All Bail Application

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1160 OF 2017 Isakivelu Pechhimuttu Nadar And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J DATE : 5th June, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 14/06/2017. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. BAIL APPLICATION NO.1160 OF 2017 Isakivelu Pechhimuttu Nadar & Ors. .. Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent …... Ms. Vinaya Padwal, Advocate for the Applicants. Mrs. J. S. Lohokare, APP for the Respondent – State. …... CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATED : JUNE 14, 2017. P.C. : Learned advocate for the applicants on instructions submits that the applicants have been released on bail by the trial Court. She, therefore, seeks withdrawal of this application. The application is allowed to be withdrawn. Bail Application is disposed of as withdrawn. ( PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 899 OF 2019 Akash Vinayak Choudhari ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 25th June, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to 17/07/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 899 OF 2019 Akash Vinayak Choudhari ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 17th July, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Stand over to 23/07/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 899 OF 2019 Akash Vinayak Choudhari ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 23rd July, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to 08/08/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 899 OF 2019 Akash Vinayak Choudhari ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 8th August, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to 06/09/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 899 OF 2019 Akash Vinayak Choudhari ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 6th September, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 23/09/2019 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 899 OF 2019 Akash Vinayak Choudhari Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra Respondent Raju more i/b.Nitesh Jaywant Mohite For Applicant A.A.Takalkar App for State CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 23rd September, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the petitioners / respondent / applicant , Stand over to 30/09/2019 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 899 OF 2019 Akash Vinayak Choudhari ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 30th September, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 01/10/2019 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 20: spb/ 901ba899-19.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 899 OF 2019 Akash Vinayak Choudhari… Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent. Mr. Deepak R. More, Advocate, i/by Nitesh J. Mohite for the Applicant. Smt. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the State/Respondent. (Mr. S.L. Nanvare, PSI to Loni Kalbhor Police Station, Pune is present.). CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : OCTOBER 01, 2019. PC : 1 After arguing for some time, when I expressed my disinclination to grant relief, the learned counsel for the Applicant prays for withdrawal of this Application. Prayer is granted. 2 Application is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of as such. ….. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J**.**)

Order - Status 11: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.1032 OF 2011 Noormohammed Hasan Bepari .Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.J.B.Kocheta i/b. Mr.S.M.Bhalghat & Mr.P.D.Purway, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.F.E.Saldanha, Special Public Prosecutor, for NCB Mrs.A.A.Mane, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 22ND SEPTEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. On being indicated that the application would not be granted, the learned Counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw Bail Application. Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn. Bail Application is disposed of as withdrawn. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore ..Applicant v/s. The State of Maharashtra . ..Respondents Ms. Sheetal Gaikar i/b. Tushar Sonawane for the Applicant. Mr. A.A.Palkar, APP for the State. CORAM : ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED : 26th AUGUST, 2022. P.C. Issue Notice to Respondent No.2. Learned APP to make an endeavor to intimate the next date of hearing to the Respondent No.2, through the officer of the concerned police station. Stand over to 13.09.2022. (ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Shri. Tushar Sonawane for Applicant. Shri. A. A. Palkar, APP for the State. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAKASH D. NAIK J DATE : 11th October, 2022 P.C. : Await service. Stand over to 20/10/2022. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and anr. ...Respondents Mr. Tushar Sonawane for the Applicant. Mr. V. B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the State. $cdots cdots cdots$ $cdots cdots cdots$ CORAM: N.R. BORKAR, J. DATED : 20 OCTOBER 2022 $P.C. :=$ The Investigating Officer shall intimate about the filing of the present application and the next date of hearing of the application to the respondent No. 2. $2.$ Stand over to 16 November 2022. $(N.R. BORKAR, J.)$

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Mr. V. B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for Respondent-State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR J DATE : 16th November, 2022 P.C. : S. O. to 05/12/2022 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore Applicant v/s. The State of Maharashtra ••• Respondent Mr. Tushar Sonawane for the Applicant. Mr. V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the State. Mr. Ravi Rajulwar, API, Sangola Police Station, Solapur. CORAM : R.N.LADDHA, J. DATE : 5 th December 2022 P.C. : The Investigating Officer is directed to inform the first informant about filing of the present application within a week. Stand over to 15 th December 2022. (R.N. LADDHA, J) Lata Panjwani, P.S.

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore Versus The State of Maharashtra Applicant. Respondent Mr. Tushar Sonawane, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the State. Mr. Ashish Satpute, Legal Aid Counsel appointed. CORAM : R. N. Laddha, J. DATE: 15 th December 2022 Digitally signed by LATA SUNIL SUNIL PANJWANI PANJWANI Date: 2022.12.16 11:15:15 +0530 P.C.: Learned APP informs this Court that the Applicant is not in a position to engage private Advocate and requests to provide legal aid. Mr.Ashish Satpute, Counsel from the Legal Aid Panel is appointed as Advocate to espouse the cause of the Applicant. Office is directed to serve a copy of the Application to the learned counsel appointed on behalf of the Applicant. Page No. 1 of 2 15 th December 2022 36 ba 1685.22.docx Stand over to 9 th January 2023. (R. N. LADDHA, J.) L.S.Panjwani, P.S. Page No. 2 of 2 15 th December 2022

Order - Status 15: ba 1685.22 speaking.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore Versus The State of Maharashtra Applicant. Respondent CORAM : R. N. Laddha, J. (IN CHAMBER) DATE: 5 th January 2023 P.C.: The matter is taken in chamber suo moto. In Paragraphs 1 & 2 of the order dated 15 th December 2022, wherever the words 'Applicant' is there, it be replaced by words 'Respondent No.2'. The order dated 15 th December 2022 stands corrected accordingly. (R. N. LADDHA, J.) L.S.Panjwani, P.S. Page No. 1 of 1 15 th December 2022

Order - Status 17: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT Mr. Tushar Sonawane a/w Pooja Satpute for Applicant. Ms. A. A. Takalkar, APP for State. Mr. Amit Icham i/b Ashish Satpute for Complainant. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 8th February, 2023 P.C. : S. O. to 15/02/2023 ( H. O. B.). ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT Mr. Tushar Sonawane a/w Pooja Satpute for Applicant. Ms. A. A. Takalkar, APP for State. Mr. Ashish Satpute for Respondent No. 2 CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 15th February, 2023 P.C. : S. O. to 17/02/2023 ( H. O. B.). ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 22: Urmila Ingale 22.ba 1685.22.doc URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Digitally signed by URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Date: 2023.02.17 14:22:07 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore ...Applicant VS. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr. Tushar Sonawane a/w Ms.Pooja Satpute, for the Applicant. Ms. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the State. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 17, 2023 P.C. : The matter to come up in due course. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore ..Applicant $v/s$ . The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent Mr. Tushar Sonawane for the Applicant. Mr. Ashish Satpute for the Respondent No.2 Mrs. A.A.Takalkar, APP for the State. CORAM : ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED : $13 th $ APRIL, 2023. $P.C.$ $1.$ This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. filed by the aforesaid Applicant, who is facing trial in Special Case No.7 of 2021 pending before the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Pandharpur. The said case arises from Crime No. 10 of 2022, registered with Sangola Police Station for the offences under Section 354, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4, 8, 12 and 42 of the Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences Act. $2.$ Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.2 and learned APP for the State. I have perused PRASANNA P SALGAONKAR the records and considered the submissions advanced by the learned Digitally signed by PRASANNÄ‚ P SALGAONKAR Date: 2023.04.18 10:37:49 p +0530 Counsels for the respective parties. The aforesaid crime was registered pursuant to the FIR lodged by the mother-in-law of the victim. She has stated that on 04.01.2022 she had gone in search of the victim, who had gone to wash clothes near the rivulet (Odha). She saw the Applicant pulling the victim by her hand and heard the victim crying for help. She has stated that she had also heard the Applicant threatening her not to shout. When she intervened the Applicant left the victim and ran away from the spot. Based on the said report, initially crime was registered under Section 354, 506 of IPC and Section 12 of the POCSO Act. Statement of the victim was recorded. The victim claimed that the Applicant had touched her chest and private parts. On the basis of the allegations made by the victim, Section 4 and 8 also came to be added. It is to be noted that though the Applicant is charged for committing offences under Section 4 of the POCSO Act, the statement of the victim does not prima facie indicate that the Applicant had committed penetrative sexual assault. In such circumstances, in my considered view, prima facie, the offence under Section 4 of not made out. The maximum sentence in respect of other offences is five years. The Applicant was arrested on 04.01.2022 and is presently in Judicial Custody. Considering the large pendency, the trial is not likely to commence in the near future. The application filed by the Applicant has been rejected mainly on the ground of antecedents of the Applicant. Learned Counsel for the Applicant states that the Applicant shall not visit Sangola District, Solapur, till the evidence of the victim is recorded. Considering the above facts and circumstances, in my considered view, this would be a fit case, to exercise discretion under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in favour of the Applicant. Hence the application is allowed on the following terms and conditions:- (i) The Applicant who is facing trial in Special Case No.7 of 2021 pending before the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Pandharpur arising out of Crime No. Crime No. 10 of 2022, registered with Sangola Police Station, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twentyfive Thousand Only) with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount; (ii) The Applicant shall not visit Sangola District till the evidence of the victim is recorded. (iii) The Applicant shall report to the nearest police station on the first Monday of every month till the date of framing of charge; (iv) The Applicant shall not interfere with the complainant or the other witnesses, or tamper with the evidence in any manner; (v) The Applicant shall keep the Special Court as well as the Investigating Officer informed of his permanent as well as temporary address, and his contact details, and/or change of residence or mobile details from time to time. (ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1318 OF 2018 Sudarshan Rajkumar Badguzar Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Anand Jondhale i/b Jondhale and Co. for Applicant Ms.Veera Shinde - APP for State CORAM : SMT. S.S. JADHAV, J DATE : 7th June, 2018 P.C. : Learned APP waives service and seeks time to take instructions. Time as prayed for is granted. Stand over to 14/06/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1318 OF 2018 Sudarshan Rajkumar Badguzar ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. S.S. JADHAV, J DATE : 14th June, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Stand over to 19/06/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1318 OF 2018 Sudarshan Rajkumar Badguzar ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. S.S. JADHAV, J DATE : 19th June, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Stand over to 11/07/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1317 OF 2018 Ashok Devram Patil ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1318 OF 2018 Sudarshan Rajkumar Badguzar ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1319 OF 2018 Kundan Mukund Khanvilkar Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1320 OF 2018 Pavan Ramchandra Kachre ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1321 OF 2018 Rohit Sunil Borse ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr.Anand Jondhle a/w Ms.Yashoda Jondhale a/w Mr.Babu Singh i/b Jondhale And Co For Applicant Ms.Veera Shinde - APP for State CORAM : SMT. S.S. JADHAV, J DATE : 25th June, 2018 P.C. : At the request of learned APP for State, Stand over to 12/07/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM : P. N. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 20nd JULY 2016. P.C. : On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on daily and supplementary board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CMIS. S.N. Case No. CMIS DATE 2 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1583/2015 07/09/2016 3 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1748/2015 07/09/2016 4 BAIL APPLICATION NO.69/2016 07/09/2016 5 BAIL APPLICATION NO.291/2016 07/09/2016 6 BAIL APPLICATION NO.331/2016 07/09/2016 8 BAIL APPLICATION NO.750/2016 07/09/2016 9 BAIL APPLICATION NO.907/2016 07/09/2016 10 BAIL APPLICATION NO.916/2016 07/09/2016 11 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1084/2016 07/09/2016 12 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1085/2016 07/09/2016 13 BAIL APPLICATION NO.41/2016 07/09/2016 14 BAIL APPLICATION NO.316/2016 07/09/2016 15 BAIL APPLICATION NO.427/2016 07/09/2016 17 BAIL APPLICATION NO.841/2016 07/09/2016 18 BAIL APPLICATION NO.952/2016 07/09/2016 19 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1027/2016 07/09/2016 20 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1029/2016 07/09/2016 21 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1037/2016 07/09/2016 22 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1090/2016 07/09/2016 24 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1158/2016 07/09/2016 25 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1394/2016 07/09/2016 26 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.687/2016 07/09/2016 In the above matters, adinterim relief or interim relief, if any, is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. (P. N. DESHMUKH, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1029 OF 2016 Kamlesh Parsram Balani Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr. Satyavrat Joshi Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. R.M. Gadhvi, A.P.P. for the Respondent State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J. DATED : 8th SEPTEMBER, 2016. P.C. : 1 This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for bail in C.R. No.I/222/2015 dated 02.07.2015 registered with Vitthalwadi Police Station, District Thane, under sections 363, 366, 376 (2)(j), (2)(n) of Indian Penal Code and under sections 3, 4, 5(l) and 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. 2 The First Information Report is lodged by the mother of victim girl Smt. Ambica Mane, on 02.07.2015. On the basis of the said report, the aforesaid First Information Report is lodged by the Police. During the course of investigation, the statement of the victim girl, who was at that relevant time about 16 years of age is recorded on 08.07.2015. That the statement of the victim girl, under section 164 of Cr.P.C. is also recorded by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, 6th Court, Ulhasnagar, on 27.07.2015. The applicant was arrested on 5th July 2015. That after completion of the investigation, the police have submitted chargesheet on 14.09.2015. 3 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. also perused the entire chargesheet annexed to the present application. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that a bare perusal of the statement of the victim girl recorded under section 161 so also under section 164 of Cr.P.C. would reveal that the alleged act has contemplated under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code was a Consensual act. Prima facie I find substance in the said submission. It is to be noted here that the victim girl who was at the relevant time aged about 16 years, had stayed with the applicant at the place of the aunt of the applicant for about 18 to 20 days. It prima facie appears form the evidence available on record that the victim girl had attained the age of understanding on the date of registration of offence and at her free will had accompanied the applicant at various places. 4 In view of the above, the applicant has made out a case for his release of bail. 5 Hence the following order : (i) The applicant be released on bail in C.R. No.I/222/2015 registered with Vitthalwadi Police Station, District Thane, on his furnishing P.R. bond of Rs.25,000/ with one or more local sureties in the like amount. (ii) After his release from the jail, the applicant shall not enter the jurisdiction of Vitthalwadi Police Station except for marking his presenty as is directed herein below. (iii) After his release from the jail, the applicant shall attend the Vitthalwadi Police Station once in three months on every 1st Monday of the said month between 11.00 a.m.to 1.00 p.m. (iv) Before his release from the jail, the applicant shall provide the documents pertaining to the address where he intends to reside after his release from jail. (v) Any two consecutive defaults in complying with the aforestated conditions, shall attract the provisions of cancellation of bail. (vi) Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1405 OF 2019 Asif Mohd. Mamtule ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 26th July, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time ,stand over to 21/08/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1405 OF 2019 Asif Mohd. Mamtule ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 23rd August, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time ,stand over to 19/09/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1405 OF 2019 Asif Mohd. Mamtule .Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr. Aniket Vagal, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr. P. H. Gaikwad-Patil, APP, for the Respondent – State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 19.09.2019 P.C. . Learned counsel for the Applicant seeks time to file an Affidavit of the Applicant. Accordingly, the Superintendent, Taloja Central Jail to permit the Applicant to affirm the Affidavit before him or any other authorized officer, in accordance with the rules. Stand over to 14.10.2019 . All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 13: shailaja IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1405 OF 2019 Asif Mohd. Mamtule ] Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ] Respondent ….. ….. Mr. Aniket Vagal, for the Applicant. Mr. A.A. Patkar, A.P.P for the Respondent - State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 14th OCTOBER, 2019. P.C. : After arguing for some time, when the Court was not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail, learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw this application. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn. Having regard to the age of of the victim boy i.e 8 years, trial of the Applicant is expedited, lest the victim boy forgets the incident due to passage of time. The learned trial Judge to dispose of the Applicant's case as expeditiously as possible and in any event, within six months from the date of receipt of this order. Application is disposed of. All the concerned to act upon the authenticated copy of this order. [REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1257 OF 2017 Ramesh Bhimrao Dubale Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Rahul Kadam, i/b Mr.Mr.M.J.Pathan, for the Applicant. Mr.S. H. Yadav, A.P.P for the Respondent-State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 20th JUNE, 2017 P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this application, the Applicant seeks his enlargement on bail in connection with C.R.No.94 of 2016 registered with the Samarth Police Station, Pune for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 3, 4 and 7 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the said case. He submitted that the applicant was about 18 years at the relevant time. 4. Learned APP opposed the application. Perused the papers. The complainant is the mother of the prosecutrix. The prosecutrix was about 5 years of age at the relevant time. She has stated that the applicant took her to his house and committed forcible intercourse with her. The incident has taken place on 25th May, 2016 at about 11.00 a.m. and the FIR was lodged on 27th May, 2016. The medical history given to the Doctor is consistent with the prosecutrix's statements recorded under Sections 161 and 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The opinion of the medical doctor shows that there was evidence of torn hymen with peritymenal inflammation which is suggestive of vaginal penetration with no evidence of any injury on any part of the body. Considering the material on record, prima-facie, this is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant on bail. Hence, the Application for bail is rejected and disposed of as such. However, the trial of the applicant is expedited keeping in mind the age of the prosecutrix and not the age of the applicant. It is made clear that the observations made herein are prima facie for deciding the aforesaid application, and the learned Judge shall decide the case on its own merits, in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.2501 OF 2021 Sagar @ Sangpal Gulabrao Jamnik ] Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra ] Respondent Ms. Mayuri Hatle, for the Applicant. Smt.Rutuja Abmekar, APP for the State. CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE, J DATE : 12th OCTOBER, 2022. P.C. 1] Since the offences invoke against the Applicant are under the provisions of POCSO Act, let the complainant be added as party-Respondent No.2. 2] After necessary amendment is being carried out, Issue notice to Respondent No.2 returnable on 29.11.2022. 3] Let the learned APP intimate the complainant through the Investigating Officer about her impleadment in the application and also apprise her of her right of being represented through counsel of her choice or through legal aid. [BHARATI DANGRE, J]

Order - Status 6: Urmila Ingale IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Digitally signed by URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Date: 2022.11.30 10:52:53 +0530 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2501 OF 2021 Mr. Sagar @ Sang Pal Gulabrao Jamnik ..Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Ms. Mayuri D. Hatl,e for applicant. Ms. P.N. Dabholkar, APP for respondent-State. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 29, 2022 P.C. : 1. The Learned APP submits that the complainant has been served and she wants to be represented through legal aid. Mr. Akshay Pai is requested to appear on behalf of the complainant and represent her. 2. List the matter on 06/12/2022. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 2501 OF 2021 Sagar @ Sang Pal Gulabrao Jamnik APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 6th December, 2022 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 16/12/2022 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 2501 OF 2021 Sagar @ Sang Pal Gulabrao Jamnik ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT Ms. Mayuri D. Hatle for Applicant. Ms. G. P. Mulekar, APP for State. Mr. Akshay Pai for Respondent No. 2 CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 16th December, 2022 P.C. : S. O. to 20/12/2022 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 2501 OF 2021 Sagar @ Sang Pal Gulabrao Jamnik APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 20th December, 2022 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 05/01/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.2501 OF 2021 SAGAR @ SANGPAL GULABRAO JAMNIK ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ..RESPONDENTS ------------ Ms. Mayuri D. Hatle for the applicant. Mr. Akshay Pai for respondent No.2. Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for the State. ------------ CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : JANUARY 5, 2023. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application. A request is made to expedite the trial as the applicant is in custody since 22/09/2020. The FIR is lodged on 28/07/2020. Considering that the applicant is in custody for more than 2 years and 3 months, the trial Court is requested to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of six months from today. In any case, considering that the applicant is incarcerated for this long a period, the trial Court is requested to record the evidence of the child within a period of one month from the date when this order is produced on record. 3. Liberty to apply for bail in case the trial does not substantially proceed during the period of six months from today. 4. Subject to what is observed hereinabove, the application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of. 5. I appreciate the assistance rendered by Mr. Pai, learned advocate, who was requested to appear on behalf of the victim. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2501 OF 2021 Sagar @ Sang Pal Gulabrao Jamnik Versus...Applicant ...RespondentThe State Of Maharashtra...Respondent ____ None for the Applicant Ms. Anamika Mlahotra, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : $28^{text{th}}$ AUGUST 2023. P.C. : The letter dated 5 th July 2023 is received from District Judge-7 and Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for extension of one year time for disposal of Special (POCSO) Case No. 506/2020. Considering the reasons mentioned in the letter, one year time is extended to dispose of Special (POCSO) Case No. 506/2020. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1104 OF 2015 Rajesh Bharatbhai Rathod ... Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. Tejas Hilage, Advocate appointed ,for the applicant. Ms. R.M.Gadhavi, APP, for the State CORAM: SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV,J. DATE : 18th June, 2015. P.C . An application is received through jail. The applicant is praying for bail in Case No.370 of 2011. This Court had requested the learned counsel Shri Tejas Hilage to espouse the cause of the applicant. He has graciously accepted to do the same. Office to furnish copy of the application to the Advocate so appointed. The learned APP to take specific instructions in respect of the stage of trial. S.O. to 25.6.2015. (SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1104 OF 2015 Rajesh Bharatbhai Rathod. ... Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. None for Applicant. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for State. CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J DATE : JULY 13, 2015 P.C.: 1 Learned APP upon instructions submits that the applicant herein was taken to J.J. Hospital, Mumbai on 26/6/2015. It is reported that the applicant has been tested positive for HIV. 2 It is further submitted that the trial has commenced. The next scheduled date for recording of evidence is 27/7/2015. In view of this, the applicant does not deserve grant of bail. In the eventuality that the applicant files an application seeking bail on medical ground, Talwalkar 1/2 the learned Judge shall consider the same on its own merits. The application is accordingly disposed of. 3 Office to communicate this order to the applicant who is in jail. ( SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV , J) Talwalkar 2/2