All Cases

Order - Status 4: ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1967 OF 2007 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.P.N.Joshi for the appellant. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED : 25th July, 2007 P.C. Issue notice, returnable within two weeks. The private notice is also permitted. [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]

Order - Status 6: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE FIRST APPEAL NO.1967 OF 2007 (SERIAL NOS.45) Coram : Anoop V.Mohta,J Date : 8th August, 2007. PC After service. (Anoop V.Mohta,J)

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET FIRST APPEAL NO.1967 OF 2007 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.P.N.Joshi for the Appellant CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 30,2007. P.C.: Admit. Hearing is expedited. Printing is dispensed with. The Appellant to implead Gram Panchyat,Dahegaon as a party Respondent. Requisite number of copies of Private Paperbooks along with Decree Forms shall be filed by the Appellant within a period of one year from today. If compliance is not made within stipulated time, the Appeal shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution without further reference to the court. JUDGE

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 3: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 4: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 5: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 6: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3536 OF 2021 Ess Infraproject Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner Vs. The Union of India & Ors. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3365 OF 2018 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2217 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3219 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.95 OF 2020 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.267 OF 2020 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.321 OF 2020 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.652 OF 2020 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.656 OF 2020 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.213 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1901 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2284 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2442 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2446 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2863 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2885 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3005 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3079 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3269 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3317 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3732 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.35 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.367 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.440 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.712 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2601 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3110 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.12893 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.12909 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.15936 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.19512 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.21326 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.22815 OF 2022 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8388 OF 2019 Finolex Industries Ltd. … Petitioner Vs. The Union of India, Thr. The Revenue Secretary & Ors. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9640 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.874 OF 2020 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2885 OF 2020 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9106 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.521 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3522 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9107 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4494 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9105 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9109 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9113 OF 2022 ------- Mr. Bharat Raichandani a/w Mr. Mahesh Raichandani and Mr. Rishabh Jain i/by UBR Legal Advocates for Petitioner/s in WP No.2219 of 2019 and WP No.3536 of 2021. Mr. Harish Bindumadhavan a/w Mr. Bharat Raichandani, Mr. Mahesh Raichandani and Mr. Rishabh Jain i/b UBR Legal Advocates for Petitioner/s in WP No.267 of 2020. Mr. Gopal Mundhra a/w Ms. Ankita Vashistha i/by Economic Laws Practice for Petitioner/s in WP No.3365 of 2018. Mr. Purushartha Satish i/by Mr. Prabhakar K. Shetty for Petitioner/s in WP No.3219 of 2019. Mr. Rahul C. Thakar i/by Mr. C. B. Thakar for Petitioner/s in WP No.95 of 2020, WP No.2284 of 2021, WP No.3005 of 2021, WP No.3079 of 2021, WP No.3269 of 2021, WP No.3317 of 2021, WP No.35 of 2022, WP No.367 of 2022, WP No.440 of 2022, WP No.712 of 2022, WP No.2601 of 2022, WP(L) No.12893 of 2022, WP(L) No.12909 of 2022, WP(L) No.15936 of 2022, WP(L) No.19512 of 2022, WP(L) No.21326 of 2022 and WP(L) No.22815 of 2022. Mr. Manohar Samal i/by Mr. Ratan Samal for Petitioner/s in WP No.321 of 2020. Ms. Priyanka Ghosh i/by Mr. Abhiraj Parab for Petitioner/s in WP No.652 of 2020. Mr. Shashank Shekhar a/w Ms. Ritika Ajitsaria i/b Trilegal for Petitioner/s in WP No.656 of 2020. Mr.D.H. Nadkarni i/by Legal Solutions for Petitioner/s in WP No.213 of 2021. Mr. Parth Badheka i/by Ms. Nikita Badheka for Petitioner/s WP Nos.2442 of 2021 and WP No.2446 of 2021. Mr.V.M. Chavda for Petitioner/s in WP No.2863 of 2021. Ms. Padmavati Patil with Mr. Kiran Chavan i/by CENEX Services for Petitioner/s in WP No.3110 of 2022. Mr. Sriram Sridharan for Petitioner/s in WP No.8388 of 2019. Mr. Rahul C. Thakar i/by C. B. Thakar for Petitioner/s in WP No.874 of 2020, WP No.2885 of 2020, WP No.9106 of 2022, WP No.9107 of 2022. Mr. Sanket Bora a/w Ms. Vidhi Punmiya i/b SPCM Legal for Petitioner/s in WP No.521 of 2022. Mr. Ishan Patkar a/w Mr. Yash Dhond & Ms. Chaitali Raul i/b Sangram Chinnappa for Petitioner/s in WP No.3522 of 2022. Mr. Makrand Joshi i/b Max Legal for Petitioner/s in WP No.4494 of 2022, WP No.9109 of 2022. Mr. Bharat Raichandani a/w Mr. Mahesh Raichandani and Mr. Rishabh Jain i/by UBR Legal for Petitioner/s in WP(ST) No.95609 of 2020. Mr. Jitendra Motwani, Mr. Chirag Shetty, Ms. Shilpi Jain for Petitioner/s in WP No.9113 of 2022. Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra, Mr. Vijay H. Kantharia, Mr. Sham V. Walve, Mr. Swapnil Bangur, Mr. Ram Ochani, Mr.P.S. Patkar, Mr. Karan Adik, Ms. Ruju Thakker, Ms. Sangeeta Yadav, Mr. Dhananjay B. Deshmukh, Mr. Satyaprakash Sharma, Mr. Siddharth Chandrashekhar, Mr. Ashutosh Mishra and Mr. Amit Singh for Respondents-Union of India, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs and Goods and Services Tax Council. Ms. Jyoti Chavan, AGP a/w Mr. Himanshu Takke, AGP for Respondents – State of Maharashtra. Mr. Vijay H. Kantharia a/w Mr. Ram Ochani for Respondent/s in WP No.8388 of 2019, WP No.9640 of 2019. S. D. Vyas, GP B' PNL for Respondent-State in WP No.8388 of 2019@WP No.9640 of 2019, WP No.874 of 2020, WP No.2885 of 2020, WP No.9106 of 2022, WP No.9107 of 2022, WP No.4494 of 2022, WP No.9105 of 2022 Mr. Pradeep Jetly Senior Advocate, Maya Majumdar for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 in WP No.521 of 2022. Mr. Pradeep Jetly, Senior Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2, 3, 4 in WP No.521 of 2022. Mr. Karan Adhik with Mr. Ram Ochani for Respondent/s in WP No.3522 of 2022. Mr. Pradeep Jetly, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Jitendra Mishra a/w Ms. Sangeeta Yadav for Respondent/s in WP No.9107 of 2022. Mr. Swapnil Bangur for Respondent/s in WP No.9107 of 2022. Mr. Ashutosh Misra for Respondent No.1-Union of India in WP No.4494 of 2022. Mr. Jitendra Mishra, Mr. Dhananjay Deshmukh, Mr. Ashutosh Misra, Smt. R. A. Salunke, AGP for Respondent-State in WP No. 4494 of 2022. Mr.P.S. Jetly Senior Advocate with Mr. Ram Ochani, Smt. R.A. Salunkhe AGP for Respondent/s in WP No.9105 of 2022. Mr. Pradeep Jetly, Senior Advocate for Respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 in WP No.9105 of 2022. Mr. Jitendra Mishra, Mr. Dhananjay Deshmukh, Mr. Ashutosh Misra, Ms. Sangeeta Yadav for Respondent/s in WP No.9109 of 2022. CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & A.S. DOCTOR, JJ. DATED : 29th JULY 2022 P.C. : The Hon'ble Apex Court in order dated 22nd July, 2022 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(C) No(s).32709-32710 of 2018 and other matters has directed the GST Network to open the common portal to file/rectify TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 for a period of two months, i.e., with effect from 1st September, 2022 to 31st October, 2022 to enable the different private parties to avail Transitional Credit. The order reads as under :- "O R D E R Permission to file Special Leave Petition(s) is allowed. Delay condoned. Having heard learned Additional Solicitor General, learned counsel appearing for different States and learned counsel appearing for different private parties and having perused the record, we are of the view that it is just and proper to issue the following directions in these cases : Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) is directed to open common portal for filing concerned forms for availing Transitional Credit through TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 for two months i.e. w.e.f. 01.09.2022 to 31.10.2022. Considering the judgments of the High Courts on the then prevailing peculiar circumstances, any aggrieved registered assessee is directed to file the relevant form or revise the already filed form irrespective of whether the taxpayer has filed writ petition before the High Court or whether the case of the taxpayer has been decided by Information Technology Grievance Redressal Committee (ITGRC). GSTN has to ensure that there are no technical glitch during the said time. The concerned officers are given 90 days thereafter to verify the veracity of the claim/transitional credit and pass appropriate orders thereon on merits after granting appropriate reasonable opportunity to the parties concerned. Thereafter, the allowed Transitional credit is to be reflected in the Electronic Credit Ledger. If required GST Council may also issue appropriate guidelines to the field formations in scrutinizing the claims. The Special Leave Petitions are disposed of accordingly. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of." In the circumstances, since all the Petitioners can avail of this window, Petitions stand disposed. (A.S. DOCTOR, J.) ( K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

#VALUE!

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER --- CORAM : M.L.TAHALIYANI, J. DATED : 4th September, 2013 P.C. : On account of paucity of time, the following matters on the daily board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CMIS. --- Sr.Nos. Adjourned Date 06,09,10,17,20,36,37,38,40,41,42,44 16/09/2013 12,13,14,15,16,43 17/09/2013 19, 22, 23 08/10/2013 24,26,27,28,29,31,32,33,34,35,45 10/10/2013 25 24/09/2013 39 27/04/2013 46,47,48 19/09/2013 49, 50 20/09/2013 If any ad-interim or interim relief granted in the aforesaid matters is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the dates which are fixed under this order. If there is an extreme urgency, the parties can get the papers produced before the Court.

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1939 OF 2013 Ganesh Arjun Ghadage And Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. Vivek Salunke Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. D.R. More, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : M.L.TAHALIYANI, J. DATED : DECEMBER 18, 2013. P. C.: . Heard learned Counsel Mr. Vivek Salunke for the Petitioners and Mr. D.R. More, A.P.P. for the State. Issue notice to Respondent No.2 returnable on 15 January 2014. (M.L.TAHALIYANI, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1939 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders None for the Petitioner Mr. D. R. More APP for the State. CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J. DATED : JANUARY 24, 2014 P.C. : None present for the Petitioner. Learned counsel for the Petitioner shall furnish a complete spare to the Office within one week from today. Upon furnishing spare copy, Office to issue fresh notice to the Respondent. Notice returnable 4 weeks. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 12: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1939 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. Rupesh Zade h/f. Mr. Pravin Dubade, advocate for Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Shitole, APP for State. CORAM :SMT.SADHANA S. JADHAV , J DATE :JUNE 9, 2014 P.C.: 1 Stand over to 23/6/2014. Pendency of this Writ Petition shall not be construed as a stay to the trial in Special Case No. 25/2011 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati. Office to communicate this order to the concerned court. ( SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV , J) ..... Talwalkar 1/1

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1939 OF 2013 Ganesh Arjun Ghadage and others .....Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra and another ....Respondents Mr. Vivek Salunke for Petitioner Mr. Rupesh Zade for Respondent Mr. A. S. Shitole APP for the State. CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J. DATED : JUNE 23, 2014 PC : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent. Petitioner herein had filed an application seeking relief that Special Case No. 25 of 2011 be tried along with R.C.C. No. 32 of 2012. The said application was rejected by the Sessions Court on the ground that the incident reported in R.C.C. No. 32 of 2012 is not arising out of the same incident and therefore, application seeking clubbing of the cases was rejected. Hence, this writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charge is not yet framed. However, it appears from the charge-sheet that there are allegations against present petitioners under the provisions of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 and therefore, petitioner would have to be tried by the Special Court. In that case, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused in R.C.C. No. 166 of 2011 should also be tried by the Special Court. However, as against them, there are no allegations under the provisions of the Special Act and therefore, they would have to be tried by the Court of Magistrate. In view of this, petition stands disposed of. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT FIRST APPEAL NO. 2176 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Appellants V/s. Janabai Shalik Pethkar & Anr. …Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3498 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2176 OF 2005 Janabi Shalik Pethkar …Appellant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST.) NO. 789 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2176 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Appellants V/s. Janabai Shalik Pethkar …Respondent WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2177 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Appellants V/s. Shankar Hiru Chipalekar D/h Chindhibai Shankar Chipalekar & Ors. …Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3497 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2176 OF 2005 Shankar Hiru Chipalekar D/H Chindhibai Shankar Chipalekar & Ors. …Appellants V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST.) NO. 79O OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2177 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Appellants V/s. Shankar Hiru Chipalekar D/h Chindhibai Shankar Chipalekar & Ors. …Respondents ---------- Mr. A. R. Patil, for State-Appellants/Applicants. Mr. S. G. Surana, for the Respondents. ----------- CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. D. S. DESHMUKH, REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL-II) V. A. SATHE, OSD AT CPC DATE : 11th DECEMBER, 2021 P.C. : . Mr. A. R. Patil, learned Additional Government Pleader, on instructions, had given an offer of Rs.25/- per sq. mt. As the appellants are not present, further formalities could not be complied with. Therefore, as submitted by their learned Advocate, all these matters be kept in next Lok Adalat. (V. A. SATHE) (D. S. DESHMUKH) (S. M. MODAK, J.) OSD at CPC Registrar (Judl.-II) (Judge)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2895 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO. 24862 OF 2003 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or Judge's orders. orders or directions and Registrar's orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED : 3rd Sept., 2004. P.C.: If the entire amount of Court fee payable in the First Appeal is paid within a period of six weeks from today, the First Appeal will stand restored. If the Court fee is not paid within the stipulated time, the order of dismissal will stand. No further extension will be granted. Civil Application stands disposed of. Judge.