All Cases

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : P.N. DESHMUKH, J DATE : 4th May, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourn. Stand over to 21/06/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr.Raghuvanshi i/b Mr.Shailesh Kharat For Applicant Mr.S.S.Pednekar - APP for State CORAM : SMT. S.S. JADHAV, J DATE : 21st June, 2018 P.C. : Learned APP waives service and seeks time to take instructions. Time as prayed for is granted. Stand over to 13/07/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr. Ashish Raghuvanshi I/by Mr. Shailesh Kharat for the Applicant. Mr. S.S.Pednekar, APP for the State. Coram : Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav **, J.** Date : 13th July, 2018 P.C.: 1 Learned APP has drawn the attention of this Court to the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ghodegaon rejecting the application filed by the prosecution seeking the statements of the witnesses recorded under Section 164(5) of Cr.P.C. dated 9th June 2015. 2 Learned Magistrate shall comply with Sections 207 and 208 of Cr.P.C. Dusane 2/2 19 ba 1171.2018.doc 3 The prosecution is at liberty to file a fresh application before the Magistrate seeking the statements of the witnesses recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. 4 Stand over to 1st August 2018. 5 Office to communicate this order to the learned J.M.F.C., Ghodegaon forthwith. ( Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav **, J)**

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.1171 OF 2018 ….. Kaluram Bhagwan Kale …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr. Shailesh Kharat for the Applicant. Ms Pallavi N. Dabholkar, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED: 20th AUGUST, 2018. P.C.: The learned APP submits that copies of the statements of the witnesses under Section 164 (5) of the Cr.P.C have now been furnished. She undertakes to furnish copy of the same to the learned counsel for the Applicant in the course of the day. In view of above, stand over to 3.9.2018. (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) Megha Shridhar Parab Digitally signed by Megha Shridhar Parab Date: 2018.08.21 11:30:20 +0530

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr A.R. Avchat i/b Mr Shailesh Kharat For Applicant Ms Pallavi N. Dabholkar APP for State CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J DATE : 3rd September, 2018 P.C. : At the request of Learned Advocate for the Applicant, Stand over to 17/09/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ….Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ….Respondent Mr. Karan Jain i/b. Mr. Shailesh Kharat for the applicant. Ms. J.S. Lohokare, APP for the State. CORAM: SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED: 17th SEPTEMBER, 2018. P.C.: . Mr. Karan Jain, learned counsel for the applicant submits that copy of the statement of the witnesses under section 164 of Criminal Procedure Code has not been furnished. Ms. J.S. Lohokare, learned APP has furnished copy of the statement of witnesses today, in view of which learned counsel for the applicant seeks time. Stand over to 01st October, 2018. (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent None For Applicant Mrs J.S. Lohokare APP for State CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J DATE : 1st October, 2018 P.C. : None for Applicant. Opportunity Given. Stand Over to 15/10/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 20: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr Shailesh Kharat For Applicant Ms J.S. Lohokare APP for State CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J DATE : 15th October, 2018 P.C. : At the request of Learned Advocate for the Applicant, Stand Over to 17/10/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr Shailesh Kharat For Applicant Mrs J.S. Lohokare APP for State CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J DATE : 17th October, 2018 P.C. : At the request of Ld.APP for State, Stand Over to 31/10/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr Milan A. Heliballi i/b Mr Shailesh Kharat For Applicant Ms Pallavi N. Dabholkar APP for State CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J DATE : 31st October, 2018 P.C. : Mentioned. At the request of Learned Advocate for the Applicant, Stand Over to 26/11/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICTION NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram B.Kale ...Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. Mr. M.A. Hebballi i/by Shailesh Kharat for the Applicant. Smt. S.S.Lohokare, APP. for the Respondent/State. CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE 26th November, 2018 PC : The learned counsel for the applicant seeks time on the ground that, the Advocate on record is held up in another Court. The record indicates that on 3.9.2018 and 17.9.2018 the learned counsel for the applicant had sought time. Again on 1.10.2018 none appeared for the applicant and this Court adjourned the matter to 15.10.2018. Again on 15.10.2018 and 31.10.2018 the learned counsel for the applicant had sought time. It appears that, the applicant is not interested in pursuing the application. Application is dismissed for want of prosecution. (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 30: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Shailesh Kharat For Applicant. Mr.S.H.Yadav, APP For State. CORAM : P.N. DESHMUKH, J DATE : 10th April, 2019 P.C. : On the application of learned APP for want of instructions and as the I.O.is not present, Stand over to 10.06.2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 32: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Shailesh Kharat For Applicant S.H.Yadav APP for the State/Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 10th June, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned APP for the State/ respondent, Stand over to 17/06/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 34: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 17th June, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to 09/07/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 36: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 9th July, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to 23/07/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 38: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 23rd July, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to 07/08/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 40: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Shailesh Kharat For Applicant S.H.Yadav APP for State/Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 7th August, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned APP for State/respondent , Stand over to 06/09/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 42: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 6th September, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 26/09/2019 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 44: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr.Shailesh Kharat For Applicant. Mr.S.H.Yadav, APP For State. CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 26th September, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the petitioners / respondent / applicant , Stand over to 06/11/2019 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 48: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ...Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent …. Mr. Shailesh Kharat, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. S.H. Yadav, APP for State-Respondent. …. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 6th November 2019 PC : Without advancing any arguments on the merits of the case, the learned counsel for the Applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to prefer an application before the Sessions Court, in view of the fact that, during the pendency of this application, co-accused has been granted bail. Hence, the application to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Application stands disposed of accordingly. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) 1 of 1 6-BA-1171-18.doc

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 5760 OF 2021 Amrut Abhiman Nikam And Anr PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr RESPONDENT Mr. Bharat Gadhavi i/b Tejas Dande for Petitioner Mr. Vishal Navale for Respondent No. 2 Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for State/Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR, JJ DATE : 13th July, 2022 P.C. : By consent S. O. to 17/08/2022 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5760 OF 2021 Amrut Abhiman Nikam and another … Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and another … Respondents …...... Mr. Bharat Gadhavi instructed by Mr. Tejesh Dande for the Petitioners. …...... Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State. Mr. Vishal Navale for Respondent No.2. CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND N.R. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 17 AUGUST 2022 P.C. :- At the request of the learned Counsel for the Petitioners, stand over to 26 September 2022. ( N.R. BORKAR, J. ) ( NITIN JAMDAR, J. )

Order - Status 8: common order-paucity-26.9.2022.doc NISHA Digitally signed by NISHA SANDEEP HITTNIS CHITNIS 13:59:48 + 0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MATTERS NOTIFIED AT SERIAL NOS. 71 to 78, 79 to 84, 86 to 89, 90, 92, 93, 95 to 108, 109, 110 & 112 to 115, 117 to 128, 130 to 136 and 138 to 141 ON THE BOARD DATED 26 th SEPTEMBER 2022 CAUSE TITLES AND APPEARANCES AS NOTIFIED ON THE BOARD DATED 26 th SEPTEMBER 2022 CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATE : 26 th SEPTEMBER 2022 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, it is not possible to proceed with the hearing of these matters today. All these matters are adjourned and will be listed on the Board on the respective assigned dates as mentioned below:- Serial Nos. Assigned Date 71 to 78 10/11/2022 79 to 84 11/11/2022 86 to 89 11/11/2022 90, 92, 93 14/11/2022 95 to 108 17/11/2022 common order-paucity-26.9.2022.doc 109, 110 & 112 to 115 23/11/2022 117 to 128 23/11/2022 130 to 136 24/11/2022 138 to 141 24/11/2022 Ad-interim order granted in any of the above said matters, if any, to continue till the respective assigned date. Order accordingly. S. M. MODAK, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 5760 OF 2021 Amrut Abhiman Nikam And Anr PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE JUSTICE REVATI MOHITE DERE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. N. LADDHA, JJ DATE : 11th November, 2022 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 13/12/2022. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 13: 79-WP-5760-2021.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5760 OF 2021 Amrut Abhiman Nikam and Ors. … Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents Mr. Pratik Sabrad i/b Tejesh Dande and Assoc., for the Petitioners. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent No.1 – State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 13th DECEMBER, 2022. P. C. : On today's board at Sr. No. 79. Mentioned out of turn. 2 Learned Counsel for the petitioners states that during the pendency of the aforesaid petition, the matter was compounded before the learned Additional C.J. M., Malegaon (Nashik). Learned Counsel has tendered a photo copy of the said order dated 12.11.2022. The same is taken on record. The said order shows that in view of the compounding, the petitioners have been acquitted of the offence under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 16:24:20 +0530 Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2022.12.14 Rekha Patil 1/2 3 In view of the aforesaid, nothing survives in the aforesaid Petition. 4 Petition stands disposed of accordingly. PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1292 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6289 OF 2017 Pradeep Kumar M.S. ..Applicant/Petitioner Vs Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) and ors. ..Respondents Mr. A.D. Shetty for the Applicant/Petitioner.. Y.S.Bhate i/b Anirudha Garge for Respondents No.5. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : JUNE 15, 2017. P.C. : . Not on board. In view of urgency, taken on production board. In Civil Application NO. 1292 of 2017 2] Heard learned counsel applicant as well as the respondent in an application seeking amendment. On due consideration, the application is allowed. 3] Necessary amendment to be carried out within one week. In Writ Petition No. 6289 of 2017 4] Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission. Issue notice to the respondents. Steps to be taken within two weeks. Learned counsel for respondent No.5 waives notice. 5] Till the next date of hearing, there shall be interim order in terms of prayer clause (b) of the civil application, which reads thus: "b) That pending the hearing of this Application, the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to stay the the effect, operation, implementation and execution of the letter no. T-2/CBR/PKMS/ RECOVERY dated 25.05.2017 issued by Smt. B.Renuka, Assistant Personnel Officer, Recovery Section, Department of Construction, Services & Estate Management, Department of Atomic Energy and Government of India which is at Exhibit "D",until further orders; copy from page 13 6] List on 11th July 2017. (M. S. SONAK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)

Order - Status 9: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6289 OF 2017 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders None present. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDLI) Date : 11 JULY 2017 One week time i.e. 18.07.2017 is granted to supply copies of petition. If copies are supplied within time, issue notice to Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and 6 returnable within six weeks i.e. 22.08.2017 from today. REGISTRAR (JUDLI) RJ I gpj / 11.07.2017

Order - Status 11: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6289 OF 2017 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Advocate Swapnil Kamble instructed by A.D. Shetty for Petitioner is present. Advocate Suyash Sule instructed by George A.A., Advocate for Respondent No. 5 is present. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDL­I) Date : 22 AUGUST 2017 One week time i.e. 29.08.2017 is granted for supply of copies of petition. If copies are supplied within time, issue notice to Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and 6 returnable within six weeks i.e. 03.10.2017 from today. REGISTRAR (JUDLI) RJ I gpj / 22.08.2017

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6289 OF 2017 Pradeep Kumar M.s. ....Petitioner V/S Central Industrial Security Force (cisf) And Ors. ....Respondent Ashok D. Shetty For Petitioner Garge Aniruddha Arun for R.no. 5 CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA & MANISH PITALE, JJ DATE : 30th October, 2017 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the respondent, Stand over to 06/11/2017. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6289 OF 2017 Pradeep Kumar M.s. ....Petitioner V/S Central Industrial Security Force (cisf) And Ors. ....Respondent Ashok D. Shetty For Petitioner Y.S. Bhate a/w Garge Aniruddha Arun Res.No. 5 & 6. S.b.Kalel, AGP for state. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA & MANISH PITALE, JJ DATE : 6th November, 2017 P.C. : Office to verify and place before appropriate bench. Stand Over to 13/11/2017. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 17: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6289 OF 2017 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders None present. CORAM :A.N. MARE REGISTRAR (JUDLI) Date : 04 JANUARY 2018 Await service to Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 for five weeks i.e. 08.02.2018. S.O. to 09.02.2018. REGISTRAR (JUDLI) RJ I gpj / 04.01.2018

Order - Status 19: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6289 OF 2017 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders None for Petitioner Niranjan Kulkarni i/b Garge Anirudha Arun for R.No. 5 is present. CORAM : AJIT N. MARE REGISTRAR (JUDLI) Date : 9th FEBRUARY 2018 Petitioner to take appropriate steps for effective service on R.No. 2. S.O. three weeks i.e. 05/03/2018 REGISTRAR (JUDLI) RJI/GCI/09.02.2018

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6289 OF 2017 Pradeep Kumar M.s. ....PETITIONER V/S Central Industrial Security Force (cisf) And Ors. ...RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 15th April, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 19/08/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 25: TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 6289 OF 2017 Pradeep Kumar M.S. … Petitioner. V/s. Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) and Others … Respondents. Mr. Aditya R. Deolekar i/b. Mr.Ashok D. Shetty for the Petitioner. Mr.Y.S.Bhate with Mr.Aniruddha A. Garge for the Respondents. …... …... CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR, AND M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 19 August 2024. P.C. : The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that instructions have been received to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.303 OF 2009 IN APPLICATION NO.4486 OF 2008 Ashutosh Dnyaneshwar Agashe Vs. State of Mah) Office Notes, Office Court's Court's or Judge's orders. s orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Nr 01 0 0 1 Mr. Shirish Gupte, Sr. Counsel, with Mr S.V.Kotwal Advocate, for the applicant. Mrs.P.P.Shinde, APP, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 07/07/2009 PC: Heard Mr. Shirish Gupte, learned senior counsel for the applicant and Mrs Shinde, learned APP, for the respondent. By this application, the applicant is seeking relaxation of the condition imposed by this court vide order dated 30.1.2009 in Criminal Application No. 4486 of 2008. By this order, the applicant was directed not to leave the city of Pune without seeking permission of the court. Mr Gupte, learned senior counsel for the applicant, submits that such condition was imposed because his presence for interrogation was required at that stage and some other accused were to be arrested. He submits that his presence for interrogation is not required since the investigation, insofar as the present applicant is concerned, is almost over. The learned APP does not dispute this submission and submits that she has no objection for allowing the applicant to leave the city of Pune once in a week with prior intimation to the police. In the circumstances, I pass the following order. The applicant is allowed to leave the city of Pune once in a week with prior intimation to the police. Rest of the order dated 30.1.2009 remains unaltered. The application is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) 2

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5645 OF 2009 Mahesh Vasant Borse ..Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & anr. ..Respondents None for the petitioner Mr.S.N.Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 & 2 CORAM : S.B.MHASE & R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATE : 2ND SEPTEMBER,2009 P.C. . The matter pertains to the recruitment of the Police Constable. The petitioner has undergone the Selection Process and was not selected. Thereafter, he has filed this Writ Petition. The grievance of the petitioner is that he belongs to Other Backward Class Category and also possesses Non Creamylayer Certificate. His case should have been considered by the respondents in Other Backward Class Category. The respondents have filed an Affidavit in this respect and it is stated that at the time of the scrutiny of the document, the petitioner had not possessed Non Creamylayer Certificate and therefore, the petitioner had agreed to the inclusion of his name in the Open Category. Accordingly, he has given a statement to that effect. Therefore, he was considered in the Open Category. We, therefore, do not find any merit in the above Writ Petition. The above Writ Petition is accordingly rejected. ( R.M.SAVANT, J.) ( S.B.MHASE, J. )

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.8907 OF 2007 : Office Notes, Office Memoranda of coram, appearances, Court's orders : or directions and Registrar's orders. : Court's or Judge's orders. : : : None for the petitioner. None for the respondent. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 6TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. : . Since morning this matter has been called out twice and on both occasions none appears for the petitioners. In the circumstances, I am constrained to dismiss this petition for non prosecution. Order accordingly. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4622 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. ........ OF 2005 State of Maharashtra .... Applicant Vs. Bharat Narayan Patil & Ors. .... Respondents Ms A.S. Pai, APP, for the Applicant. Shri Sudatta Patil for the Respondents. CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & Smt. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: JULY 04, 2007 P.C: Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. Taking into consideration the medical evidence as well as the testimony of the eye-witnesses to the incident, prima facie it appears that the accused exceeded in the exercise of their private defence and, therefore, the matter requires consideration. Hence, leave is granted in terms of Section 378(3) of the Cr.P.C. in filing the appeal against the impugned judgment dated 24-2-2005 passed in Sessions Case No.151 of 2001 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli. Accordingly, the appeal stands admitted. Action under Section 390 of the Cr.P.C. to follow. (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/J7cag4622.5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.222 OF 2005 Babasaheb Ramrao Patil .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents Shri Jay Shekhar for the Petitioner. Ms A.S. Pai, APP, for the State. Shri Sudatta Patil for the Respondents Nos.2 to 5. CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & Smt. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: JULY 04, 2007 P.C: In view of the Appeal filed by the prosecution against the impugned judgment having been admitted, question of entertaining the present revision application does not arise. The revision application, therefore, is dismissed. (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/J7cag4622.5