoned. Having heard learned Additional Solicitor General, learned counsel appearing for different States and learned counsel appearing for different private parties and having perused the record, we are of the view that it is just and proper to issue the following directions in these cases : Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) is directed to open common portal for filing concerned forms for availing Transitional Credit through TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 for two months i.e. w.e.f. 01.09.2022 to 31.10.2022. Considering the judgments of the High Courts on the then prevailing peculiar circumstances, any aggrieved registered assessee is directed to file the relevant form or revise the already filed form irrespective of whether the taxpayer has filed writ petition before the High Court or whether the case of the taxpayer has been decided by Information Technology Grievance Redressal Committee (ITGRC). GSTN has to ensure that there are no technical glitch during the said time. The concerned officers are given 90 days thereafter to verify the veracity of the claim/transitional credit and pass appropriate orders thereon on merits after granting appropriate reasonable opportunity to the parties concerned. Thereafter, the allowed Transitional credit is to be reflected in the Electronic Credit Ledger. If required GST Council may also issue appropriate guidelines to the field formations in scrutinizing the claims. The Special Leave Petitions are disposed of accordingly. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of." In the circumstances, since all the Petitioners can avail of this window, Petitions stand disposed. (A.S. DOCTOR, J.) ( K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)