All Civil Miscellaneous Application

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4184 OF 2005 Nivruti Applicant. Pundalik Waghmare. Versus. The Respondent. State of Maharashtra. Shri G.M.Savagave for the Applicant. Ms.M.M.Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATED : 11th July, 2005. P.C.: Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the parties. The prayer in this Application is for modification of Condition (d) incorporated in the order dated 25th February 2005. Grievance of the Applicant is that from February 2005 till today the charge sheet is not filed and as a result thereof the Applicant is required to go to the Police Station every Monday. There is substance in the grievance made by the Applicant and said condition needs to be suitably modified. Hence the Application is disposed of by passing following order: (i)Condition (d) in order dated 25th February 2005 is modified and will now read as under: "The Applicant shall report to Sadar Bazar Police Station on every first Monday of every calender month between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m. till filing of the charge sheet." (ii)Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order. Judge.

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2559 OF 2007 Mr.Ravindra M.Vaity and Anr. ..Applicants Vs. Deepak R.Shinde and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.K.S.Patil advocate for Applicants Ms.A.T.Jhaveri A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : FEBRUARY 18, 2008 P.C. Heard both sides. The applicants-original accused have preferred this application for setting aside the order dated 2.4.2007 passed by the learned Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 8th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai in C.C.No. 19/M/2006. By the said order, the learned Magistrate referred the said case under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. to the Senior Police Inspector, Andheri Police Station for investigation and report. The learned APP on instructions states that the police have investigated the said case and thereafter they have submitted report to the Magistrate for grant of "B" Summary. In this view of the matter, I see no reason to entertain the present application. However, liberty is given to the applicants to challenge the order of the Magistrate on the application for "B" Summary, if adverse to them. It is made clear that this application is being disposed of without entering into the merits of the matter. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.325 OF 2009 Hemant Digamber Pawar 2. Sandeep @ Balya Rajbali Manohar ...Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent --- Shri Teja Katdhare for Applicants Shri S.S. Pednekar APP for State ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 3RD FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants and the learned APP for the State. The Applicants are arrested in connection with an offence punishable under sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 302, 324,504 of the Indian Penal Code registered at Kolshewadi Police Station, Kalyan (East),Dist. Thane on 20.3.2008. The chargesheet has been filed. It is alleged that the Applicants along with others had assaulted the Complainant and others with sticks and, as a result, one Gopal Dhumal had received injuries and he thereafter, succumbed to the injuries on 22.3.2008. In the first information, it has been stated that some unknown persons have assaulted the deceased and others. Perusal of the material, which is on record shows that there are contradictions in respect of the statements of eye witnesses. Exact number of persons, who had assaulted the complainant and others differs from witness to witness. No specific role, otherwise, has been attributed to the present Applicants. Applicants have not been identified by the Complainant since no identification parade has been held by the Investigating Officer. Under these circumstances, in my view, prima facie case is made out for grant of bail. The Applicants be released on bail in a sum of Rs.5,000/- each with one or two sureties in the like amount. The Applicants shall report to the Koleshwadi Police Station, Kalyan (East), Dist. Thane once in a month. Application is disposed of. V.M. KANADE J.

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 721 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2011 The State of Maharashtra : Applicant. versus Ravindra Vitthal Gharat & ors. : Respondents. Mr P S Hingorani APP for the Applicant/State. COR CORAM : NARESH H PATIL & K U CHANDIWAL, JJ DAT Е: DATE : O7TH JULY 2011 P.C. 1 Heard. Perused the impugned judgment and the deposition of the witnesses placed on record by the learned APP. 2 Leave to file appeal is granted. Appeal is Admitted. 3 Action under Section 390 of the Criminal Procedure Code be taken. (K U CHANDIWAL, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.)

Order - Status 6: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 357 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. Nitin Sejpal, advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.H. Yadav, APP for State. CORAM :SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV , J DATE :JULY 8, 2015 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant. Issue notice to respondents. Learned APP waives service for respondent No. 5. Notice returnable on 5/8/2015. Private service permitted. ( SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV , J) ..... Talwalkar 1/1

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 357 OF 2015 Srushti Satish Patel ....Applicant V/S Satish Manilal Pateland Ors ....Respondent CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J DATE : 19th December, 2016 P.C. : Due to paucity of time Stand over to 20/01/2017. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 18: 34.APPLN.357.15.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.357 OF 2015 Srushti Satish Patel … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents Smt. Pooja Sejpal, i/by Nitin Sejpal for the Applicant. Mr. S.S. Hulke, APP for the Applicant – State. CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 15th JANUARY 2018 P.C.: This is an application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent No.1 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, Gr.Mumbai in ABA/1077/2015 by its Order dated 21.05.2015. Learned APP on instructions submitted that in the present case after completion of investigation, police have submitted chargesheet on 24.08.2017. In view of the decision of this Court in the case of Priyanka Pakvasa V/s. Sameer Pakvasa and Anr. in Criminal Application No.733/2014 in ABA No.1785/2014 dated 25.01.2016 the present application for cancellation of bail on merits after filing of chargesheet does not survive and is accordingly disposed off. (A.S.GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.48 OF 2015 Pritam Shivshankar Yadav $V/s$ The State of Maharashtra ... Applicant .... Respondent None for the Applicant. Mr. H.J. Dedhia, A.P.P., for the Respondent-State. CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.J. DATE : $6^{TH}$ FEBRUARY, 2015. $P.C.$ : In the light of the reliefs prayed for by the Applicant in this application and also in the light of the fact that Civil Writ Petition No.9244 of 2014 is pending before the learned Single Judge of this Court, this application be placed before the learned Single Judge of this Court. This application, therefore, be removed from our board. [DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] $1/1$ Dixit

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL / CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE: 20 NOVEMBER 2015 P.C . :- On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on Supplementary and Daily Boards stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CMIS. Sr. Nos. C.M.I.S. Date 122, 128, 130, 131, 140, 153 11.12.2015 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 119, 120, 121, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 139, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 154, 156 11.12.2015 114, 115, 116, 117, 132, 155 14.12.2015 134, 138 15.12.2015 101, 160, 161, 162 23.12.2015 118, 133, 136, 137, 157, 158, 159 04.01.2016 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 14 18.01.2016 15, 16, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 19.01.2016 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 20.01.2016 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49, 50, 51 21.01.2016 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 22.01.2016 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86 25.01.2016 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 27.01.2016 If in any of the above matters, ad-interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If ad-interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. (M. S. SONAK, J.)

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL/CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : JANUARY 29, 2016 P. C. : On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on Supplementary and Daily Boards stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CMIS. Sr. Nos. C.M.I.S. Date Supplementary Board :­ 923, 925, 926, 927, 928. 12/02/16 (On Supplementary Board) Daily Board :­ 1, 3, 4. 08/02/16 Daily Board :­ 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25. 04/03/16 26, 27, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51. 11/03/16 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102. 18/03/16 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130. 01/04/16 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150. 08/04/16 If in any of the above matters, adinterim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If adinterim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. (M. S. SONAK, J.)

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 48 OF 2015 Pritam Shivshankar Yadav … Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent … None for the Applicant. Ms. M. R. Tidke, APP for the State. CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE :20 AUGUST, 2016 P.C. : The Family Court at Bandra, is directed to dispose of Case No. E-406/2010 as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of 1 year from today. This is if the said case has not already been disposed of by now. By the aforesaid direction, the present application is disposed of. Ms. Tidke the learned Additional Public Prosecutor undertakes to communicate this order to the Principle Judge, Family Court, at Bandra within a period of 2 weeks from today. 3. All concerned to act on the basis of authenticated copy of this order. (M. S. SONAK, J.)

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.171 OF 2008 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (STAMP) NO.15932 OF 2008 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court's or Judge's orders. coram, appearances, Court's orders : or directions and Registrar's : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr.V.S.Kapse for the appellant. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ DATED: 15th July, 2008. P.C.: . Heard Mr.Kapse, learned counsel for the applicant-husband. Issue notice to the respondent-wife, returnable after ten weeks. In addition, to normal mode of service, Mr.Kapse is at liberty to issue advocate's notice to the respondent but under Registered Post A.D and shall also file affidavit of service on the next date. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Civil Application No.171 of 2008 In Family Court Appeal Stamp No.15932 of 2008 Mr.Vinay Applicant Prahaladrai Poddar Vs. Mrs.Rachana Respondent Vinay Poddar Mr.Abhijit V. Rane i/b. Mr.V.S. Kapse for applicant. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. September 23, 2008. P.C. .Heard Mr.Rane holding for Mr.Kapse, the learned counsel for the applicant - husband. The notice issued to the respondent - wife has been returned by the postal authorities with the remark "Refused" and the postal envelope is placed on record. .This is an application praying for condonation of delay caused in filing Family Court Appeal under Stamp No.15932 of 2008. .As per the office note the appeal is beyond time by 64 days and we are satisfied that the delay caused deserves to be condoned subject to payment of costs. .Hence the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to payment of costs quantified at Rs.500/- and to be remitted to the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority within two weeks from today. .List the appeal for admission on 13th October (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4622 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. ........ OF 2005 State of Maharashtra .... Applicant Vs. Bharat Narayan Patil & Ors. .... Respondents Ms A.S. Pai, APP, for the Applicant. Shri Sudatta Patil for the Respondents. CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & Smt. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: JULY 04, 2007 P.C: Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. Taking into consideration the medical evidence as well as the testimony of the eye-witnesses to the incident, prima facie it appears that the accused exceeded in the exercise of their private defence and, therefore, the matter requires consideration. Hence, leave is granted in terms of Section 378(3) of the Cr.P.C. in filing the appeal against the impugned judgment dated 24-2-2005 passed in Sessions Case No.151 of 2001 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli. Accordingly, the appeal stands admitted. Action under Section 390 of the Cr.P.C. to follow. (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/J7cag4622.5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.222 OF 2005 Babasaheb Ramrao Patil .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents Shri Jay Shekhar for the Petitioner. Ms A.S. Pai, APP, for the State. Shri Sudatta Patil for the Respondents Nos.2 to 5. CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & Smt. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: JULY 04, 2007 P.C: In view of the Appeal filed by the prosecution against the impugned judgment having been admitted, question of entertaining the present revision application does not arise. The revision application, therefore, is dismissed. (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/J7cag4622.5