All Arbitration Petition (uppercase variant)
Order - Status 5: SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2014 ...... Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ...Applicant Versus Lata Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant Applicant present in Court None for Respondent No.1 Ms. Usha Kejariwal, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State CORAM:- REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED :- JANUARY 31, 2014 ...... P.C. Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant. By this Application, the Applicant is challenging the order dated 5th December, 2013 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 52nd Court, Kurla, Mumbai, below Exhibit 4 in C. C. No. 189/Misc/2013, by which, her application came to be rejected, wherein she had challenged the locus standi of the Respondent No.1 to file an application under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The present Applicant is the daughter-in-law of the Respondent No.1. The Respondent No. 1 has filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, seeking reliefs under Sections 18, 21 and 22 of the said Act, and has also sought protection order apart from other reliefs. The learned Counsel for the Applicant has relied on a Judgment of the Delhi High Court in the case of Varsha Kapoor vs. Union of India & Ors. in Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 638 of 2010, in support of his contention that the term `respondent' as defined in Section 2(q), is restricted only to adult male persons while construing the expression, "a relative of the husband or the male partner." Issue notice to the respondent No.1, returnable on 11th February, 2014. Hamdust permitted. In addition to Court notice, Applicant to serve the respondent No.1 by Advocate's notice and file an affidavit of service before the returnable date. The learned Counsel for the Applicant, on the instructions of the Applicant, who is present in Court, states that she will not visit the house of respondent No.1 or create any nuisance or threaten the respondent No.1. Ad-interim stay in terms of prayer clause (c) till 12th February, 2014. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
Order - Status 7: SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2014 ...... ...... Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ...Applicant Versus Lata Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. ...Respondents Ms. Maya Upadeshe h/f Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant None for Respondent No.1 Ms. Usha Kejariwal, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State CORAM:- REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED :- FEBRUARY 12, 2014 P.C. On 31st January, 2014, notice was issued, which was made returnable on 11th February, 2014 and hamdust was permitted. However, despite the said order, the Advocate for the applicant has not supplied spare copy and hence, notice could not be issued. It is made clear that if the spare copy is not supplied within two days from today, the stay granted vide order dated 31st January, 2014 shall stand vacated. Stand over to 14th February, 2014. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
Order - Status 9: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani .Applicant V/s. Lata Srichand Sakhrani & anr. .Respondents None for the Applicant Mr.Tariq Khan, Advocate, for Respondent No.1 Mrs.U.V.Kejariwal, APP, for Respondent No.2 – State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 14TH FEBRUARY, 2014 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for respondent No.1. The learned counsel for the respondent No.1 states that he will file his Vakalatnama within one week from today. Stand over to 28-02-2014. Till then, interim relief granted vide order dated 31-01-2014 to continue. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
Order - Status 11: nsc. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.66 OF 2014 ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ Office Notes, Memorandam of appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Office Court's or Judge's orders ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ Mr.Laxman P. Kanal, for the applicant. Mr.Tariq Khan, for respondent no.1. Ms.U.V.Kejariwal, APP for the State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED : 28th February, 2014. P.C. 1. Learned Counsel for the Respondent No.1, states that he will file his reply in the Registry during the course of the day. He states that a copy of the reply has been served on the Counsel for the Applicant. On the next date, an endeavour shall be made to decide the matter finally at the stage of 2/2 18-apl.66.2014.doc admission. Stand over to 7th March, 2014. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
Order - Status 13: SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2014 ...... ...... Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ...Applicant Versus Lata Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant Mr. Tariq Khan for Respondent No.1 Ms. Usha Kejariwal, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State CORAM:- REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED :- MARCH 7, 2014 P.C. Heard Counsel for the parties. Arguable questions are raised. Admit. Mr. Khan waives service for respondent No.1. Ms. Kejariwal, A.P.P waives service for respondent No.2-State. To be listed in the 2nd week of April, 2014 at the end of the admision Board under caption `for final hearing and disposal'. There shall be an interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c). REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani .Applicant V/s. Lata Srichand Sakhrani & anr. .Respondents Mr.Laxman P. Kanal, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.Tariq Khan, Advocate, for Respondent No.1 Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP, for Respondent No.2 – State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 22ND APRIL, 2014 P.C. . By consent, stand over after vacation. Till then, interim relief granted earlier to continue. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
Order - Status 20: Osk 935-Apl-66-2014.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani … Applicant V/s. Laat Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. … Respondents Mr.Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant. Mr.S.S. Hulke, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 17th June 2022. P.C. : . At the request of learned Advocate for Applicant, stand over to 28th June 2022. [A.S. GADKARI, J.] OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Digitally signed by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date: 2022.06.20 13:04:16 +0530
Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APL NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani …..Applicant Vs. Lata Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. …..Respondents Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for the Applicant. Mr. R.M. Pethe APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 1st JULY, 2022. P.C.:- None for the Respondent No.1. In order to grant an opportunity to the Respondent No.1, stand over to 15th July, 2022. To be listed on supplementary board. (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ....APPLICANT V/S Laat Srichand Sakhrani And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr.Laxman Kalel for the Applicant. Mr. Tariq Khan for the Respondent No.-1. Mr. R.M.Pethe, APP for the Respondent - State. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI J DATE : 15th July, 2022 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the Respondent , stand over to 22/07/2022 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ....APPLICANT V/S Laat Srichand Sakhrani And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant Mrs. J. S. Lohokare APP-for State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. G. SEWLIKAR J DATE : 22nd July, 2022 P.C. : S. O. to 29/07/2022 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Order - Status 29: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ....APPLICANT V/S Laat Srichand Sakhrani And Anr ....RESPONDENT LAXMAN PRATABRAI KANAL A/W. DIVYA KANAL FOR APPLICANT YOGESH Y DABKE APP FOR STATE/RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL J DATE : 29th July, 2022 P.C. : The Registry to verify and place the matter before the appropriate Court. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
1) Document Filed: Report
Filed By : Maya S Updeshe
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 1: 12/02/2014
2) Document Filed: Vakalatnama
Advocate: Tariq Khan
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 2: 21/02/2014
Respondent-1: Laat Srichand Sakhrani
Respondent-2: Anr
Petitioner-1: Niharika Manoj Sakhrani
Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 680 OF 2024 Alka @ Laxmi Ganpat Vinchu & Anr. …..Applicants Vs. The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents Mr. Priyal Sarda for the Applicants. Mr. A.I. Satpute APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 4 th JULY, 2024. P.C.:- Issue notice to Respondent No.2 returnable on 16th August, 2024. Learned Advocate for the Applicants is directed to supply spare copies of Application in the Registry within a period of one week from today, failing which the Application shall stand dismissed without further reference to this Court. Learned Advocate for the Applicants submitted that, perusal of FIR would indicate that, the allegations against the Applicants are very general in nature. That, the Respondent No. 2 has lodged the said crime after 27 years of marriage, implicating all the family members. In view thereof, till the returnable date, ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b). ( DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 680 OF 2024 Alka @ Laxmi Ganpat Vinchu and anr. … Applicants V/s. State of Maharashtra and anr. … Respondents Ms.Seema Dighe h/f Adv. Priyal Sarda, for Applicant. Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, A.P.P. for Respondent-State. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : st 21 August 2024. P.C. : Await service of Respondent No.2. Stand over to 25th September 2024. Ad-interim relief, if any granted earlier, to continue till then. ( DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. ) URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Digitally signed by URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Date: 2024.08.27 11:35:52 +0530
Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 680 OF 2024 Alka @ Laxmi Ganpat Vinchu & Anr. …..Applicants Vs. The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents Adv. Seema S. Dighe i/by Adv. Priyal G. Sarda for the Applicants. Mr. Ashish I. Satpute APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 26 th SEPTEMBER, 2024. P.C.:- Await service of Respondent No.2. Stand over to 21st November, 2024. Ad-interim relief, if any granted earlier, to continue till the next date. ( DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR Date: 2024.10.01 13:41:57 +0530
Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 680 OF 2024 Alka @ Laxmi Ganpat Vinchu And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK & HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE, JJ DATE : 21st November, 2024 P.C. : As the Court time is over, Stand Over to 08/01/2025 Ad-interim order, if any, to continue till the next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Order - Status 12: 10:12:24 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATE :- 21st JANUARY, 2025 P.C. :- KVM At the time of rising at 5.15 p.m., the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks. Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue. The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date. Subject to the above, list these matters as under:- Serial Nos. of matters on the Board To be listed on To be listed in the category 31 to 40 04.02.2025 Fresh Admission 41 to 50 05.02.2025 Fresh Admission 52 to 58 06.02.2025 Fresh Admission 59 to 69 12.02.2025 Urgent Admission 70 to 76 13.02.2025 Urgent Admission 77 to 79 06.02.2025 Urgent Orders 80 to 100 25.02.2025 Due Admission 101 to 123 26.02.2025 Due Admission KVM (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 680 OF 2024 Alka @ Laxmi Ganpat Vinchu And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT PRIYAL G SARDA CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK, JJ DATE : 12th February, 2025 P.C. : As the Court time is over,Stand Over to 03/04/2025 Ad-interim order,if any, to continue till the next date ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM:- SARANG V. KOTWAL & S.M.MODAK, JJ. DATE:- 03rd April,2025 P.C. :- As the Court time is over, the balance board could not be taken up. Matter stand over to the dates mentioned in the chart below. Serial number of matter on board To be listed on Sr. No. 31 to 37, 39 to 40, 42 to 45 04/07/2025 Sr. No. 47 to 52, 54 to 57 07/07/2025 Sr. No. 59, 61 to 75 08/07/2025 Sr. No. 76 to 89, 91 to 95 09/07/2025 Sr. No.96,97,99,101 to 104 & 106 10/07/2025 Sr. No.108 to 115, 118 to 120, 123 & 125 11/07/2025 Sr. No. 126 to 133, 135 to 138 & 140 14/07/2025 Sr. No. 141 to 144, 146 to 158 15/07/2025 Ad-interim order,if any, to continue till the next date. (S.M.MODAK, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Seema .
Respondent-1: State Of Maharashtra
Respondent-2: Anr
Petitioner-1: Alka @ Laxmi Ganpat Vinchu
Petitioner-2: Anr
Respondent-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Respondent-2: Anr
Petitioner-1: Amit Prakash Jaste
Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Cri.Application No.64 of 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers & Anr. …… Applicants. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …... Respondents. --- Mr Jatin Karia (Shah) a/w Ms Dipti J Karia a/w Ms Snehanlata Munj a/w Ms Shraddha Kamble a/w Ms Preeti SG for the applicants. Dr Ashwini A Takalkar, APP for respondent No.1/State. --- Coram : R.N.Laddha, J. Date : 21 January 2025. P.C. : Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By a judgment and order dated 12.09.2024, the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, 70th Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai, in CC No.7002519/SS/2018, convicted applicant No.1 and 2 for the offences punishable under Sections 138 read with 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,1881 ('NI Act'). Applicant No.2 was sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for six months and pay fine of Rs.3,00,000/- Page No. 1 of 3 21 January 2025 within two months, with default stipulations. Aggrieved, the applicants filed a criminal appeal bearing No.648 of 2024 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, along with a miscellaneous application bearing No.2255 of 2024 for suspension of the sentence. By an order dated 19.11.2024, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, suspended the sentence imposed subject to the payment of 50% of the fine/compensation within 60 days. Dissatisfied, the applicants have approached this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The learned Counsel representing the applicants submits that the requirement to deposit 50% of the amount set by the Additional Sessions Judge is excessive and disproportionate, without any justification. The learned Counsel further submits that the applicants are in a financial difficulty and to show their bonafides, they are ready to deposit 20% instead of 50% of the fine/ compensation amount awarded by the Additional Sessions Judge within three weeks from today with the trial Court. Page No. 2 of 3 21 January 2025 Considering the material on record and the arguments advanced across the Bar, the sentence shall be suspended in the ad-interim subject to the applicants depositing 20% of the fine amount before the trial Court within three weeks from the date of uploading of this order. Issue notice to respondent No.2. Stand over to 24 March 2025. [ R. N. Laddha,J. ] Page No. 3 of 3 21 January 2025
Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Digitally signed by CHITRA SONAWANE Date: 2025.03.24 16:36:48 +0530 CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Cri.Application No.62 of 2025 With Cri.Application No.63 of 2025 With Cri.Application No.64 of 2025 With Cri.Application No.65 of 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers & Anr. …… Applicants. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …... Respondents. Mr Jatin P Karia (Shah) a/w Ms Snehankita M Munj and Ms Shraddha Kamble for the applicants. Ms Dr AA Takalkar, APP for respondent/State in APL/63/2025 and APL/65/2025. Mr VN Sagare, APP for State in APL/62/2025. Mr PH Gaikwad, APP for State in APL/64/2025. Mr MA Bastiri for respondent No.2. Coram : R.N.Laddha, J. Date : 24 March 2025. P.C. : The applicants to provide the copies of these applications to the learned Counsel for respondent No.2. Interim relief granted earlier shall continue to operate Page No. 1 of 2 24 March 2025 Chitra Sonawane 45-APL-62-2025.doc till the next date. Stand over to 13 June 2025. [ R. N. Laddha,J. ] Page No. 2 of 2 24 March 2025
Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 62 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 63 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 64 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 65 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR J DATE : 17th June, 2025 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 01/07/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 62 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 63 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 64 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 65 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK J DATE : 8th July, 2025 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 29/07/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
1) Document Filed: Certified Copy
Filed By : Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr
Advocate: Jatin P Karia Shah
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 1: 30/01/2025
2) Document Filed: Vakalatnama
Filed By : Chhaya Pralhad Gaikwad
Advocate: Mohammad Akram Bastivi
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 2: 04/03/2025
Respondent-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Respondent-2: Anr
Petitioner-1: Samarth Krupa Developers
Petitioner-2: Anr
Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 592 OF 2021 Sunil Shantilal Majithia ...Applicant Versus Sobha Singh @ Sobha Manoj Yadav and Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Ashok Kumar Dubey i/b SAVJ Law Solutions, for the Applicant. Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar, A.P.P for the Respondent No. 2– State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 17th AUGUST, 2021 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the applicant, stand over to 18th August 2021. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 592 OF 2021 Sunil Shantilal Majithia ...Applicant Versus Sobha Singh @ Sobha Manoj Yadav and Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Ashok Kumar Dubey i/b SAVJ Law Solutions for the Applicant. Mr. S.S.Hulke , A.P.P for the Respondent No.2-State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 18th AUGUST, 2021 P.C. : Heard learned Counsel for the applicant. Issue notice to the respondents returnable on 23rd September, 2021. Learned APP waives notice on behalf of the Respondent No.2/State. In addition to Court notice, learned Counsel for the applicant to serve the respondents by Advocate's notice and file affidavit of service before the next date. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 592 OF 2021 Sunil Shantilal Majithia .....Applicant V/s. Sobha Singh @ Sobha Manoj Yadav and anr. .....Respondents * * * * Mr. Ashok Kumar Dubey a/w. Mr. Abhinav Dubey i/by. SAVJ Law Solutions, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Manmohan A. Amonkar, Advocat for respondent no.1. Mr. S.S. Hulke, APP for State-respondent no.2. Coram : Sandeep K. Shinde, J. Tuesday, 28th September, 2021. P.C. : Admit. (Sandeep K. Shinde, J.)
Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 592 OF 2021 Sunil Shantilal Majithia Applicant Versus Sobha Singh @ Sobha Manoj Yadav And Anr. Respondents Mr. Ashok Kumar Dubey a/w Ms. Shweta Yadav i/by SAVJ Law Solutions , Advocate for the Applicant. …. None for respondent No.1. Mr. M.G.Patil, APP for the Respondent – State. …. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER, 2022. PER COURT : None appears for the respondent. The petition is circulated by the Advocate for the applicant. Vide order dated 28.09.2021, the petition is admitted. It is submitted by the Advocate for the applicant that the issue involved in this application is about dismissal of complaint on the ground of limitation. Considering the nature of issue involved in this petition, the matter will have to be heard finally. The office note indicate that the Advocate representing respondent No.1 has withdrawn his appearance. Hence, issue notice to respondent No.1, returnable on 17.10.2022. The notice may indicate that the petition would be heard finally on the next date of hearing. In addition to Court notice, the applicant is permitted to serve the Respondent No.1 by way of private notice. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) Sajakali Jamadar 1 of 1
Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 592 OF 2021 Sunil Shantilal Majithia ....APPLICANT V/S Sobha Singh @ Sobha Manoj Yadav And Anr....RESPONDENT Mr. S. S. Pednekar, APP for the State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 20th October, 2022 P.C. : S. O. to 08/12/2022 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Order - Status 15: Ghuge IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.592 OF 2021 Sunil Shantilal Majithia … Applicant V/s. Sobha Singh @ Sobha Manoj Yadav and Anr … Respondents Mr. Ashok Kumar Dubey with Aarti Kushwaha i/b SAVJ Law Solutions for the applicant. Mr. M.G. Patil, APP for the State. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : MARCH 21, 2023 P.C.: Issue fresh notice "For Final Disposal" to the respondent No.1, returnable on 2 nd May, 2023. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)
Order - Status 17: Nikita IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.592 OF 2021 Sunil Shantilal Majithia … Applicant V/s. Sobha Singh @ Sobha Manoj Yadav and Anr. … Respondents Ms. Shweta Yadav i/b SAVJ Law Solutions for the Applicant. Mr. M.G. Patil, APP for the State. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : MAY 2, 2023 P.C.: 1. Await service. 2. Stand over to 14th July 2023. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)
Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 592 OF 2021 Sunil Shantilal Majithia ....APPLICANT V/S Sobha Singh @ Sobha Manoj Yadav And Anr....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL J DATE : 14th July, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 22/08/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Order - Status 21: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 592 OF 2021 Sunil Shantilal Majithia ....APPLICANT V/S Sobha Singh @ Sobha Manoj Yadav And Anr....RESPONDENT None Present for the Applicant Ms.M.R.Tidke APP for Respondent/State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL J DATE : 22nd August, 2023 P.C. : Await Service. Stand Over to 12/10/2023 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Order - Status 23: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 592 OF 2021 Sunil Shantilal Majithia ....APPLICANT V/S Sobha Singh @ Sobha Manoj Yadav And Anr....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL J DATE : 12th October, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 09/11/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Order - Status 25: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 592 OF 2021 Sunil Shantilal Majithia ....APPLICANT V/S Sobha Singh @ Sobha Manoj Yadav And Anr....RESPONDENT Mr.Ashok Kumar Dubey i/b. SAVJ LAW SOLUTIONS for Applicant Mr.Yogesh Y.Dabke APP for Respondent/State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL J DATE : 9th November, 2023 P.C. : S. O. to 20/12/2023 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
1) Document Filed: Report
Filed By : Sunil Shantilal Majithia
Advocate: Savj Law Solutions
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 1: 30/08/2021
2) Document Filed: Vakalatnama
Filed By : Sobha Singh @ Sobha Manoj Yadav And Anr
Advocate: Manmohan A Amonkar
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 2: 31/08/2021
Respondent-1: Sobha Singh @ Sobha Manoj Yadav
Respondent-2: Anr
Petitioner-1: Sunil Shantilal Majithia
Respondent-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Petitioner-1: Anirudahha Nivruti Sonawane
Petitioner-2: Anr
Respondent-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Respondent-2: Anr
Petitioner-1: Amit Prakash Jaste
Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 545 OF 2019 Nenshi Ladhabhai Shah And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent CORAM : RANJIT MORE. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, JJ DATE : 30th July, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to as per CMIS date. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 545 OF 2019 Nenshi Ladhabhai Shah And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent Karan L Jain For Applicant Ms.S.D.Shinde- APP for the State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE. & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATE : 27th August, 2019 P.C. : Stand over to as per CMIS date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Respondent-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Respondent-2: Anr
Petitioner-1: Nenshi Ladhabhai Shah
Petitioner-2: Ors
Respondent-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Petitioner-1: Mohd Naseem Ansari